A BIS study on the Effective Lower Bound of Interest rates suggests central banks can do other things than slash rates.
Have central banks gone too far in with rate cuts? I think so, and a BIS study No 804 (Un)conventional Policy and the Effective Lower Bound concludes the same thing.
The 47-page study is for geeks and it is mostly unintelligible gibberish that I will mock. A few small sections of the report are mostly understandable. Here are a couple such snips.
In response to the Financial and economic crisis of 2008-09, central banks have aggressively cut monetary policy rates, in many cases all the way to the effective lower bound (henceforth ELB), namely the rate below which it becomes profitable for Financial institutions to exchange central bank reserves for cash.
Our main result is that in reaction to a Financial shock which reduces banks' monitoring efficiency, credit policy may be a more efficient tool than policy interest rates.
Cutting policy rates to zero may be unnecessary after non-standard measures have been implemented.
The report was mostly 47 pages of nonsense that looked like the following:
BIS Study 804 Snip 1
BIS Study 804 Snip 2
BIS Study 804 Snip 3
The study had 20 references to the word "assume".
Note the preceding snip to "simply" the solution via a simple "approximation".
The study is rife with gibberish about things like "output gaps" that cannot be accurately calculated even if they exist at all.
In the first snip above, the study mentions "entrepreneurs would postpone consumption until the time of death."
This is another way of saying time preference cannot logically be negative.
Conclusion
Despite all the gibberish and mathematical nonsense, the final conclusion is at least somewhat understandable "Cutting policy rates to zero may be unnecessary after non-standard measures have been implemented".
I would revise and expand the sentence as follows.
Cutting rates to zero can never be correct. It is against laws of finance and time preference, which can never be negative. But there should not be a Fed in the first place either to cut rates or to implement "non-standard" measures.
Brick Wall
Central banks are the problem, not the solution.
They have hit a brick wall and cannot cram any more debt into the system.
There is no tolerance for paying interest.
The evidence is overwhelming.
- More Currency Wars: Swiss Central Bank Poised to Cut Interest Rate to -1.0%
- Inverted Negative Yields in Germany and Negative Rate Mortgages.
- Fed Trapped in a Rate-Cutting Box: It's the Debt Stupid
This material is based upon information that Sitka Pacific Capital Management considers reliable and endeavors to keep current, Sitka Pacific Capital Management does not assure that this material is accurate, current or complete, and it should not be relied upon as such.
Recommended Content
Editors’ Picks
EUR/USD drops to near 1.0850, further support at nine-day EMA
EUR/USD continues to lose ground, trading around 1.0860 during the Asian hours on Friday. From a technical perspective on a daily chart analysis indicates a sideways trend for the pair as it continues to lie within the symmetrical triangle.
GBP/USD posts modest gains above 1.2650, focus on the Fedspeak
The GBP/USD pair posts modest gains near 1.2670 during the Asian session on Friday. Meanwhile, the USD Index recovers some lost ground after retracing to multi-week lows near 104.00 in the previous session.
Gold price gains ground, with Fed speakers in focus
The Gold price trades with a positive bias on Friday. The bullish move of precious metals in the previous sessions was bolstered by the softer-than-expected US inflation data in April, which triggered hope for rate cuts from the US Fed.
LINK price jumps 10% as Chainlink races toward tokenization of funds
Chainlink price has remained range-bound for a while, stuck between the $16.00 roadblock to the upside and $13.08 to the downside. However, in light of recent revelations, the token may have further upside potential.
Fed speak tempers rate cut expectations
The biggest takeaway into Friday is the latest round of Fed speak. These Fed officials reiterated their stance rates should be kept restrictive for a longer period of time until there is more clear evidence inflation is heading back towards the 2% target.