|

Could this be the Straw that Breaks the Market’s Back?

The thing about financial markets is that the companies that dominate change… the leaders of those companies and the personalities that capture the market’s attention change… regulations and regulators change…

But human nature never changes.

And we have short memories.

Today, investors are stepping into the same traps that burned them in prior market cycles. Specifically, the margin-debt trap.

As calculated by the New York Stock Exchange, margin debt is at an all-time high.

All. Time. High.

At the end of March, margin debt topped out at nearly $537 billion. Even in today’s world, that’s still a lot of money!

But, that’s not the whole story.

The actual credit balances are a negative $231 billion. That compares to negative $152 billion in March 2016.

But, how does this compare to the last two major butt kickings investors got this century, when stock markets were overvalued and investors too bullish and loaded up to their eyeballs in margin debt?

It’s not even close.

In the 2000 Tech Bubble, credit balances were a negative $179 billion ($52 billion less than current levels) by August of that year. Those negative balances expanded right up until the point the market tipped over.

The trend in negative credit balances called the top in the market.

We all know how that ended.

By June 2007, negative balances topped at $79 billion. But, by October of 2007 they had turned flat.

A year later, as Lehman Brothers was imploding, they were flat again.

Today, credit balances are consistently 10-times higher from month to month than they were leading up to the Financial Crisis!

TEN TIMES!

We are in the mother of all bubbles.

And under these circumstances, it only takes a small hiccup to empty the tea cup and wipe out investors’ accounts.

Margin calls exacerbate the downside. Always have. Always will.

Adding fuel to the tinder is the Securities and Exchange Commission’s recent, bizarre move.

They’ve allowed the operation of funds that offer 400% the daily return of the market.

There are a lot of flaws in levered exchange-traded funds (such as how daily rebalancing impacts the returns) but the fact that there’s demand for a four-times levered product shows that the lunatics are now running the asylum.

“Happy Days,” the wonderful show on TV during my formative years, went downhill after the episode where Fonzie jumped a shark. With an all-time high in negative credit balances and investors clamoring for even more leverage, the market has officially jumped the shark.

It’s not going to end in happy days.

That is, unless you know how to play this market. Here’s how my Forensic Investor readers are going to do it.

Author

More from Dent Research Team of Analysts
Share:

Editor's Picks

GBP/USD flirts with tops near 1.3470

GBP/USD manages to regain composure and challenge the area of daily highs around 1.3470 on Friday. Cable picks up pace despite marginal gains in the Greenback in a context of swelling geopolitical tensions and rising global oil prices.

EUR/USD trims losses, back above 1.1500

EUR/USD picks up some pace and bouces off earlier lows, reclaiming the 1.1500 threshold and beyond at the end of the week. The pair’s modest pullback follows a persistent risk-averse market mood and renewed buying interest for the US Dollar.

Gold: The $4,000 mark holds the downside for now

Gold faces renewed selling pressure, falling sharply toweard the $4,000 mark per troy ounce as the US Dollar regains momentum. Escalating US-Iran tensions are keeping inflation concerns and expectations of further Fed rate hikes alive, weighing further on the yellow metal.

Bitcoin eyes 50-day EMA breakout, Ethereum consolidates, XRP steadies

Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Ripple trade near key technical levels on Friday as the broader cryptocurrency market pauses following last week's recovery. BTC is approaching the 50-day Exponential Moving Average while ETH continues to consolidate between two major EMAs.

Warsh needs to restore his reputation
We were glad to see our deeply negative reaction to the Warsh press conference was not some personal peculiarity. Just about everybody in the financial press felt the same way. The consensus is building it’s not the Fed in the dog-house but only Warsh. Today the WSJ changed it tune and blasted Warsh—"the honeymoon is already over..”
9-3: Is the Federal Reserve’s vote tally Warsh's new forward guidance?
The rate did not move. Neither did the statement, and that’s the more interesting fact. Set the July 29 Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) statement beside the one issued on June 17, and the two documents are identical apart from a single verb and a paragraph at the bottom naming three dissenters.