WTI Price Analysis: Big move looks overdue

WTI's daily chart shows a Bollinger band squeeze.
Low-volatility consolidation often ends with a violent move.

Omkar Godbole FXStreet Contributor

West Texas Intermediate (WTI), the North American oil benchmark, could soon witness a big move in either direction.

That’s because, the spread between Bollinger bands – volatility indicators placed 2 standard deviations above and below the 20-day simple moving average of price - has narrowed sharply due to the 1.5-month-long sideways churn in the range of $37 to $43.

Meanwhile, the Bollinger bandwidth, also a volatility indicator calculated by dividing the spread between the volatility bands by the 20-day SMA, has declined to 0.05 the lowest level since September 2018.

A prolonged period of low volatility consolidation or bull-ber tug of war often paves the way for a strong directional move.

Focus, therefore, is on the Bollinger bands, currently located at $40.22 and $42.37, respectively.

A strong move above the upper band would imply a bullish breakout and expose resistance at $49.41 (Feb. 5 low). On the other hand, a break below the lower band would signal an end of the bounce from lows below $10 observed in April and shift risk in favor of a drop to support at $34.38 (June 15 low).

Daily chart

Trend: Neutral

Technical levels

WTI

Overview
Today last price	42.01
Today Daily Change	0.17
Today Daily Change %	0.41
Today daily open	41.84

Trends
Daily SMA20	41.39
Daily SMA50	40.03
Daily SMA100	33.16
Daily SMA200	43.17

Levels
Previous Daily High	43.1
Previous Daily Low	41.7
Previous Weekly High	43.62
Previous Weekly Low	39.75
Previous Monthly High	42.52
Previous Monthly Low	38.73
Daily Fibonacci 38.2%	42.24
Daily Fibonacci 61.8%	42.57
Daily Pivot Point S1	41.32
Daily Pivot Point S2	40.81
Daily Pivot Point S3	39.92
Daily Pivot Point R1	42.73
Daily Pivot Point R2	43.62
Daily Pivot Point R3	44.13

Author

Omkar Godbole

FXStreet Contributor

Omkar Godbole, editor and analyst, joined FXStreet after four years as a research analyst at several Indian brokerage companies.

GBP/USD flirts with tops near 1.3470

GBP/USD manages to regain composure and challenge the area of daily highs around 1.3470 on Friday. Cable picks up pace despite marginal gains in the Greenback in a context of swelling geopolitical tensions and rising global oil prices.

Gold remains below $4,100 despite receding Fed hike bets, weak USD

Gold opens with a bullish gap at the start of a new week amid receding Fed rate-hike expectations and a bearish US Dollar. Oil prices tumbled after Trump canceled an attack on Iran and said that a deal is near, easing inflation fears. This forces traders to dial back bets on extreme Fed tightening and drags the USD to a fresh low since June 17, which, in turn, is supporting the non-yielding bullion. However, the recent repeated failures to find acceptance above $4,100 warrant caution for XAU/USD bulls.

Gold: The $4,000 mark holds the downside for now

Gold faces renewed selling pressure, falling sharply toweard the $4,000 mark per troy ounce as the US Dollar regains momentum. Escalating US-Iran tensions are keeping inflation concerns and expectations of further Fed rate hikes alive, weighing further on the yellow metal.

Week ahead: US payrolls report and AI earnings to keep investors on edge

After the Fed decision, NFP report awaited for more rate hike clues. Employment also on the agenda in Canada and New Zealand. Chinese trade and Japanese wage data to be watched too. But Iran and AI headlines to remain in driver’s seat for risk sentiment.

Warsh needs to restore his reputation

We were glad to see our deeply negative reaction to the Warsh press conference was not some personal peculiarity. Just about everybody in the financial press felt the same way. The consensus is building it’s not the Fed in the dog-house but only Warsh. Today the WSJ changed it tune and blasted Warsh—"the honeymoon is already over..”

9-3: Is the Federal Reserve’s vote tally Warsh's new forward guidance?

The rate did not move. Neither did the statement, and that’s the more interesting fact. Set the July 29 Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) statement beside the one issued on June 17, and the two documents are identical apart from a single verb and a paragraph at the bottom naming three dissenters.