Digital currencies are not a financial product and operators do not need licenses to trade or hold them, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has said.
Additionally, an operator does not require a license to provide advice to others in relation to digital currencies, or to arrange for others to buy and sell them.
ASIC's comments are contained within a 32-page submission (download the pdf here) to the ongoing Australian Senate inquiry into digital currency.
Like the Australian Tax Office's ruling in August, ASIC's submission is regarded as temporary until such time as the federal government is able to clarify the issue with formal legislation.
The commission is Australia's principle corporate regulator, tasked with protecting the interests of investors and financial consumers.
Businesses connecting digital currencies to the fiat world, or other legally defined financial products, will still require market or financial services licences.
The submission itself says: "If there is a delay between the entry of the agreement to sell and the delivery of the digital currency, the contract may be a derivative and the financial services and financial markets regimes would apply in the normal way".
Additionally, under a section titled 'Facilities that May Be Financial Products', the paper refers to payment processors exchanging digital currencies for 'monetary value'. Facilitation of such 'non-cash' payments may still require a financial services license.
In particular, it referred to CoinJar's 'Swipe' debit card system, with which customers can fund a dollar account directly from their bitcoin balance, using CoinJar's exchange, and then use the card like a traditional debit card.
Living Room of Satoshi, which processes bill payments via Australia's national electronic BPAY network, reopened just this week after shutting down in October due to tax issues.
ASIC said it has received an application for a financial services license from a bitcoin trading platform for its bitcoin escrow service (though not the exchange itself).
After deliberating, the regulator said the bitcoin escrow service may be technically a financial product, but eventually decided that it was not, and would not be subject to the financial services regulatory regime.
The commission further explained that this was because the service is a minor part of a wider unregulated business, and that requiring a license may lead consumers to assume the entire business was ASIC regulated.
The ASIC submission is one of 44 to date from various stakeholders in Australian business and economy.
As well as individuals and bitcoin companies, this list has included industry groups like the Australian Payments Clearing Association (APCA) and regulatory/enforcement bodies like Australian Federal Police, the Australian Taxation Office and the department of the Attorney-General.
Additionally, an operator does not require a license to provide advice to others in relation to digital currencies, or to arrange for others to buy and sell them.
ASIC's comments are contained within a 32-page submission (download the pdf here) to the ongoing Australian Senate inquiry into digital currency.
Like the Australian Tax Office's ruling in August, ASIC's submission is regarded as temporary until such time as the federal government is able to clarify the issue with formal legislation.
The commission is Australia's principle corporate regulator, tasked with protecting the interests of investors and financial consumers.
License may still be required
While, on the surface, this news might be cause of excitement to some in the bitcoin space, in reality the exact nature of a digital currency's business will determine whether licences are required.Businesses connecting digital currencies to the fiat world, or other legally defined financial products, will still require market or financial services licences.
The submission itself says: "If there is a delay between the entry of the agreement to sell and the delivery of the digital currency, the contract may be a derivative and the financial services and financial markets regimes would apply in the normal way".
Additionally, under a section titled 'Facilities that May Be Financial Products', the paper refers to payment processors exchanging digital currencies for 'monetary value'. Facilitation of such 'non-cash' payments may still require a financial services license.
Examples cited
ASIC singles out two prominent Australian bitcoin companies – CoinJar and Living Room of Satoshi – as examples of such services.In particular, it referred to CoinJar's 'Swipe' debit card system, with which customers can fund a dollar account directly from their bitcoin balance, using CoinJar's exchange, and then use the card like a traditional debit card.
Living Room of Satoshi, which processes bill payments via Australia's national electronic BPAY network, reopened just this week after shutting down in October due to tax issues.
ASIC said it has received an application for a financial services license from a bitcoin trading platform for its bitcoin escrow service (though not the exchange itself).
After deliberating, the regulator said the bitcoin escrow service may be technically a financial product, but eventually decided that it was not, and would not be subject to the financial services regulatory regime.
The commission further explained that this was because the service is a minor part of a wider unregulated business, and that requiring a license may lead consumers to assume the entire business was ASIC regulated.
The ASIC submission is one of 44 to date from various stakeholders in Australian business and economy.
As well as individuals and bitcoin companies, this list has included industry groups like the Australian Payments Clearing Association (APCA) and regulatory/enforcement bodies like Australian Federal Police, the Australian Taxation Office and the department of the Attorney-General.
Recommended Content
Editors’ Picks
EUR/USD clings to gains above 1.0750 after US data
EUR/USD manages to hold in positive territory above 1.0750 despite retreating from the fresh multi-week high it set above 1.0800 earlier in the day. The US Dollar struggles to find demand following the weaker-than-expected NFP data.
GBP/USD declines below 1.2550 following NFP-inspired upsurge
GBP/USD struggles to preserve its bullish momentum and trades below 1.2550 in the American session. Earlier in the day, the disappointing April jobs report from the US triggered a USD selloff and allowed the pair to reach multi-week highs above 1.2600.
Gold struggles to hold above $2,300 despite falling US yields
Gold stays on the back foot below $2,300 in the American session on Friday. The benchmark 10-year US Treasury bond yield stays in negative territory below 4.6% after weak US data but the improving risk mood doesn't allow XAU/USD to gain traction.
Bitcoin Weekly Forecast: Should you buy BTC here? Premium
Bitcoin (BTC) price shows signs of a potential reversal but lacks confirmation, which has divided the investor community into two – those who are buying the dips and those who are expecting a further correction.
Week ahead – BoE and RBA decisions headline a calm week
Bank of England meets on Thursday, unlikely to signal rate cuts. Reserve Bank of Australia could maintain a higher-for-longer stance. Elsewhere, Bank of Japan releases summary of opinions.