|

Bank of America breaks support after policy shock

Bank of America is reversing sharply to the downside since the start of the year, with price gapping through the lower trendline support. The move accelerated after President Trump imposed a 10% cap on credit card loans, which triggered a sharp reversal from the all time highs. This price action suggests that we could see much more weakness ahead. If the ending diagonal is indeed complete, then any rebound toward the previously unfilled gap around 54.50 could turn into an attractive resistance zone for the next sell off, potentially targeting the 50 area on the downside.

We’ve added educational post at the end about ending diagonals, enjoy!

On the bigger picture, the stock is running into serious resistance after moving above the 2006 highs. This does not necessarily mean an immediate multi year downtrend, but higher time frame resistance combined with an ending diagonal on the daily chart is clearly a reason for caution.

Highlights

  • Sharp reversal from all time highs signals trend exhaustion.
  • Gap through lower trendline support confirms downside pressure.
  • Resistance zone on rebounds near the unfilled gap around 54.50.
  • Downside risk toward the 50 area if weakness resumes.

Educational post

Ending Diagonal — Quick summary

What it is

  • Terminal Elliott Wave pattern that appears at the end of a trend.
  • Usually forms in Wave 5 of an impulse or Wave C of an A–B–C correction.
  • Signals trend exhaustion and often precedes a sharp reversal.

Structural rules

  • Consists of five waves (1–2–3–4–5).
  • All waves subdivide into threes.
  • Wave 4 overlaps Wave 1 (required condition).
  • Price action forms a contracting or expanding wedge.

Typical behavior

  • Momentum weakens even as price makes new highs or lows.
  • Wave 5 often accelerates, trapping late entrants.
  • After completion, price usually reverses sharply, often retracing the whole pattern.

Key Fibonacci relationships

Wave 5 failures are common and strengthen reversal signals.

Wave 3 ≈ 61.8% or 100% of Wave 1.

Wave 5 ≈ 61.8% of Wave 3, or sometimes equals Wave 1.

Post-completion retracement typically 61.8%–78.6% of the entire diagonal.

Wave 4 retraces 38.2%–61.8% of Wave 3.


Get Full Access To Our Premium Elliott Wave Analysis For 14 Days. Click here.

Author

Gregor Horvat

Gregor Horvat

Wavetraders

Experience Grega is based in Slovenia and has been in the Forex market since 2003.

More from Gregor Horvat
Share:

Editor's Picks

GBP/USD remains weaker as UK-US yields narrow

GBP/USD extends its losses for the second consecutive day, trading around 1.3450 during the Asian hours. The pair depreciates as the British Pound softens even as United Kingdom political risk fades.

EUR/USD weakens amid Middle East tensions

EUR/USD extends its losses for the second consecutive day, trading around 1.1520 during the Asian hours. The currency pair faces downward pressure as the US Dollar gains strength, propelled by renewed safe-haven demand among global investors.

How Wall Street rigs the game [Video]

In this week’s Live from the Vault, Andrew Maguire is joined by Peter Antico and Sean Stone to discuss the Paradigm of Money - an in-depth expose of financial market corruption, from naked shorting to the two-tier system that protects Wall Street.

Bitcoin under pressure, Ethereum trades sideways, Ripple gravitates toward $1

Bitcoin and Ethereum remain under pressure after mild gains, while Ripple slides over 5% so far this week. BTC faces rejection near a key resistance barrier, and ETH has been trading sideways for the last 22 days. At the same time, XRP is gravitating its correction toward the key $1 support zone.

Markets question Fed's inflation resolve after July FOMC meeting
Federal Reserve Chairman Kevin Warsh continues to project a tough stance on inflation, repeatedly promising to restore price stability and keep inflation anchored at the central bank's longstanding 2% target. But according to Mike Maharrey in this week's Money Metals Midweek Memo, markets are beginning to judge the Fed by its actions rather than its rhetoric—and so far, they aren't convinced.
9-3: Is the Federal Reserve’s vote tally Warsh's new forward guidance?
The rate did not move. Neither did the statement, and that’s the more interesting fact. Set the July 29 Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) statement beside the one issued on June 17, and the two documents are identical apart from a single verb and a paragraph at the bottom naming three dissenters.