- The United States Security & Exchange Commission previously requested access to Ripple’s concerns regarding the legal status of XRP.
- Ripple Labs stated that the regulator’s requested communications are protected by attorney-client privilege.
- The judge decided to deny SEC access, marking another victory for XRP holders.
A victory for XRP holders, a public loss for the SEC
The US SEC previously asked Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn to order Ripple to produce records of legal advice around whether the sales of the XRP token were compliant with federal securities laws.
The agency claimed that Ripple’s understanding of the legal status of XRP would support its $1.3 billion lawsuit. While the blockchain firm has denied these complaints since the start of the court case in December, the SEC wanted access to Ripple’s legal concerns.
According to a public filing, Judge Sarah Netburn denied the SEC’s motion and stated:
Ripple asserts that the SEC’s requested communications are protected by the attorney-client privilege, which has not been waived.
This decision bolstered the blockchain firm’s fair notice defense based on the argument that the securities regulator failed to warn the company and other market participants that XRP was an unregistered security.
According to Jeremy Hogan, an attorney closely following the case, the decision made by Judge Netburn was “very important,” because the Judge states Ripple’s subjective beliefs regarding XRP are not relevant to the fair notice defense. This move would “block the road the SEC wanted to use to fight the defense.”
Judge Netburn clarified that her conclusion only applies to this specific issue, stating:
The Court takes no position about whether Ripple’s pleaded defense is cognizable or if it will prove meritorious.
John Deaton, an attorney and community leader for XRP holders to intervene in the legal action, believed from the start that the SEC had little chance of getting Ripple’s legal advice memo unless the crypto payments company shared it with others.
Deaton also said that while Judge Netburn’s decision was a public loss for the securities regulator, the outcome alone was not enough to force the SEC to settle the case.
Further, Deaton agreed to a statement where a community member suggested that the decision means that the judge does not believe the argument that Ripple having fair notice because the firm had legal advisory is sound.
Information on these pages contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Markets and instruments profiled on this page are for informational purposes only and should not in any way come across as a recommendation to buy or sell in these assets. You should do your own thorough research before making any investment decisions. FXStreet does not in any way guarantee that this information is free from mistakes, errors, or material misstatements. It also does not guarantee that this information is of a timely nature. Investing in Open Markets involves a great deal of risk, including the loss of all or a portion of your investment, as well as emotional distress. All risks, losses and costs associated with investing, including total loss of principal, are your responsibility. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of FXStreet nor its advertisers. The author will not be held responsible for information that is found at the end of links posted on this page.
If not otherwise explicitly mentioned in the body of the article, at the time of writing, the author has no position in any stock mentioned in this article and no business relationship with any company mentioned. The author has not received compensation for writing this article, other than from FXStreet.
FXStreet and the author do not provide personalized recommendations. The author makes no representations as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of this information. FXStreet and the author will not be liable for any errors, omissions or any losses, injuries or damages arising from this information and its display or use. Errors and omissions excepted.
The author and FXStreet are not registered investment advisors and nothing in this article is intended to be investment advice.