|

US election risk and the markets blind spots

In the Middle East, Hamas has accepted a ceasefire proposal from Qatar and Egypt, but the Israeli government has not acknowledged it. While this development carries significant humanitarian implications, its direct impact on the market seems limited, with only a slight increase in oil prices observed. This is largely due to the perceived weaker US demand remaining the current driver of oil price movements.

However, looking ahead, there may be broader political implications, especially given the divisive nature of the issue in the United States. With Republican and Democratic party conventions approaching in July and August, this matter could become a focal point of discussion, potentially influencing political dynamics both domestically and internationally.

US equities face two significant "unpriced" risks: domestic politics and legal proceedings against tech monopolies.

Regarding domestic politics, volatility markets appear to be underestimating the risk of an inconclusive election result or potential societal upheaval in the event of a Trump loss. This presents a notable blind spot in market pricing.

Similarly, legal actions against America's tech giants pose a risk that has yet to be fully incorporated into market valuations. Despite ongoing legal proceedings, there is little evidence to suggest that the threat of antitrust action is impacting multiples in the tech sector. Even though lawsuits have been filed and one has gone to trial, analysts seem relatively unconcerned about the potential consequences of increased regulatory scrutiny on Big Tech.

One possible outcome of heightened regulatory attention is a reduction in prospective growth for tech companies. Measures such as curbing market share, limiting pricing power, and blocking mergers could be imposed by regulators. However, there is minimal indication that company analysts are factoring these risks into their forecasts. Despite the potential implications, analysts have not significantly adjusted their sales and earnings estimates in anticipation of regulatory intervention.

Author

Stephen Innes

Stephen Innes

SPI Asset Management

With more than 25 years of experience, Stephen has a deep-seated knowledge of G10 and Asian currency markets as well as precious metal and oil markets.

More from Stephen Innes
Share:

Editor's Picks

GBP/USD clings to multi-day peaks below 1.3500

GBP/USD trades with marked gains on Friday, now giving away some gains following an earlier surpass of the key 1.3500 yardstick. Indeed, Cable gathers fresh steam amid the strong offered stance in the Greenback, all after US NFP badly missed expectations in July.

EUR/USD: Post-NFP bounce falters around 1.1580

EUR/USD reverses Thursday’s decline and trades with solid gains in the 1.1560 region, or two-month peaks, on Friday. The pair’s firm performance comes in a context of a sharp correction in the US Dollar as investors continue to assess disheartening US NFP readings.

How Wall Street rigs the game [Video]

In this week’s Live from the Vault, Andrew Maguire is joined by Peter Antico and Sean Stone to discuss the Paradigm of Money - an in-depth expose of financial market corruption, from naked shorting to the two-tier system that protects Wall Street.

XRP Price Forecast: XRP nears critical $1.00 support
Ripple (XRP) remains pressured on Friday, trading around $1.03 at the time of writing. The token appears to hold this current level as support but lacks a catalyst to sustain a knee-jerk rebound toward the next key resistance at $1.10.
Is Gold about to enter its biggest bull run since 2020?
Gold has stormed back into the spotlight and its next move could leave late buyers chasing. On August 5, the yellow metal surged almost 7% – roughly $174 – to close near $4,308 an ounce, posting one of its biggest daily advances in recent history. A weaker U.S dollar, falling Treasury yields, changing Federal Reserve expectations and renewed safe-haven demand all struck at once.
9-3: Is the Federal Reserve’s vote tally Warsh's new forward guidance?
The rate did not move. Neither did the statement, and that’s the more interesting fact. Set the July 29 Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) statement beside the one issued on June 17, and the two documents are identical apart from a single verb and a paragraph at the bottom naming three dissenters.