|

PancakeSwap forks Uniswap V3: Are copycats like OHM Forks making a comeback?

  • PancakeSwap, a popular DEX, upgraded to its Version 3 on BNB and Ethereum chains through a fork of Uniswap V3.
  • Blockchain developers raise concerns of increased vulnerability to attacks, reminiscent of OHM forks. 
  • UNI is currently rallying, it remains to be seen whether the gains are sustainable in the long-term. 

Decentralized exchanges have long practiced “forking” of protocols for easy access and “copy-paste” code to power DEXes in the short-term. PancakeSwap’s Version 3 launch on the BNB and Ethereum chain was powered by a fork of Uniswap V3. 

The move garnered criticism from blockchain developers in the community and raised the issue of “security” of DEXs, since duplication exposes multiple platforms to the same threat. 

Also read: Ethereum Improvement Proposal EIP-4844 turns experts bullish, will ETH price rally?

PancakeSwap forked Uniswap V3 for Version 3 launch on BNB and Ethereum chain

PancakeSwap, one of the most popular DEXs in the DeFi ecosystem forked Uniswap’s V3 for its Version 3 launch. PancakeSwap V3 was rolled out on BNB and Ethereum chain, and gained $128.86 million in Total Value Locked (TVL) since its launch. 

PancakeSwap V3 TVL

PancakeSwap V3 TVL

PancakeSwap’s forking of the largest DeFi DEX Uniswap reminds experts of the DeFi summer of 2022 and OHM forks, which ended up in rug pulls for several market participants. 

There is a good and bad side of PancakeSwap forking UNI’s DEX. Uniswap has over 26,600 daily active users as of January 2023. The number of active users and the DEXs’ functionality could bring benefits to CAKE’s ecosystem. 

However, the dark side of “copy-paste” DEXs was the OHM forks of 2022. A copy-paste of the code without essential due diligence could result in security threats and loopholes that malicious actors could exploit. 

What were the OHM forks of the past

OHM forks are considered catalysts of DeFi 2.0 and the inspiration for metaverse projects. In 2021-22, forks of Olympus DAO’s codebase were used to obtain the liquidity of the protocol, instead of relying on DeFi’s practice of “yield farming.” 

Yield farming is the practice of locking up tokens for a fixed period of time and earning a yield through staking. Olympus DAO’s success made it the focal point of several forked projects that sprung up through the summer. 

Some of the most popular OHM forks of the time were Wonderland (TIME), Klima DAO (KLIMA), Rome DAO (ROME), Snowbank (SB), Hector DAO (HEC), Spartacus (SPA), Invictus (IN) and TaiChi DAO (TAC). 

Wonderland (TIME), a fork of OHM’s contract, was launched in the Avalanche ecosystem. The project’s contract was sniped at launch, raising questions on whether anything was “inherently wrong” with Wonderland. A group of insiders/ DeFi friends funded the launch and sniped the contract after being part of the core group of TIME. 

Several users were rug pulled (lost their funds) in a similar manner, when they picked projects based on lucrative Annual Percentage Yields (APY). 

OHM forks

OHM forks that suffered rug pull 

Prior to OHM forks, 2020 was filled with the launch of DeFi food-themed protocols like SushiSwap, BurgerSwap, Yam Finance, Bakery Swap, among others. Influencers and analysts warned crypto traders farming for yields on the BNB chain as Bakery Swap resulted in losses for several retail market participants. 

Binance CEO CZ commented on the trend in DeFi in a recent tweet, addressing Uniswap’s fork by PancakeSwap’s team.

Is PancakeSwap’s V3 launch the start of a new trend?

DeFi’s food-themed projects in 2020, OHM forks of 2021-22 and now Uniswap V3 forks is likely the new trend in Decentralized Finance. CAKE price witnessed a correction and started its recovery soon after. The launch of PancakeSwap V3 turned out to be a “non-event” for CAKE holders, unlike the V2 launch, which was a “sell-the-news.”

Uniswap’s UNI token continued rallying, yielding nearly 5% gains for holders since April 5, as the protocol got forked by PancakeSwap. It remains to be seen how sustainable UNI’s gains are in the long-term.

Author

Ekta Mourya

Ekta Mourya

FXStreet

Ekta Mourya has extensive experience in fundamental and on-chain analysis, particularly focused on impact of macroeconomics and central bank policies on cryptocurrencies.

More from Ekta Mourya
Share:

Editor's Picks

XRP consolidates as ETF inflows, rising derivatives interest offset selling pressure
Ripple (XRP) faces sustained selling pressure as bears maintain control on Monday. The remittance token has struggled to break above the $1.10 resistance since last Thursday, as risk sentiment weighs. Demand for XRP derivatives has gradually increased since last week, with the perpetual futures Open Interest (OI) averaging 2.4 billion XRP on Monday, up from 2.13 billion XRP the previous day.
Bitcoin Price Forecast: BTC remains below key 50-day EMA as headwinds from escalating US-Iran conflict offset ETF inflows
Bitcoin (BTC) trades just below its 50-day Exponential Moving Average (EMA) near $65,000 on Monday, a key technical level that could determine its next directional move. Institutional demand via ETFs improved somewhat last week, providing some tailwind for the Crypto King, but the latest round of strikes between the US and Iran has dampened risk appetite.
Crypto Today: Bitcoin, Ethereum, XRP slip as US-Iran escalating hostilities pressure risk assets
Cryptocurrency prices remain under pressure on Monday, as Bitcoin (BTC) falls toward $64,000. Altcoins, including Ethereum (ETH) and Ripple (XRP), uphold a weakening technical structure. ETH is trading sideways between support at $1,826 and resistance at $1,937. Meanwhile, XRP hovers below the pivotal $1.10 level, edging lower toward the primary $1.00 support.
Solana Price Forecast: SOL risks further decline amid weak institutional, retail demand
Solana (SOL) price edges lower on Monday, maintaining a corrective tone from early July. Institutional demand remains muted, with two consecutive weeks of inflows under $1 million, while declining Open Interest and the funding rate point to bearish retail interest, even as trading volume rises by over 70% in 24 hours.
Bitcoin’s potential recovery in the second half hinges on these 4 catalysts
Bitcoin (BTC) has fallen over 34% in the first half of this year as the King Crypto failed to capitalize on a good semester for risk assets despite the woes from the Iran war.