|

World trade takes another beating and heads for worst year since 2009 - ING

Raoul Leering, Head of International Trade Analysis at ING, notes that the global trade in volume terms took another beating in October and is heading for its worst year since the trade collapse in 2009.

Key Quotes

“Due to structural changes and little support from the economic cycle, a turnaround in the short run is unlikely.”

“According to CPB Netherlands Bureau for Policy Analysis world trade in volumes was 1.1% down in October compared to September. The September figure was revised down to -0.5% (initially -0.4%).”

“Global trade is sliding into ever more gloomy territory. Nowadays it not only fails to outpace world GDP growth, it hardly grows at all. During the first ten months of 2016 the monthly average trade flow is only 0.8% higher than last year.”

“The stagnation of trade is largely due to emerging markets (-1% thus far compared to last year). The most negative contribution comes from the Middle East, Latin America and Africa. But the stagnation of imports in emerging Asia plays a large role as well. In 2013, this region accounted for 75% of the increase in global trade, but this year and last year emerging Asia has shown hardly any import demand growth.”

“China is largely responsible for the import slump in emerging Asia. The rebalancing of its economy towards consumption instead of export results in less imports of intermediates, reinforced by the government policy to stimulate the use of domestic suppliers.”

“Not only structural developments in China suppress trade growth. Protectionism and the slowdown of the expansion of global value chains are other factors. Since these developments will not fade overnight, there is little hope for a trade revival in 2017. Since we expect world GDP growth to accelerate only modestly next year (from 2.4% to to 2.9%), the economic cycle will not cause a turnaround in trade growth either.”

Author

Sandeep Kanihama

Sandeep Kanihama

FXStreet Contributor

Sandeep Kanihama is an FX Editor and Analyst with FXstreet having principally focus area on Asia and European markets with commodity, currency and equities coverage. He is stationed in the Indian capital city of Delhi.

More from Sandeep Kanihama
Share:

Editor's Picks

GBP/USD clings to multi-day peaks below 1.3500

GBP/USD trades with marked gains on Friday, now giving away some gains following an earlier surpass of the key 1.3500 yardstick. Indeed, Cable gathers fresh steam amid the strong offered stance in the Greenback, all after US NFP badly missed expectations in July.

EUR/USD: Post-NFP bounce falters around 1.1580

EUR/USD reverses Thursday’s decline and trades with solid gains in the 1.1560 region, or two-month peaks, on Friday. The pair’s firm performance comes in a context of a sharp correction in the US Dollar as investors continue to assess disheartening US NFP readings.

How Wall Street rigs the game [Video]

In this week’s Live from the Vault, Andrew Maguire is joined by Peter Antico and Sean Stone to discuss the Paradigm of Money - an in-depth expose of financial market corruption, from naked shorting to the two-tier system that protects Wall Street.

XRP Price Forecast: XRP nears critical $1.00 support
Ripple (XRP) remains pressured on Friday, trading around $1.03 at the time of writing. The token appears to hold this current level as support but lacks a catalyst to sustain a knee-jerk rebound toward the next key resistance at $1.10.
Is Gold about to enter its biggest bull run since 2020?
Gold has stormed back into the spotlight and its next move could leave late buyers chasing. On August 5, the yellow metal surged almost 7% – roughly $174 – to close near $4,308 an ounce, posting one of its biggest daily advances in recent history. A weaker U.S dollar, falling Treasury yields, changing Federal Reserve expectations and renewed safe-haven demand all struck at once.
9-3: Is the Federal Reserve’s vote tally Warsh's new forward guidance?
The rate did not move. Neither did the statement, and that’s the more interesting fact. Set the July 29 Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) statement beside the one issued on June 17, and the two documents are identical apart from a single verb and a paragraph at the bottom naming three dissenters.