Executive Summary

The measures taken to combat the spread of COVID over the past year have had wide implications for the U.S. economy. One of the most notable effects has been the swift shift for millions of employees to working from home (WFH). With a large share of the workforce having successfully navigated their professional work from company offices to kitchen tables, the big question is how much WFH will last in the post-pandemic world? Furthermore, what are some of the potential implications of a more permanent shift in the work environment?

In this report, we examine WFH and its ability to have a meaningful effect on U.S. productivity growth and thereby potential U.S. output growth more generally. Using our earlier work projecting a rebound in the labor force participation rate post-COVID, we estimate that WFH would only need to raise total factor productivity growth by 0.3 points per year beyond what the Congressional Budget Office currently projects to raise potential growth back to its 2002-2007 pace. That might not seem like much of a lift. However, the ability of individuals to work from home without losing productivity varies widely by industry. Accounting for the range in industry capability and composition of the U.S. workforce, we estimate that the fraction of employees working from home would need to raise total factor productivity growth by a steeper 0.9% per annum, which is probably is not achievable. Consequently, it will likely take more than just WFH to raise potential GDP growth in the coming years back to the rate of nearly 3% per annum that prevailed immediately prior to the financial crisis.

Possible Effects of Work from Home

Millions of individuals have begun working from home since the onset of the pandemic nearly a year ago. The Bureau of Labor Statistics estimates that 24% of employed persons teleworked specifically because of the pandemic in December.1 Only 8% of employees worked exclusively from home at least one day per week prior to the pandemic, and just 2% of employees worked from home five days a week.2 As analysts contemplate the post-pandemic world in the context of this surge in WFH, one of the questions they have been asking is how permanent WFH will become? Some individuals seem to prefer their new WFH environment, with studies finding that many office workers want some option for remote work post-COVID.3 Furthermore, many employers may be able to economize on office space if WFH remains a significant feature of the post-COVID work environment. So, there are reasons to believe that WFH could be with us on a more permanent basis. If so, could it have a meaningful effect on productivity and, thereby, on potential economic growth?

This report leverages analysis that we have undertaken in the past year. We wrote about the effects that WFH could potentially have on labor productivity in a report published last July. One of the studies that we referenced in that report suggested that WFH could boost productivity, subject to some important caveats.4 More recently, we published a report projecting the labor force participation rate (LFPR) over the next few years, which factored in the potential for WFH to boost participation. In this report, we use these projections and recent analysis by the McKinsey Global Institute as well as the Congressional Budget Office's (CBO) 10-year economic forecasts to analyze the ability of WFH to have a meaningful effect on productivity growth, and thereby the potential growth rate of the U.S. economy.

Potential Output Growth Has Downshifted

As shown in Figure 1, the CBO estimates that the potential economic growth rate of the U.S. nonfarm business sector has fluctuated over the past few decades and has generally followed a downward trend over that period.5 The rate of potential GDP growth in the nonfarm business sector averaged 2.8% per annum during the expansion that spanned 2002 through 2007, but it downshifted to only 1.9% during the long economic upswing that ended with the onset of the pandemic last year.

fxsoriginal

There are three main components of potential GDP growth: growth in labor, growth in capital and growth in total factor productivity (TFP). In simple terms, TFP measures the output gains that arise from factors such as technological change, superior methods to use capital and labor, harder work effort, greater human capital, etc. Labor input has decelerated markedly in the past two decades as the entrance of baby boomers and women in greater numbers, which boosted growth in labor supply in earlier years, ran its course (Figure 2). This deceleration in the labor force growth is one of the factors that has weighed on potential output growth in recent years. But growth in capital and TFP have also slipped into lower gears, weighing on potential GDP growth as well.

fxsoriginal

Can Work from Home Lift Potential Output?

What is the outlook for potential GDP growth in the U.S. economy in coming years? Table 1 presents two different scenarios. Scenario I is based on the 10-year forecasts of the CBO. Although the CBO looks for TFP growth to pick up a bit from the 0.7% per annum rate that it averaged during the most recent expansion, continued deceleration in the labor force will exert some headwinds on potential GDP growth in the nonfarm business sector in coming years. Specifically, the CBO forecasts that potential GDP growth will average roughly 2.0% per annum over the rest of the decade.

GDP

Scenario II is based on the projections of the LFPR that we highlighted in our recent report. The CBO forecasts that the LFPR in the nonfarm business sector will decline 2020 to 60.7% in 2030 from 61.8% in 2020, thereby weighing on the growth rate of labor supply. Using some reasonable assumptions in the LFPR report we referenced earlier, we forecast that the LFPR could trend up to more than 63% by the end of the decade. This stronger rate of labor force participation translates into a stronger rate of potential GDP growth. Indeed, potential GDP growth could strengthen to 2.5% per annum in coming years if the LFPR rises as we project in Scenario II.

As noted previously, the rate of potential GDP growth in the nonfarm business sector averaged 2.8% per annum during the expansion that spanned 2002 through 2007. To return to that rate of potential GDP growth, TFP would need to grow only 0.3 percentage points more per annum (assuming that growth in the labor and capital inputs remain unchanged relative to the rates shown in Scenario II). If WFH makes working individuals more productive, a 0.3 percentage point increase in TFP growth per annum does not seem to be unreasonable. WFH could conceivably return the economy's potential growth to the solid rates it registered immediately prior to the financial crisis.

However, not all individuals are able to work from home, let alone work as effectively in a WFH environment as they would in person. The capability to work from home varies significantly by industry, as some jobs require sharing specialized machinery, moving physical items from one place to another or interacting in-person.

To estimate the share of the U.S. workforce that could plausibly work from home without a loss of productivity, we use an analysis from the McKinsey Global Institute.6 The study finds that the share of work that can be done remotely without losing any efficacy ranges widely across 16 major industries that we consider in our analysis. At the low end, McKinsey estimates that only 8% of work in the accommodation & food services industry can be done remotely, while at the upper end 76% of work finance & insurance industry could be performed at home without denting productivity.

Accounting for each industry's scope to work from home and the size of those industries, we estimate that only about 30% of the U.S. workforce could work from home without a loss of productivity. This estimate implies that WFH would need to the raise the TFP of individuals who can work from home by roughly 0.9% per annum to drive economy-wide TFP up to a 1.4% pace and facilitate potential GDP growth climbing back to 2.8%. According to CBO estimates, TFP rose at an average rate of 1.4% per annum between 1950 and 2019. With this long-run average in mind, we do not think it is plausible to expect that individuals who have the ability to work from home would be able to realize a 0.9 percentage point per annum increase in their TFP from WFH alone.

WFH Only One Possible Way to Lift Productivity Growth

We took only a narrow view of the pandemic's effect on potential GDP growth in this report. That is, we focused narrowly on how WFH could increase TFP growth and, thereby, long-run GDP growth. But, the long-run response from businesses to the pandemic could potentially be more extensive than simply WFH. For example, businesses could invest more heavily in digital capabilities. Not only could TFP growth be bolstered by more extensive use of digital capabilities, but higher investment in equipment would lead to capital deepening, which would also strengthen potential GDP growth, everything else equal.

Another way the pandemic may ultimately strengthen TFP growth is by sparking more dynamism in the economy. Although many businesses have closed permanently, new business formation has surged (Figure 4). The flurry of entrepreneurship increases the chances of TFP rising from novel products and processes in coming years. And beyond productivity growth, another way to boost potential GDP growth would be to increase the labor supply not only through higher participation rates as we discussed in our prior report, but stronger population growth. Faster growth in the working-age population over the current decade could be achieved through higher immigration, which has slowed in recent years (Figure 5).

US

We are still in the early stages of determining how the pandemic may change the course of economic growth over the medium to long term. In the near term, potential GDP growth has suffered from a sharp drop in the labor force from lower labor force participation and from weaker capital spending. Looking forward, however, we suspect that a rebound in the LFPR will help to lift the potential growth rate of the U.S. economy somewhat. Furthermore, WFH could lead to some acceleration in TFP growth. That said, returning to a potential GDP growth rate in the nonfarm business sector of 2.8% per annum likely will require more than just a modest increase in the LFPR and the marginal TFP-enhancing effect of WFH.

Download The Full Special Commentary

Recently, the stock market has experienced high levels of volatility. If you are thinking about participating in fast moving markets, please take the time to read the information below. Wells Fargo Investments, LLC will not be restricting trading on fast moving securities, but you should understand that there can be significant additional risks to trading in a fast market. We've tried to outline the issues so you can better understand the potential risks. If you're unsure about the risks of a fast market and how they may affect a particular trade you've considering, you may want to place your trade through a phone agent at 1-800-TRADERS. The agent can explain the difference between market and limit orders and answer any questions you may have about trading in volatile markets. Higher Margin Maintenance Requirements on Volatile Issues The wide swings in intra-day trading have also necessitated higher margin maintenance requirements for certain stocks, specifically Internet, e-commerce and high-tech issues. Due to their high volatility, some of these stocks will have an initial and a maintenance requirement of up to 70%. Stocks are added to this list daily based on market conditions. Please call 1-800-TRADERS to check whether a particular stock has a higher margin maintenance requirement. Please note: this higher margin requirement applies to both new purchases and current holdings. A change in the margin requirement for a current holding may result in a margin maintenance call on your account. Fast Markets A fast market is characterized by heavy trading and highly volatile prices. These markets are often the result of an imbalance of trade orders, for example: all "buys" and no "sells." Many kinds of events can trigger a fast market, for example a highly anticipated Initial Public Offering (IPO), an important company news announcement or an analyst recommendation. Remember, fast market conditions can affect your trades regardless of whether they are placed with an agent, over the internet or on a touch tone telephone system. In Fast Markets service response and account access times may vary due to market conditions, systems performance, and other factors. Potential Risks in a Fast Market "Real-time" Price Quotes May Not be Accurate Prices and trades move so quickly in a fast market that there can be significant price differences between the quotes you receive one moment and the next. Even "real-time quotes" can be far behind what is currently happening in the market. The size of a quote, meaning the number of shares available at a particular price, may change just as quickly. A real-time quote for a fast moving stock may be more indicative of what has already occurred in the market rather than the price you will receive. Your Execution Price and Orders Ahead In a fast market, orders are submitted to market makers and specialists at such a rapid pace, that a backlog builds up which can create significant delays. Market makers may execute orders manually or reduce size guarantees during periods of volatility. When you place a market order, your order is executed on a first-come first-serve basis. This means if there are orders ahead of yours, those orders will be executed first. The execution of orders ahead of yours can significantly affect your execution price. Your submitted market order cannot be changed or cancelled once the stock begins trading. Initial Public Offerings may be Volatile IPOs for some internet, e-commerce and high tech issues may be particularly volatile as they begin to trade in the secondary market. Customers should be aware that market orders for these new public companies are executed at the current market price, not the initial offering price. Market orders are executed fully and promptly, without regard to price and in a fast market this may result in an execution significantly different from the current price quoted for that security. Using a limit order can limit your risk of receiving an unexpected execution price. Large Orders in Fast Markets Large orders are often filled in smaller blocks. An order for 10,000 shares will sometimes be executed in two blocks of 5,000 shares each. In a fast market, when you place an order for 10,000 shares and the real-time market quote indicates there are 15,000 shares at 5, you would expect your order to execute at 5. In a fast market, with a backlog of orders, a real-time quote may not reflect the state of the market at the time your order is received by the market maker or specialist. Once the order is received, it is executed at the best prices available, depending on how many shares are offered at each price. Volatile markets may cause the market maker to reduce the size of guarantees. This could result in your large order being filled in unexpected smaller blocks and at significantly different prices. For example: an order for 10,000 shares could be filled as 2,500 shares at 5 and 7,500 shares at 10, even though you received a real-time quote indicating that 15,000 shares were available at 5. In this example, the market moved significantly from the time the "real-time" market quote was received and when the order was submitted. Online Trading and Duplicate Orders Because fast markets can cause significant delays in the execution of a trade, you may be tempted to cancel and resubmit your order. Please consider these delays before canceling or changing your market order, and then resubmitting it. There is a chance that your order may have already been executed, but due to delays at the exchange, not yet reported. When you cancel or change and then resubmit a market order in a fast market, you run the risk of having duplicate orders executed. Limit Orders Can Limit Risk A limit order establishes a "buy price" at the maximum you're willing to pay, or a "sell price" at the lowest you are willing to receive. Placing limit orders instead of market orders can reduce your risk of receiving an unexpected execution price. A limit order does not guarantee your order will be executed -" however, it does guarantee you will not pay a higher price than you expected. Telephone and Online Access During Volatile Markets During times of high market volatility, customers may experience delays with the Wells Fargo Online Brokerage web site or longer wait times when calling 1-800-TRADERS. It is possible that losses may be suffered due to difficulty in accessing accounts due to high internet traffic or extended wait times to speak to a telephone agent. Freeriding is Prohibited Freeriding is when you buy a security low and sell it high, during the same trading day, but use the proceeds of its sale to pay for the original purchase of the security. There is no prohibition against day trading, however you must avoid freeriding. To avoid freeriding, the funds for the original purchase of the security must come from a source other than the sale of the security. Freeriding violates Regulation T of the Federal Reserve Board concerning the extension of credit by the broker-dealer (Wells Fargo Investments, LLC) to its customers. The penalty requires that the customer's account be frozen for 90 days. Stop and Stop Limit Orders A stop is an order that becomes a market order once the security has traded through the stop price chosen. You are guaranteed to get an execution. For example, you place an order to buy at a stop of $50 which is above the current price of $45. If the price of the stock moves to or above the $50 stop price, the order becomes a market order and will execute at the current market price. Your trade will be executed above, below or at the $50 stop price. In a fast market, the execution price could be drastically different than the stop price. A "sell stop" is very similar. You own a stock with a current market price of $70 a share. You place a sell stop at $67. If the stock drops to $67 or less, the trade becomes a market order and your trade will be executed above, below or at the $67 stop price. In a fast market, the execution price could be drastically different than the stop price. A stop limit has two major differences from a stop order. With a stop limit, you are not guaranteed to get an execution. If you do get an execution on your trade, you are guaranteed to get your limit price or better. For example, you place an order to sell stock you own at a stop limit of $67. If the stock drops to $67 or less, the trade becomes a limit order and your trade will only be executed at $67 or better. Glossary All or None (AON) A stipulation of a buy or sell order which instructs the broker to either fill the whole order or don't fill it at all; but in the latter case, don't cancel it, as the broker would if the order were filled or killed. Day Order A buy or sell order that automatically expires if it is not executed during that trading session. Fill or Kill An order placed that must immediately be filled in its entirety or, if this is not possible, totally canceled. Good Til Canceled (GTC) An order to buy or sell which remains in effect until it is either executed or canceled (WellsTrade® accounts have set a limit of 60 days, after which we will automatically cancel the order). Immediate or Cancel An order condition that requires all or part of an order to be executed immediately. The part of the order that cannot be executed immediately is canceled. Limit Order An order to buy or sell a stated quantity of a security at a specified price or at a better price (higher for sales or lower for purchases). Maintenance Call A call from a broker demanding the deposit of cash or marginable securities to satisfy Regulation T requirements and/or the House Maintenance Requirement. This may happen when the customer's margin account balance falls below the minimum requirements due to market fluctuations or other activity. Margin Requirement Minimum amount that a client must deposit in the form of cash or eligible securities in a margin account as spelled out in Regulation T of the Federal Reserve Board. Reg. T requires a minimum of $2,000 or 50% of the purchase price of eligible securities bought on margin or 50% of the proceeds of short sales. Market Makers NASD member firms that buy and sell NASDAQ securities, at prices they display in NASDAQ, for their own account. There are currently over 500 firms that act as NASDAQ Market Makers. One of the major differences between the NASDAQ Stock Market and other major markets in the U.S. is NASDAQ's structure of competing Market Makers. Each Market Maker competes for customer order flow by displaying buy and sell quotations for a guaranteed number of shares. Once an order is received, the Market Maker will immediately purchase for or sell from its own inventory, or seek the other side of the trade until it is executed, often in a matter of seconds. Market Order An order to buy or sell a stated amount of a security at the best price available at the time the order is received in the trading marketplace. Specialists Specialist firms are those securities firms which hold seats on national securities exchanges and are charged with maintaining orderly markets in the securities in which they have exclusive franchises. They buy securities from investors who want to sell and sell when investors want to buy. Stop An order that becomes a market order once the security has traded through the designated stop price. Buy stops are entered above the current ask price. If the price moves to or above the stop price, the order becomes a market order and will be executed at the current market price. This price may be higher or lower than the stop price. Sell stops are entered below the current market price. If the price moves to or below the stop price, the order becomes a market order and will be executed at the current market price. Stop Limit An order that becomes a limit order once the security trades at the designated stop price. A stop limit order instructs a broker to buy or sell at a specific price or better, but only after a given stop price has been reached or passed. It is a combination of a stop order and a limit order. These articles are for information and education purposes only. You will need to evaluate the merits and risks associated with relying on any information provided. Although this article may provide information relating to approaches to investing or types of securities and investments you might buy or sell, Wells Fargo and its affiliates are not providing investment recommendations, advice, or endorsements. Data have been obtained from what are considered to be reliable sources; however, their accuracy, completeness, or reliability cannot be guaranteed. Wells Fargo makes no warranties and bears no liability for your use of this information. The information made available to you is not intended, and should not be construed as legal, tax, or investment advice, or a legal opinion.

Recommended Content


Recommended Content

Editors’ Picks

EUR/USD alternates gains with losses near 1.0720 post-US PCE

EUR/USD alternates gains with losses near 1.0720 post-US PCE

The bullish tone in the Greenback motivates EUR/USD to maintain its daily range in the low 1.070s in the wake of firmer-than-estimated US inflation data measured by the PCE.

EUR/USD News

GBP/USD clings to gains just above 1.2500 on US PCE

GBP/USD clings to gains just above 1.2500 on US PCE

GBP/USD keeps its uptrend unchanged and navigates the area beyond 1.2500 the figure amidst slight gains in the US Dollar following the release of US inflation tracked by the PCE.

GBP/USD News

Gold keeps its daily gains near $2,350 following US inflation

Gold keeps its daily gains near $2,350 following US inflation

Gold prices maintain their constructive bias around $2,350 after US inflation data gauged by the PCE surpassed consensus in March and US yields trade with slight losses following recent peaks.

Gold News

Bitcoin Weekly Forecast: BTC’s next breakout could propel it to $80,000 Premium

Bitcoin Weekly Forecast: BTC’s next breakout could propel it to $80,000

Bitcoin’s recent price consolidation could be nearing its end as technical indicators and on-chain metrics suggest a potential upward breakout. However, this move would not be straightforward and could punish impatient investors. 

Read more

Week ahead – Hawkish risk as Fed and NFP on tap, Eurozone data eyed too

Week ahead – Hawkish risk as Fed and NFP on tap, Eurozone data eyed too

Fed meets on Wednesday as US inflation stays elevated. Will Friday’s jobs report bring relief or more angst for the markets? Eurozone flash GDP and CPI numbers in focus for the Euro.

Read more

Majors

Cryptocurrencies

Signatures