|

American Express slips, and the technicals suggest more downside

American Express (AXP) pulled back sharply yesterday, falling more than 4% following news that President Trump plans to cap credit card interest rates at 10%. The reaction was immediate, and given how extended the stock had become, the move lower was not entirely surprising to me.

Leading into this drop, AXP had enjoyed a powerful run higher, rallying more than 70% off its Liberation Day lows. That kind of move naturally puts pressure on the chart, especially when momentum begins to stall. When I look at this setup, the recent decline stands out not just because of the headline, but because of what the technicals were already starting to signal.

On the daily timeframe, the stock attempted to break below its upsloping trendline during yesterday’s selloff. From a technical perspective, this is an important development. That trendline has acted as support throughout the entire rally, and when price starts to test — or threaten — that structure, I pay attention. A clean break and confirmation below that upsloping trendline would suggest that downside pressure could continue from here.

From a trading standpoint, I see two clear technical approaches. One option would be to wait for a decisive break and confirmation below the upsloping trendline. Another would be to watch for a retrace back toward that same trendline and look for rejection there. In either case, the chart is offering defined levels, which is exactly what I look for when evaluating risk.

As background, American Express is a well-established financial services company whose stock has long attracted both investors and active traders. Because of its size and visibility, AXP often reacts quickly to policy-related headlines, and those reactions can create meaningful technical setups on the chart. That combination of strong trends and headline sensitivity is part of what makes the name so actively traded.

As always, regardless of bias or setup, I focus on disciplined execution. The technicals may be shifting, but proper risk management remains essential when trading any stock, especially after a prolonged move in one direction.

Chart

Author

Lawton Ho

Lawton Ho

Verified Investing

A marketing expert sharing his journey to mastering the charts.

More from Lawton Ho
Share:

Editor's Picks

GBP/USD clings to multi-day peaks below 1.3500

GBP/USD trades with marked gains on Friday, now giving away some gains following an earlier surpass of the key 1.3500 yardstick. Indeed, Cable gathers fresh steam amid the strong offered stance in the Greenback, all after US NFP badly missed expectations in July.

EUR/USD: Post-NFP bounce falters around 1.1580

EUR/USD reverses Thursday’s decline and trades with solid gains in the 1.1560 region, or two-month peaks, on Friday. The pair’s firm performance comes in a context of a sharp correction in the US Dollar as investors continue to assess disheartening US NFP readings.

How Wall Street rigs the game [Video]

In this week’s Live from the Vault, Andrew Maguire is joined by Peter Antico and Sean Stone to discuss the Paradigm of Money - an in-depth expose of financial market corruption, from naked shorting to the two-tier system that protects Wall Street.

XRP Price Forecast: XRP nears critical $1.00 support
Ripple (XRP) remains pressured on Friday, trading around $1.03 at the time of writing. The token appears to hold this current level as support but lacks a catalyst to sustain a knee-jerk rebound toward the next key resistance at $1.10.
Is Gold about to enter its biggest bull run since 2020?
Gold has stormed back into the spotlight and its next move could leave late buyers chasing. On August 5, the yellow metal surged almost 7% – roughly $174 – to close near $4,308 an ounce, posting one of its biggest daily advances in recent history. A weaker U.S dollar, falling Treasury yields, changing Federal Reserve expectations and renewed safe-haven demand all struck at once.
9-3: Is the Federal Reserve’s vote tally Warsh's new forward guidance?
The rate did not move. Neither did the statement, and that’s the more interesting fact. Set the July 29 Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) statement beside the one issued on June 17, and the two documents are identical apart from a single verb and a paragraph at the bottom naming three dissenters.