|

Research finds stablecoin issuance doesn’t affect crypto prices

  • A study shows stablecoins operate as tools for investors to react to the market and do not influence crypto prices.
  • The analysis indicates flows are consistent with investors using stablecoins as a store of value during periods of risk.
  • The research findings directly contradict an earlier study conducted in July 2018. 

Recent research has revealed that stablecoins act as tools for investors to react to market movements and do not impact price inflation or collapse. The research was funded by the University of California Berkeley’s Haas Blockchain Initiative and was conducted by Richard Lyons, UC Berkeley’s Chief Innovation and Entrepreneurship Officer, and Ganesh Viswanath-Natraj, Assistant Professor of Finance at the Warwick Business School.

The analysis of trade data indicates flows are consistent with investors using stablecoins as a store of value during price depreciation or periods of risk. The researchers also found “strong evidence” of another catalyst for flows from issuer treasuries to secondary markets: arbitrage trading when stablecoins deviate from their pegs. 

The impact of stablecoin issuances on the price of crypto has been debated for a long time. Back in July 2018, research by John Griffins of the University of Texas at Austin and Amin Shams of the Ohio State University concluded that stablecoin issuances “are timed following market downturns and result in sizable increases in bitcoin prices.” It also claimed that stablecoin flows and subsequent price inflation in 2017 could be attributed to one entity.

Contradicting these study findings, Lyons and Viswanath-Natraj summarize their conclusions by saying:

We find no systematic evidence that stablecoin issuance affects cryptocurrency prices. Rather, our evidence supports alternative views; namely, that stablecoin issuance endogenously responds to deviations of the secondary market rate from the pegged rate, and stablecoins consistently perform a safe-haven role in the digital economy.

Author

Rajarshi Mitra

Rajarshi Mitra

Independent Analyst

Rajarshi entered the blockchain space in 2016. He is a blockchain researcher who has worked for Blockgeeks and has done research work for several ICOs. He gets regularly invited to give talks on the blockchain technology and cryptocurrencies.

More from Rajarshi Mitra
Share:

Editor's Picks

XRP sell-off deepens amid weak retail interest, risk-off sentiment

Ripple (XRP) is edging lower around $1.36 at the time of writing on Wednesday, weighed down by low retail interest and macroeconomic uncertainty, which is accelerating risk-off sentiment.

Crypto Today: Bitcoin, Ethereum, XRP extend sell-off amid negative funding rates 

Bitcoin is down 15% in February and looks poised to extend its losses toward the yearly low of $60,000. Ethereum and Ripple are following in Bitcoin's footsteps, weighed down by a weak derivatives market. 

Hyperliquid tests key support as sell-side pressure intensifies

Hyerliquid (HYPE) drops to its 50-day Exponential Moving Average (EMA) at $28.85 at the time of writing on Wednesday, extending a decline of roughly 10% so far this week. 

Stellar Price Forecast: XLM risks revisiting $0.136 as sell-off continues

Stellar is trading below $0.160 at the time of writing on Wednesday, extending its correction for the fifth consecutive day. The bearish price action is further supported by rising short bets and declining Open Interest in the derivatives market. 

Bitcoin Price Annual Forecast: BTC holds long-term bullish structure heading into 2026

Bitcoin (BTC) is wrapping up 2025 as one of its most eventful years, defined by unprecedented institutional participation, major regulatory developments, and extreme price volatility.

Bitcoin: The worst may be behind us

Bitcoin (BTC) price recovers slightly, trading at $65,000 at the time of writing on Friday, after reaching a low of $60,000 during the early Asian trading session. The Crypto King remained under pressure so far this week, posting three consecutive weeks of losses exceeding 30%.