When I am speaking in Australia, New Zealand, and the U.K., all of whom have big real estate bubbles, I always ask: How do you think this is good for your country that it costs so much to live, and so much investment and attention goes to speculating in real estate instead of producing real goods and services?

Now, I will admit that healthy real estate prices are a good thing; it says you are an attractive city or country to live in with a good standard of living, good schools, and low crime, etc.

But nosebleed levels like eight to 10 and even 20 times everyday incomes to buy an everyday house? Then there are higher wages paid to employees by businesses to compensate for that higher standard of living and higher office, store, warehouse and plant costs. Isn’t that one of the reasons we are losing key industries to lower cost countries?

And then there’s lower spending in other sectors, like eating out, entertainment, travel, and cars to compensate for higher housing costs…

High real estate prices past a normal level of three to four times income in good cities only benefits the older people who already own real estate and who are going to work and produce less, and then die. It kills the standard of living for the new up-and-coming generation. It only encourages more focus on fixing up and flipping homes instead of investing in productive capacity to produce real goods and services and for export and global competitiveness.

Productive investment would be reflected in money velocity, as I covered a few weeks back. And yes, if you look at the countries that have the most overvalued real estate nationally, this clearly seems to be the case. The U.S. and Canada have some highly very overvalued major cities and areas, but they are not as overvalued nationally (3.9 and 4.3 respectively) as countries like Hong Kong, China, Australia, the U.K and Switzerland.

Note that the valuations here are median home prices vs. median household income. These ratios get more extreme at average levels that favor the more affluent that are the most overvalued. For example, Hong Kong is almost twice as high on average price to income, at 36 times income.

No surprise, Hong Kong has the lowest money velocity in the world at 0.26, with the very highest real estate valuations at 20.9 times income. This is the home of “closet condos.” China, with the same strategy of overbuilding and households overinvesting in real estate, is next at 0.50 velocity and valuations in their top two cities at 16.0 and 15.0 times.

Then comes Australia with velocity at 0.88 vs. 1.12 in the U.S., despite dramatically better demographic trends and lower overall debt ratios. It’s top two cities, Sydney and Melbourne, are 11.7 and 9.2 times, respectively – the second most overvalued in the world after China.

Then comes expensive Switzerland at an abysmal velocity of 0.53. I think that is partly due to extreme wealth and urbanization already and nowhere to expand. But its price to high incomes in its lead cities are 9.4 in Geneva and 8.4 in Zurich. Higher than London…

Then finally comes the U.K. at 0.66 velocity and its leading city London at 8.3 times. That’s way below the U.S. at 1.12 and the euro countries at 1.01. Too much focus on real estate investing and flipping?

The countries and cities with the highest real estate valuations will crash the most to be brought back down to reality. And that will be good medicine for their awful addiction — and for future growth again…

And, they wouldn’t have bubbled up so much, if they weren’t so special!

But back to the original question: Do you want to make money on real estate gains for your oldest citizens, or increase your competitiveness as a nation for your future generations?

The content of our articles is based on what we’ve learned as financial journalists. We do not offer personalized investment advice: you should not base investment decisions solely on what you read here. It’s your money and your responsibility. Our track record is based on hypothetical results and may not reflect the same results as actual trades. Likewise, past performance is no guarantee of future returns. Certain investments such as futures, options, and currency trading carry large potential rewards but also large potential risk. Don’t trade in these markets with money you can’t afford to lose. Delray Publishing LLC expressly forbids its writers from having a financial interest in their own securities or commodities recommendations to readers.

Analysis feed

Latest Forex Analysis

Editors’ Picks

Bears ignore Aussie holidays, cheer coronavirus news at fresh multi-week low near 0.6815

AUD/USD drops to 0.6814, with an intra-day low of 0.6811, during the early Monday morning in Asia. The fears of China’s coronavirus outbreak are dominating the market’s risk sentiment off-late.


USD/JPY: Coronavirus bearish gap breaks below 109

USD/JPY has dropped heavily in the open, breaking below the 109 handle to print a fresh low of 108.88 as traders prepare for a risk-off week when considering the implications of the Coronavirus. 


Are you anxious about Coronavirus? Well, so are the markets

There's so much we don't know about Coronavirus, which increases the level of concern from public health officials, you & I as well as the markets and we can expect a risk-off start to the week ahead of a pretty major schedule.

Read more

Gold rebounds above $1560

The XAU/USD pair dropped to a daily low of $1556.70 during the European trading hours as the easing worries over coronavirus becoming a global epidemic and a broad-based USD strength put the pair under bearish pressure.

Gold News

GBP ends week on a weak note despite upbeat PMI data

The GBP/USD pair spiked to its highest level since January 7th at 1.3174 on Friday with the initial reaction to the upbeat PMI data from the UK. The pair could remain choppy ahead of BoE’s policy decision. 


Forex Majors