|

Pfizer says South African variant could significantly reduce vaccine protection

A Reuters piece from earlier is taking up some of the news wires in financial markets as the implications are certainly a potential blow for risk appetite.

The article explained that a laboratory study suggests that the South African variant of the coronavirus may reduce antibody protection from the Pfizer Inc/BioNTech SE vaccine by two-thirds.

The news explained that it is not clear if the shot will be effective against the mutation.

''Moderna also said the actual efficacy of its vaccine against the South African variant is yet to be determined. The company has previously said it believes the vaccine will work against the variant.''

The article was published a few hours ago but is only just starting to rank on social media, so it may have limited impact in forex if it has already been priced in. 

The article's headline is also in stark contrast to that of other news agencies that seemed to be reporting on the same lab test, such as a CNN article with a headline ''Lab studies suggest Pfizer, Moderna vaccines can protect against coronavirus variant''.

''A new report published in the New England Journal of Medicine on Wednesday suggests that Pfizer-BioNTech's Covid-19 vaccine can protect people against concerning new coronavirus variants, including one first seen in South Africa called B.1.351.''

Market implications

Nevertheless, the risky high beta currencies, such as AUD, will be vulnerable to such sentiment creeping back through in a market place that is heavily reliant on a successful vaccine rollout.

Road bumps along the way, such as this, could see significant risk-off reactions. 

The SA strain, which may spread faster, was already the dominant virus variant in the Eastern and Western Cape provinces of South Africa and at least 20 other countries including Austria, US, UK, Norway and Japan, have also found cases.

However, until the market gets a more decisive update, then it is likely to be treated as just noise and investors will see through it and concentrate on more conclusive updates. 

Author

Ross J Burland

Ross J Burland, born in England, UK, is a sportsman at heart. He played Rugby and Judo for his county, Kent and the South East of England Rugby team.

More from Ross J Burland
Share:

Editor's Picks

GBP/USD clings to multi-day peaks below 1.3500

GBP/USD trades with marked gains on Friday, now giving away some gains following an earlier surpass of the key 1.3500 yardstick. Indeed, Cable gathers fresh steam amid the strong offered stance in the Greenback, all after US NFP badly missed expectations in July.

EUR/USD: Post-NFP bounce falters around 1.1580

EUR/USD reverses Thursday’s decline and trades with solid gains in the 1.1560 region, or two-month peaks, on Friday. The pair’s firm performance comes in a context of a sharp correction in the US Dollar as investors continue to assess disheartening US NFP readings.

How Wall Street rigs the game [Video]

In this week’s Live from the Vault, Andrew Maguire is joined by Peter Antico and Sean Stone to discuss the Paradigm of Money - an in-depth expose of financial market corruption, from naked shorting to the two-tier system that protects Wall Street.

XRP Price Forecast: XRP nears critical $1.00 support
Ripple (XRP) remains pressured on Friday, trading around $1.03 at the time of writing. The token appears to hold this current level as support but lacks a catalyst to sustain a knee-jerk rebound toward the next key resistance at $1.10.
Is Gold about to enter its biggest bull run since 2020?
Gold has stormed back into the spotlight and its next move could leave late buyers chasing. On August 5, the yellow metal surged almost 7% – roughly $174 – to close near $4,308 an ounce, posting one of its biggest daily advances in recent history. A weaker U.S dollar, falling Treasury yields, changing Federal Reserve expectations and renewed safe-haven demand all struck at once.
9-3: Is the Federal Reserve’s vote tally Warsh's new forward guidance?
The rate did not move. Neither did the statement, and that’s the more interesting fact. Set the July 29 Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) statement beside the one issued on June 17, and the two documents are identical apart from a single verb and a paragraph at the bottom naming three dissenters.