Increasingly, my view of all of the action in ES (e-mini March S&P futures contract) from the 12/25/18 electronic Christmas Day low at 2316.75 into last Friday’s (1/18/19) high at 2677.75 (+15.6%) represents three distinct psychological phases of market influence, which I have color-coded on the attached chart: 1) Red: Natural Acute Oversold Market Recovery Rally, 2) Turquoise: Fed Rate Pause-(Algorithmic Headline) Rally, and 3) Gray: China Stimulus, Positive Trade News (Algorithmic Headline) Rally.
The initial sharp recovery rally after Christmas Day coincided with a Fear and Greed Gauge reading of 0, and a Daily Sentiment Index (DSI) of 6. The sharpness of the vertical upmove from the 12/25/18 low into the 12/28/18 high—from 2316.75 to 2523.00—or 8.9% in my experience represents a classic short covering, counter-trend rally that returns the price structure to area of its most recent breakdown plateau, 2520-2550. The initial recovery phase off of an acute oversold condition was NOT precipitated by or associated with outside market influences. Indeed, at the end of December, the economic and geopolitical news was getting progressively more negative, while the Fed was silent, having hiked rates on December 19th, intent on raising rates 3 to 4 more times during 2019!
The second phase of recovery off of the Christmas Day low at 2316.75 commenced on January 4th, just a few hours after Apple Inc., preannounced a big revenue shortfall for Q4. Imagine that, on the first trading session of 2019 (1/03), Apple decided to drop a weak earnings bombshell on investors who already endured a 20%, three month stock market beating!
Coincidentally or not, the very next day, Fed Chair Jay Powell felt compelled to spring into action during a scheduled televised discussion with former Fed Heads Bernanke and Yellen, which he used to inform investors that (paraphrasing): The FOMC will exhibit more patience and data dependence before hiking rates again during 2019, and listen more intently to the “message” of the equity markets (even though the economy is neither synonymous with the market, nor is the market synonymous with the economy). The markets took Powell’s comments to mean that Fed is pausing in its rate hike cycle.
The headlines triggered algo buying that ripped ES from 2470 on Friday morning January 4th to 2580 the following Tuesday, January 8th. However, at that point investors and traders were beginning to fret about Powell’s apparent intransigence about walking back his prior comments that Quantitative Tightening (QT) remains on “autopilot,”
On the afternoon of Thursday, January 10th, less than one week from his original televised discussion telling investors about the Fed’s more patient, deliberate approach, Fed Chair Powell held a second televised Q&A session to re-emphasize what he said during his January 4th televised Q&A session, but also (paraphrasing): re-emphasized that the monthly drawdown of the Fed’s balance sheet (aka Quantitative Tightening) was not set in stone. In other words, QT was not on autopilot after all, even though The Powell Fed has not suspended or modified the monthly roll-off of mortgages and Treasury bonds from the balance sheet.
Once again, ES ripped to the upside as the algo buy programs kicked in at 2560, propelling ES to 2599.50 in a matter of a couple of hours The Powell “Double-Down” on a rate hike pause was complete (see Turquoise shaded area on the chart). The impact of the January 10th Powell televised Q&A was to double down on the Chairman’s January 4th back-pedaling on expectations of higher rates during 2019 that could have ratcheted Fed funds to 3.00%-3.25%, and as such, closer to its “Natural Rate” of “Normalization.” After January 4th, The Powell Fed was telling investors and the markets that the 9 rate hikes of 25 bps from 0% to 2.25% from December 2015 into December 2018 was all the STOCK MARKET and the mighty U.S. economy could handle for now. It is time to pause and to assess the data.
Heading into last week’s trading session, starting on Monday, January 14th, ES stood at 2595.00, 6% above “The Apple Earnings Low” on January 3rd, which was the day prior to Fed Chair Powell’s initial capitulation on pausing his rate normalization cycle, and 12% above the Christmas Day low at 2316.75.
It was on January 14th, that I penned an article entitled, “Is the Recovery Rally Nearing Exhaustion? In the absence of a new, bullish catalyst, such as a resolution of the U.S.-China trade dispute, the 12% upmove off of the December low amounting to a healthy 44% recovery of the entire decline, suggested that combination of the declining 50 DMA and the 50% retracement-resistance zone at 2635, coupled with a healthy rebound in investor sentiment would put a lid on upside continuation. The second phase of the recovery rally period—the Fed Intervention Phase amounted to a climb in ES of 6.2%, somewhat less than the 8.9% advance seen in Phase 1, The Acute Oversold Recovery Rally Phase.
My logic might have been spot on in a bygone era when central banks were neither rock stars nor saviors, but since 2009, perceptions certainly have “evolved.” On Monday morning, January 15th, China (PBOC) announced a massive liquidity injection, and supposedly even intimated that it may intervene in the China equity markets to “restore investor confidence.”
That news was all it took to trigger the third phase of the recovery rally period, which involved another algo headline knee-jerk thrust from 2580 to 2605 in about 15 minutes right after the opening bell, which then morphed into unsubstantiated stories and rumors that the Trump Administration was considering lifting sanctions on China in a good faith measure to extract concessions on intellectual property rights. And if that wasn’t enough positive news to send the algos into orbit, another story emerged indicating that China intends to spend $1 trillion on US goods to redress the trade imbalance by 2024!
Phase 3 of the recovery rally is demarcated by the Gray shaded area on the attached chart. Mysteriously and prophetically for the bulls, all of last week’s news shifted from Fed back pedaling on rates to promising evidence that meaningful progress was being made by both sides towards ending the U.S.-China trade spat. The prospective bullish news propelled ES from the opening bell on Monday January 15th at 2580.25 to the close on Friday January 18th at 2677.75, a climb of 3.8%.
We can make the case, that the 57% recovery of the entire September-December decline is at or nearing exhaustion of three phases of bullish psychology: 1) an acute oversold condition, 2) Fed Intervention, and 3) China Stimulus and Anticipatory News about an End to the U.S. Trade Dispute. Each of the three phases has coincided with upmoves of lessening magnitude and amplitude, which if nothing else, is a warning to us that justification for buying strength at current levels is waning rapidly, especially in the absence of more bullish news catalysts.
I suspect additional algo-triggering bullish news could come in the form of an actual U.S.-China trade deal, or even an end to the Government Shutdown. Then again, the Trumpian Way seems to have a penchant to play games of brinkmanship with adversaries, foreign or domestic. In the case of China, given recent weaker-than-expected economic data, the March 1st deadline is likely to encourage delay into 11th hour event risk, while the month-long Government Shutdown, though damaging to a small segment of the population (and disheartening to millions), so far has failed to extract a potentially severe political or economic cost, and for that reason, might extend for considerably longer than anyone expects.
With the foregoing in mind, all eyes on 2635/40, which if violated and sustained, will argue that near term bullish Fed and China supportive psychology has been expended, and will leave the algos inversely poised for negative news triggers.
In using any portion of MPTrader, you agree to the Terms and Conditions governing the use of the service as described in this disclaimer. Our disclaimers, policies and terms are subject to change without notice. MPTrader (www.mptrader.com) is published by AdviceTrade, Inc. and MJP Market Strategies, Inc., both of whom are publishers. The Web site is maintained by Codexia, LLC and has a marketing affiliation with The Technical Trader. None of these firms or individuals is registered as a broker-dealer or investment adviser either with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or with any state securities authority. Mr. Paulenoff's commentaries and index analysis represent his own opinions and should not be relied upon for purposes of effecting securities transactions or other investing strategies, nor should they be construed as an offer or solicitation of an offer to sell or buy any security. You should not interpret Mr. Paulenoff's opinions as constituting investment advice. Trades mentioned on the site are hypothetical, not actual, positions and Mr. Paulenoff and employees of AdviceTrade do not have personal positions in instruments mentioned on the site. Hypothetical performance results do not include trading commissions and other execution costs that would be incurred if the trades referenced in the diary or elsewhere on the site were actual trades. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. MJP Market Strategies, AdviceTrade, and Codexia cannot and do not assess, verify or guarantee the suitability or profitability of any particular investment. The risk of loss in trading index futures can be substantial. You should therefore carefully consider whether such trading is suitablef or you in light of your financial condition. You bear responsibility for your own investment research and decisions and should seek the advice of a qualified securities professional before making any investment. As an express condition of using this service and anytime after ending the service, you agree not to hold any employees of MJP Market Strategies, AdviceTrade, or Codexia or the companies themselves liable for trading losses, lost profits or other damages resulting from your use of information in MPTrader in any form (Web-based, email-based, or downloadable software), and you agree to indemnify and hold MJP Market Strategies, AdviceTrade, and Codexia and their employees harmless from and against any and all claims, losses, liabilities, costs, and expenses (including but not limited to attorneys' fees) arising from your violation of this agreement. This paragraph is not intended to limit rights available to you or to us that may be available under the federal securities laws.