|

What options do emerging market policymakers have? Part III

Summary

To wrap up this three part series, we examine overall policy space in the emerging markets. By “overall policy space” we are referring to the capacity for central banks to ease monetary policy and governments to deploy fiscal stimulus, in combination, to offset a tariff induced global growth slowdown. In this final report, we determine that most developing economies are associated with less than adequate overall scope for policy maneuvers, and should U.S. tariff policy be more contentious than we expect, the global growth deceleration could be more severe and ultimately led by emerging market nations.

Putting policy space in one place

Global growth is set to slow noticeably in 2025, and with emerging economies most vulnerable to softer external demand, developing economy growth prospects are likely to dwindle this year. In this series of reports, we raised the question: “what can policymakers do to offset soft global growth?” To get a sense of available policy options, we did a deep dive into whether central banks can ease monetary policy and if governments across the developing world can offer fiscal support. Part I of this series focused on monetary policy. We made the point that many central banks do not have adequate space to pursue easier monetary policy, and if sharply lower interest rates were delivered, financial stability, and in turn growth, could be at risk. In Part II, we highlighted how fiscal deficits have widened and debt burdens have climbed post-pandemic. Worsening public finance dynamics constrain, or in some cases eliminate, fiscal policy space available to governments across the developing world. If fiscal stimulus is extended regardless of worsening public finance positions, local financial markets could experience sharp selloff's. In this final report, we examine overall policy space. That is, the capacity for central banks to ease monetary policy and governments to deploy fiscal stimulus in combination with each other. As recent tariff rhetoric hints at more aggressive tariffs than we initially assumed, an approach including two-pronged stimulus efforts may be needed to support growth in emerging economies.

Download the Full Report!

Author

More from Wells Fargo Research Team
Share:

Editor's Picks

GBP/USD flirts with tops near 1.3470

GBP/USD manages to regain composure and challenge the area of daily highs around 1.3470 on Friday. Cable picks up pace despite marginal gains in the Greenback in a context of swelling geopolitical tensions and rising global oil prices.

EUR/USD trims losses, back above 1.1500

EUR/USD picks up some pace and bouces off earlier lows, reclaiming the 1.1500 threshold and beyond at the end of the week. The pair’s modest pullback follows a persistent risk-averse market mood and renewed buying interest for the US Dollar.

Gold: The $4,000 mark holds the downside for now

Gold faces renewed selling pressure, falling sharply toweard the $4,000 mark per troy ounce as the US Dollar regains momentum. Escalating US-Iran tensions are keeping inflation concerns and expectations of further Fed rate hikes alive, weighing further on the yellow metal.

Bitcoin eyes 50-day EMA breakout, Ethereum consolidates, XRP steadies

Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Ripple trade near key technical levels on Friday as the broader cryptocurrency market pauses following last week's recovery. BTC is approaching the 50-day Exponential Moving Average while ETH continues to consolidate between two major EMAs.

Warsh needs to restore his reputation
We were glad to see our deeply negative reaction to the Warsh press conference was not some personal peculiarity. Just about everybody in the financial press felt the same way. The consensus is building it’s not the Fed in the dog-house but only Warsh. Today the WSJ changed it tune and blasted Warsh—"the honeymoon is already over..”
9-3: Is the Federal Reserve’s vote tally Warsh's new forward guidance?
The rate did not move. Neither did the statement, and that’s the more interesting fact. Set the July 29 Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) statement beside the one issued on June 17, and the two documents are identical apart from a single verb and a paragraph at the bottom naming three dissenters.