|

BoE’s Pill: Bearing down on inflationary pressures remains necessary

Bank of England (BoE) Chief Economist Huw Pill said that the BoE has put too much weight on inflation being near the target rather than looking ahead, in remarks at the parliament's Treasury Committee on Tuesday.

Key takeaways

BoE in the past has perhaps put too much weight on inflation being at target instead of future risks.
Labor market is showing signs of stabilisation.

I see risks to inflation on the upside, caution is needed.

Disinflation has been slower than anticipated.
Bearing down on inflationary pressures remains necessary.”

BoE FAQs

The Bank of England (BoE) decides monetary policy for the United Kingdom. Its primary goal is to achieve ‘price stability’, or a steady inflation rate of 2%. Its tool for achieving this is via the adjustment of base lending rates. The BoE sets the rate at which it lends to commercial banks and banks lend to each other, determining the level of interest rates in the economy overall. This also impacts the value of the Pound Sterling (GBP).

When inflation is above the Bank of England’s target it responds by raising interest rates, making it more expensive for people and businesses to access credit. This is positive for the Pound Sterling because higher interest rates make the UK a more attractive place for global investors to park their money. When inflation falls below target, it is a sign economic growth is slowing, and the BoE will consider lowering interest rates to cheapen credit in the hope businesses will borrow to invest in growth-generating projects – a negative for the Pound Sterling.

In extreme situations, the Bank of England can enact a policy called Quantitative Easing (QE). QE is the process by which the BoE substantially increases the flow of credit in a stuck financial system. QE is a last resort policy when lowering interest rates will not achieve the necessary result. The process of QE involves the BoE printing money to buy assets – usually government or AAA-rated corporate bonds – from banks and other financial institutions. QE usually results in a weaker Pound Sterling.

Quantitative tightening (QT) is the reverse of QE, enacted when the economy is strengthening and inflation starts rising. Whilst in QE the Bank of England (BoE) purchases government and corporate bonds from financial institutions to encourage them to lend; in QT, the BoE stops buying more bonds, and stops reinvesting the principal maturing on the bonds it already holds. It is usually positive for the Pound Sterling.

looking

Author

Agustin Wazne

Agustin Wazne joined FXStreet as a Junior News Editor, focusing on Commodities and covering Majors.

More from Agustin Wazne
Share:

Editor's Picks

GBP/USD falls as US Dollar receives from internal FOMC policy split

GBP/USD loses ground after three days of gains, trading around 1.3450 during the Asian hours on Friday. The pair depreciates as the US Dollar gains support from a hawkish pause by the Federal Reserve and an internal FOMC policy split.


EUR/USD softens to near 1.1500 as US-Iran war widens

The EUR/ USD pair loses ground to near 1.1515 during the early Asian trading hours on Friday. The Euro softens against the US Dollar amid risk-off sentiment and fears of wider war in the Middle East. The preliminary reading of the Harmonized Index of Consumer Prices from the Eurozone for July and the Michigan Consumer Sentiment Index will be released later on Friday. 


Gold: Looks to snap four-month losing streak but sellers refuse to give up

Gold fails to hold above $4,100 once again as sellers return early Friday. The US Dollar rebounds on fresh US-Iran tensions and month-end profit-taking. Gold closed above $4,100 on Thursday, but the daily RSI remains below 50.  

Bitcoin eyes 50-day EMA breakout, Ethereum consolidates, XRP steadies

Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Ripple trade near key technical levels on Friday as the broader cryptocurrency market pauses following last week's recovery. BTC is approaching the 50-day Exponential Moving Average while ETH continues to consolidate between two major EMAs.

9-3: Is the Federal Reserve’s vote tally Warsh's new forward guidance?
The rate did not move. Neither did the statement, and that’s the more interesting fact. Set the July 29 Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) statement beside the one issued on June 17, and the two documents are identical apart from a single verb and a paragraph at the bottom naming three dissenters.
9-3: Is the Federal Reserve’s vote tally Warsh's new forward guidance?
The rate did not move. Neither did the statement, and that’s the more interesting fact. Set the July 29 Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) statement beside the one issued on June 17, and the two documents are identical apart from a single verb and a paragraph at the bottom naming three dissenters.