|

ECB Minutes: Easing bias to drop in March – Capital Economics

The account of the ECB’s January meeting suggests that the Bank will drop the easing bias from its policy statement as soon as the next meeting on 8th March, but gives few signals as to when asset purchases will end, explains Stephen Brown, European Economist at Capital Economics.

Key Quotes

“While the ECB made no changes to its policy or forward guidance in January, the previous meeting’s minutes had suggested that the Bank would “revisit” its forward guidance “early this year”. The latest minutes repeat this and add that “some members expressed a preference for dropping the easing bias”.”

“However, it was also noted that “recent volatility in the exchange rate of the euro was a source of uncertainty” for price stability. And as this meeting was held before large falls in equity prices earlier this month, policymakers may well have become more concerned about financial conditions since then. Meanwhile, there were no signs that the three options for the asset purchase programme (APP) beyond September mentioned by Mario Draghi at January’s press conference – a sudden stop, a gradual taper to zero or another extension – were discussed.”

“In all, given policymakers’ desire to alter their communications “gradually”, we think it is most likely that the Bank will remove its bias in favour of increasing the APP at the next meeting on 8th March. And it may give a clearer indication of what will happen to the APP after September at the June meeting. Ultimately, we see the ECB tapering its purchases to zero over the final three months of the year and, with inflation set to rise only gradually, waiting until September 2019 to raise interest rates.”

Author

Sandeep Kanihama

Sandeep Kanihama

FXStreet Contributor

Sandeep Kanihama is an FX Editor and Analyst with FXstreet having principally focus area on Asia and European markets with commodity, currency and equities coverage. He is stationed in the Indian capital city of Delhi.

More from Sandeep Kanihama
Share:

Editor's Picks

AUD/USD remains below 0.7000 amid light trading

AUD/USD fills a modest bearish gap on Monday, but remains below 0.7000 in the Asian session amid holiday-thinned liquidity. The US Dollar attempts a bounce even as US bond yields pull back from multi-year highs, limiting the pair. Moreover, diminishing odds of another RBA rate hike in November cap the Aussie.

USD/JPY hovers above 158.00 amid Japan/ US holiday

USD/JPY extends its range-bound price action into a new week, trading above 158.00 as bulls remain on high alert amid speculation that authorities will step in to prop up the Japanese Yen. Meanwhile, softer US bond yields keep US Dollar bulls on the back foot and cap the pair's upside. However, geopolitical uncertainties could limit losses for the safe-haven buck amid thin liquidity due to a holiday in Japan and the US.

Gold remains vulnerable below $4,200 on Fed hike bets

Gold is under mild selling pressure on Monday, trading at around $4,170. The US Dollar advances modestly in thin trading, supported by bets that the Federal Reserve will hike rates at least one more time before year-end.

Bitcoin struggles as ETF outflows, geopolitical uncertainty weigh

Bitcoin hovers around $83,600 on Monday after a 3.1% correction last week. US-listed spot ETFs recorded an outflow of $681.10 million last week, snapping the three-week inflow streak. Geopolitical uncertainty and mixed signals keep investors cautious.

The week ahead: A critical week as earnings and CPI test market

The Oil price is relatively stable this morning, and US and European stock markets are poised to open higher, as risk sentiment shrugs off an escalation in the Middle East and concerns about rising bond yields.

Has Bitcoin really escaped the macro forces it was built to fight?
Over 17 years ago, Satoshi Nakamoto designed Bitcoin (BTC) on the back of a global financial crisis as an alternative to the global monetary system outside the control of central banks, governments and traditional intermediaries. This raises a key question: has Bitcoin really become independent of the macroeconomic forces it was built to challenge?