Bitcoin Ordinals creator proposes “Runes”, a replacement for BRC-20 standard

Bitcoin Ordinals developer Casey Rodarmor came up with Runes as a means of eliminating the proliferation of unspent tokens on the network.
Runes is aimed at bringing significant transaction fee revenue, developer mindshare, and users to Bitcoin.
Ordinals have seen a massive drawdown in the unique users from the peak of 15k in June to less than a thousand at the moment.

Bitcoin in the Decentralized Finance (DeFi) space noted stellar growth earlier this year when the network witnessed the arrival of the BRC-20 standard. Akin to Ethereum’s ERC-20 standard, BRC-20 allowed the creation of fungible tokens on the network through the Ordinals protocol. However, the creator of the protocol is now suggesting a new standard in place of BRC-20.

Bitcoin BRC-20 could be replaced by Runes

Bitcoin Ordinals’ developer, Casey Rodarmor, published a post on September 25 highlighting the potential alternative to the BRC-20 token standard called “Runes”. The need for Runes, according to Rodarmor, arose from the need to eliminate the UTXO proliferation caused by BRC-20.

UTXO, also known as Unspent Transaction Output, is basically units of the digital currency remaining after a transaction is completed. Since BRC-20 is not UTXO-based, the increased demand and creation of fungible tokens have resulted in a sudden increase in the UTXOs.

To deal with this, Runes balances would be designed to be held on UTXOs, allowing a single Unspent Transaction Output to hold any amount of any number of Runes. This way, the UTXO proliferation can be responsibly managed in return, creating a fungible token protocol that might bring significant transaction fee revenue, developer mindshare, and users to Bitcoin.

Rodarmor claimed that such a protocol would very easily fit into Bitcoin’s native UTXO model. He added,

“Such a scheme might draw users from other schemes with worse on-chain footprints, and bring developer and user mindshare to Bitcoin, encouraging them to adopt Bitcoin itself.”

Bitcoin Ordinals continue to lose traction

Bitcoin Ordinals peaked around May this year but started to lose ground sometime towards the beginning of June. The marketplaces began losing daily users, and at the time of writing, over 93% of the unique daily users had disappeared. At its peak, these users amounted to more than 15K, while presently, less than 1,000 unique daily users have been registered on the Ordinals marketplace.

Bitcoin Ordinals daily unique users

The current condition of the crypto market is arguably not enticing to users or investors. However, from a technical perspective, if Runes manages to draw the attention of developers, it could have a positive impact on the course of Bitcoin DeFi.

Like this article? Help us with some feedback by answering this survey:

Share: Cryptos feed

Information on these pages contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Markets and instruments profiled on this page are for informational purposes only and should not in any way come across as a recommendation to buy or sell in these assets. You should do your own thorough research before making any investment decisions. FXStreet does not in any way guarantee that this information is free from mistakes, errors, or material misstatements. It also does not guarantee that this information is of a timely nature. Investing in Open Markets involves a great deal of risk, including the loss of all or a portion of your investment, as well as emotional distress. All risks, losses and costs associated with investing, including total loss of principal, are your responsibility. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of FXStreet nor its advertisers. The author will not be held responsible for information that is found at the end of links posted on this page.

If not otherwise explicitly mentioned in the body of the article, at the time of writing, the author has no position in any stock mentioned in this article and no business relationship with any company mentioned. The author has not received compensation for writing this article, other than from FXStreet.

FXStreet and the author do not provide personalized recommendations. The author makes no representations as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of this information. FXStreet and the author will not be liable for any errors, omissions or any losses, injuries or damages arising from this information and its display or use. Errors and omissions excepted.

The author and FXStreet are not registered investment advisors and nothing in this article is intended to be investment advice.

Join Telegram