|

USD/RUB to see a dip as markets price out harsh US sanctions – Credit Suisse

Economists at Credit Suisse see scope for further short-term decline in USD/RUB and stick to a long-held range view of 72.00-76.00, as markets re-assess rouble’s tail risks around the possibility of harsh US sanctions.

A halt to the central bank’s FX purchase program could be a first line of defence in case the rouble is under pressure again 

“Two factors seem to underpin markets’ nervousness about the current conflict between Russia and Ukraine. The first is the historical context. The Russia/Ukraine conflict in 2014 led to Russian annexation of Crimea and was the primary catalyst for US and EU decisions to create a sanctions regime targeted at Russia. The second source of nervousness is the idea that before the recent tension between Russia and Ukraine emerged investors ‘only’ needed to assess the US administration’s willingness and readiness to upscale its response to events such as the imprisonment of Alexei Navalny or the SolarWinds hack. Whereas under the new set of circumstances investors also need to take into account the possibility of Russian actions to a degree which could induce the US and the EU to impose new sanctions on Russia.”

“The scope for a summit between Biden and Putin ‘in the coming months’ and Biden’s intention to establish a ‘stable and predictable interaction’ are likely to incentive markets to price out the risk that the US will deliver harsh sanctions on Russia in coming weeks or that the tensions between Russia and Ukraine will rise materially. From this perspective our long-held target range for USD/RUB (72.00-76.00) still looks relevant for the short-run.” 

“If we are wrong and the tensions between Russia and Ukraine do intensify then we could imagine USD/RUB breaks above our target range and tests last week’s high of 78.04. In this scenario further rises in USD/RUB above that level (e.g. to 80.00) could led to some policy support in the form of a central bank’s decision to halt its fiscal-rule-based FX purchases which currently run at about $110mn per day.” 

Author

FXStreet Team

Composed of a group of economic journalists and FX experts, the FXStreet content team produces and oversees all content published on FXStreet. It provides a purely journalistic approach to the Forex market.

More from FXStreet Team
Share:

Editor's Picks

GBP/USD flirts with tops near 1.3470

GBP/USD manages to regain composure and challenge the area of daily highs around 1.3470 on Friday. Cable picks up pace despite marginal gains in the Greenback in a context of swelling geopolitical tensions and rising global oil prices.

EUR/USD trims losses, back above 1.1500

EUR/USD picks up some pace and bouces off earlier lows, reclaiming the 1.1500 threshold and beyond at the end of the week. The pair’s modest pullback follows a persistent risk-averse market mood and renewed buying interest for the US Dollar.

Gold: The $4,000 mark holds the downside for now

Gold faces renewed selling pressure, falling sharply toweard the $4,000 mark per troy ounce as the US Dollar regains momentum. Escalating US-Iran tensions are keeping inflation concerns and expectations of further Fed rate hikes alive, weighing further on the yellow metal.

Bitcoin eyes 50-day EMA breakout, Ethereum consolidates, XRP steadies

Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Ripple trade near key technical levels on Friday as the broader cryptocurrency market pauses following last week's recovery. BTC is approaching the 50-day Exponential Moving Average while ETH continues to consolidate between two major EMAs.

Warsh needs to restore his reputation
We were glad to see our deeply negative reaction to the Warsh press conference was not some personal peculiarity. Just about everybody in the financial press felt the same way. The consensus is building it’s not the Fed in the dog-house but only Warsh. Today the WSJ changed it tune and blasted Warsh—"the honeymoon is already over..”
9-3: Is the Federal Reserve’s vote tally Warsh's new forward guidance?
The rate did not move. Neither did the statement, and that’s the more interesting fact. Set the July 29 Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) statement beside the one issued on June 17, and the two documents are identical apart from a single verb and a paragraph at the bottom naming three dissenters.