|

NEM Elliott Wave technical forecast [Video]

NEM Elliott Wave technical analysis

Today's Elliott Wave analysis focuses on the Australian Stock Exchange (ASX) stock NEWMONT CORPORATION (NEM). Our analysis identifies an upside potential in ASX:NEM shares and provides key price levels to monitor for potential trend shifts.

NEWMONT CORPORATION (NEM) – Elliott Wave Technical Analysis (1D Chart - Semilog Scale).

  • Function: Major trend (Intermediate degree, orange).

  • Mode: Motive.

  • Structure: Impulse.

  • Position: Wave 2 - grey of Wave (3) - orange.

Details:

Wave (2) - orange appears to have completed a Zigzag correction around 58.92, signaling a potential move toward Wave (3) - orange. If this scenario plays out, Wave (3) - orange is likely extending into wave 1,2 - grey. Once Wave 2 - grey completes, we will look for confirmation of renewed bullish momentum leading into Wave 3 - grey.

  • Invalidation point: 58.92.

Chart

NEWMONT CORPORATION (NEM) – Elliott Wave technical analysis (Four-hour chart)

  • Function: Major trend (Minor degree, grey).

  • Mode: Motive.

  • Structure: Impulse.

  • Position: Wave ((a)) - navy of Wave 2 - grey.

Details:

A closer look at ASX:NEM reveals that Wave 1 - grey has completed at 59.92, and the price is currently forming Wave 2 - grey. This corrective move is developing into a Zigzag labeled ((a))((b))((c)) - navy, with a projected decline toward 65.18 - 62.31.

Once Wave 2 - grey ends, potential long entry points will emerge, particularly at the completion of Wave ((b)) - navy, leading into Wave 3 - grey. However, if the price falls below 62.31, caution is advised as the forecast's reliability weakens, requiring a reassessment of market conditions.

  • Invalidation point: 58.92.

Chart

Conclusion

Our Elliott Wave analysis of NEWMONT CORPORATION (NEM) on ASX highlights potential price movements and key validation/invalidation levels. By identifying support and resistance zones, traders can leverage these insights to refine their strategies. The provided wave count and price projections serve to enhance confidence in trend direction while offering a professional and data-driven perspective.

Technical analyst: Hua (Shane) Cuong, CEWA-M (Master’s Designation).

NEM Elliott Wave technical analysis [Video]

Author

Peter Mathers

Peter Mathers

TradingLounge

Peter Mathers started actively trading in 1982. He began his career at Hoei and Shoin, a Japanese futures trading company.

More from Peter Mathers
Share:

Editor's Picks

GBP/USD looks for direction around 1.3500

GBP/USD alternates gains with losses around the 1.3500 neighbourhood on Tuesday. That said, Cable struggles to extend its recent marked recovery in a context of continuous instability in the Middle East, which in turn keeps the Greenback well supported.

EUR/USD treads water around 1.1540

EUR/USD struggles to gather momentum on Tuesday, trading in an inconclusive fashion around 1.1540. Indeed, the pair’s price action comes amid the absence of clear direction in the US Dollar, as traders continue to closely follow developments in the Middle East.

Gold eases from tops, challenges $4,400

Gold retreats from its earlier tops and slips back below the key $4,400 mark per troy ounce on Tuesday. The precious metal’s marginal gains comes on the back of a sidelined price action in the US Dollar amid steady uncertainty from the geopolitical landscape.

Crypto Today: Bitcoin and Ethereum consolidate, XRP dips as optimism for a US-Iran deal fades

Bitcoin (BTC) maintains a neutral outlook on Tuesday while testing support at $64,000. Investors appear to be sitting on the fence, awaiting a catalyst for a breakout above $65,000.

The inflation narrative is still way more important than the employment story
Core bonds sold off yesterday with the belly of the curve slightly underperforming in the US while European curves showed more of a bear flattening. Daily changes on the US curve varied between +4.7 bps (2-yr) and +6.4 bps (7-yr).
9-3: Is the Federal Reserve’s vote tally Warsh's new forward guidance?
The rate did not move. Neither did the statement, and that’s the more interesting fact. Set the July 29 Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) statement beside the one issued on June 17, and the two documents are identical apart from a single verb and a paragraph at the bottom naming three dissenters.