|

Silver Price Forecast: XAG/USD bounces off 100-hour SMA; sticks to gains near $62.50

  • Silver regains positive traction following Friday’s pullback from the all-time peak.
  • The emergence of fresh buyers near the 100-hour SMA favors the XAG/USD bulls.
  • An overbought daily RSI warrants some caution before placing fresh bullish bets.

Silver (XAG/USD) attracts fresh buyers at the start of a new week and reverses a part of Friday's retracement slide from the all-time peak, around the $64.65 region. The white metal trades above mid-$62.00s during the Asian session, up 1.25% for the day, and seems poised to prolong its recent well-established uptrend.

From a technical perspective, the XAG/USD finds decent support and bounces off the 100-hour Simple Moving Average (SMA). The subsequent move back above the $62.00 round figure validates the positive outlook. However, neutral oscillators on the 1-hour chart and a slightly overbought Relative Strength Index (RSI) on the daily chart warrant some caution for aggressive bullish traders.

This, in turn, suggests that any further move up is more likely to face some barrier near the $63.00 mark. A sustained strength beyond, however, could lift the XAG/USD towards the next relevant hurdle near the $63.80 area. Some follow-through buying beyond the $64.00 round figure will reaffirm the constructive outlook and allow bulls to challenge the record high, around the $64.65 region.

On the flip side, weakness below the $62.00 mark might still be seen as a buying opportunity near the 100-hour SMA, currently pegged near the $61.45 region. A convincing break below, however, could drag the XAG/USD below the $61.00 round figure, towards the $60.80 zone, or Friday's swing low. The latter should act as a key pivotal point, which, if broken, should pave the way for deeper losses.

Silver 1-hour chart

Silver FAQs

Silver is a precious metal highly traded among investors. It has been historically used as a store of value and a medium of exchange. Although less popular than Gold, traders may turn to Silver to diversify their investment portfolio, for its intrinsic value or as a potential hedge during high-inflation periods. Investors can buy physical Silver, in coins or in bars, or trade it through vehicles such as Exchange Traded Funds, which track its price on international markets.

Silver prices can move due to a wide range of factors. Geopolitical instability or fears of a deep recession can make Silver price escalate due to its safe-haven status, although to a lesser extent than Gold's. As a yieldless asset, Silver tends to rise with lower interest rates. Its moves also depend on how the US Dollar (USD) behaves as the asset is priced in dollars (XAG/USD). A strong Dollar tends to keep the price of Silver at bay, whereas a weaker Dollar is likely to propel prices up. Other factors such as investment demand, mining supply – Silver is much more abundant than Gold – and recycling rates can also affect prices.

Silver is widely used in industry, particularly in sectors such as electronics or solar energy, as it has one of the highest electric conductivity of all metals – more than Copper and Gold. A surge in demand can increase prices, while a decline tends to lower them. Dynamics in the US, Chinese and Indian economies can also contribute to price swings: for the US and particularly China, their big industrial sectors use Silver in various processes; in India, consumers’ demand for the precious metal for jewellery also plays a key role in setting prices.

Silver prices tend to follow Gold's moves. When Gold prices rise, Silver typically follows suit, as their status as safe-haven assets is similar. The Gold/Silver ratio, which shows the number of ounces of Silver needed to equal the value of one ounce of Gold, may help to determine the relative valuation between both metals. Some investors may consider a high ratio as an indicator that Silver is undervalued, or Gold is overvalued. On the contrary, a low ratio might suggest that Gold is undervalued relative to Silver.

Author

Haresh Menghani

Haresh Menghani is a detail-oriented professional with 10+ years of extensive experience in analysing the global financial markets.

More from Haresh Menghani
Share:

Editor's Picks

GBP/USD clings to 1.3500 amid marginal losses

GBP/USD alternates gains with losses around the 1.3500 neighbourhood on Tuesday. Indeed, Cable struggles to further extend its incipient recovery in a context of continuous instability in the Middle East and modest gains in the Greenback.

EUR/USD alternates gains with losses near 1.1540

EUR/USD navigates a tight range near 1.1550 in the latter part of Tuesday’s NA session. The US Dollar’s vacillating price action accompanies the pair while market participants gear up for the crucial US inflation data due on Wednesday.

Gold trades with positive bias below $4,400; Fed hike bets cap gains ahead of US CPI

Gold attracts some dip-buyers during the Asian session on Wednesday, stalling the previous day's retracement slide from the $4,435 region, or the highest level since June 5. The commodity, however, remains below the $4,400 mark as traders await key US inflation figures for fresh cues about the US Federal Reserve's future policy path before placing fresh directional bets on the non-yielding yellow metal.

Bitcoin risks liquidation-driven spikes amid deepening market apathy

Bitcoin has remained trapped between $60,000 and $80,000 for six consecutive months, reflecting a market increasingly defined by apathy and weak trading activity. However, such thin volumes combined with elevated open interest leave room for sudden spikes in liquidation, according to a Tuesday report by K33.

US Dollar: CPI keeps USD in tight ranges

OCBC’s Sim Moh Siong and Christopher Wong note the US Dollar softened as Fed hike expectations moderated and the US yield curve steepened. They argue that without a strong upside surprise in United States Consumer Price Index, the USD should stay rangebound, supporting carry trades.

9-3: Is the Federal Reserve’s vote tally Warsh's new forward guidance?
The rate did not move. Neither did the statement, and that’s the more interesting fact. Set the July 29 Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) statement beside the one issued on June 17, and the two documents are identical apart from a single verb and a paragraph at the bottom naming three dissenters.