Many of today’s inflation hawks attribute the current high levels of inflation to excessively loose economic policies — both fiscal and monetary. They point to the policies implemented at the onset of the pandemic when public health considerations precipitative forced shutdowns across many sectors of the economy. At that time, Congress passed a massive covid relief bill that directly defrayed business losses and supported consumer spending; and the Fed sharply ramped up its purchases of financial assets, keeping interest rates near zero and assuring ample liquidity to allow the recovery to gain traction.

Would it really have been a better choice to have pursued policies that would have deferred these achievements until some more distant date? I tend to think not. I accept the current level of inflation as somewhat of the price that had to be paid to get America back to work. In any case, if you want to blame policy makers for being responsible for our current inflation, it’s only fair to credit those same people and institutions for precipitating the rapid pace of economic expansion that we’ve enjoyed for the last 6 quarters and counting, culminating with the recovery of virtually all the job losses from the pandemic and the lowest unemployment rate since immediately before the pandemic.

Econ 101 teaches that contractionary fiscal and monetary policy can be used to tamp down inflation. In both policy venues, the conventional anti-inflationary remedy requires suppressing aggregate demand. Fiscal policy does so by reducing spending by the government sector and/or raising taxes to decrease discretionary incomes, fostering a lower pace of spending by both households and businesses. Tight monetary policy requires reducing the rate of monetary expansion, which precipitates higher interest rates; and those higher interest rates make borrowing more expensive, causing a cutback in spending activity.

Those who blame current inflation rates on previously employed economic policies generally favor using both fiscal and monetary policy levers to address our current inflation difficulties. I’m on board with this orientation in connection with monetary policy, but I’m less enthusiastic about the shift of fiscal policy. I fear that the broad-brush fiscal policy designed to dampen aggregate demand may be unnecessary and even shortsighted.

Monetary policy is a blunt tool that inherently chooses between directing its efforts to either (a) encourage faster economic growth and lower unemployment or (b) fight inflation. Fiscal policy, on the other hand, isn’t so binary. While fiscal policy can certainly be used to counter inflation, it must be used in connection with other policy goals, as well, like insuring health, safety, and general welfare. Sometimes — like now — these various objectives may be somewhat in conflict; in which case objectives unrelated to inflation shouldn’t be entirely ignored.

It’s also important to realize that while government spending is certainly a component of aggregate demand, over time, that same spending can also influence aggregate supply. Specifically, any spending that improves market efficiencies or encourages greater labor force participation stimulates aggregate supply along with aggregate demand. Categorically seeing such expenditures as inflationary is an overly simplistic assessment.

Whether spending is inflationary or not may depend on the nature of the expenditures and the time horizon under consideration. Over time, the supply side effect could very well dominate relative to demand side effects in many types of government spending. The traditional economic policy remedy on the fiscal side fails to give appropriate weight to this consideration.

Consider, for example, the various kinds of spending initiatives that had been suggested under the Build Back Better program, including funding to (a) maintain and improve traditional infrastructure, (b) expand broadband access, (c) lower health care costs, (d) encourage the transition to clean energy, and (e) offer support to families with pre-school age children. Categorizing all of these initiatives as inflationary is disingenuous. That’s hardly the case. Much of that spending would have directly lowered costs for American households or stimulated higher labor force participation in a host of newly created jobs. In any case, as originally conceived, all the expenditures under the Build Back Better bill were to be funded by higher taxes. By itself, that tax provision should have obviated the criticism that the bill was inflationary.

The fact that the Build Back Better plan has failed shouldn’t preclude further efforts to pass a more scaled back version of it. Current circumstances relating to each of the bill’s component areas mentioned above are certainly not optimal; and failure to embark on any constructive action in any of these areas is indefensible. We can walk and chew gum at the same time. Monetary policy can bear the onus of bringing down inflation. Fiscal policy can be directed toward solving other problems.

Derivatives Litigation Services assists legal teams with litigation when derivative contracts play a role in disputed transactions. The firm offers advice and counsel on a best efforts basis but bears no responsibility for outcomes dictated by mediation or court judgments.

Recommended Content


Recommended Content

Editors’ Picks

USD/JPY pops and drops on BoJ's expected hold

USD/JPY pops and drops on BoJ's expected hold

USD/JPY reverses a knee-jerk spike to 142.80 and returns to the red below 142.50 after the Bank of Japan announced on Friday that it maintained the short-term rate target in the range of 0.15%-0.25%, as widely expected. Governor Ueda's press conference is next in focus.  

USD/JPY News
AUD/USD bears attack 0.6800 amid PBOC's status-quo, cautious mood

AUD/USD bears attack 0.6800 amid PBOC's status-quo, cautious mood

AUD/USD attacks 0.6800 in Friday's Asian trading, extending its gradual retreat after the PBOC unexpectedly left mortgage lending rates unchanged in September. A cautious market mood also adds to the weight on the Aussie. Fedspeak eyed. 

AUD/USD News
Gold consolidates near record high, bullish potential seems intact

Gold consolidates near record high, bullish potential seems intact

Gold price regained positive traction on Thursday and rallied back closer to the all-time peak touched the previous day in reaction to the Federal Reserve's decision to start the policy easing cycle with an oversized rate cut.

Gold News
Ethereum rallies over 6% following decision to split Pectra upgrade into two phases

Ethereum rallies over 6% following decision to split Pectra upgrade into two phases

In its Consensus Layer Call on Thursday, Ethereum developers decided to split the upcoming Pectra upgrade into two batches. The decision follows concerns about potential risks in shipping the previously approved series of Ethereum improvement proposals.

Read more
Bank of Japan set to keep rates on hold after July’s hike shocked markets

Bank of Japan set to keep rates on hold after July’s hike shocked markets

The Bank of Japan is expected to keep its short-term interest rate target between 0.15% and 0.25% on Friday, following the conclusion of its two-day monetary policy review. The decision is set to be announced during the early Asian session. 

Read more
Moneta Markets review 2024: All you need to know

Moneta Markets review 2024: All you need to know

VERIFIED In this review, the FXStreet team provides an independent and thorough analysis based on direct testing and real experiences with Moneta Markets – an excellent broker for novice to intermediate forex traders who want to broaden their knowledge base.

Read More

Majors

Cryptocurrencies

Signatures