- Ribbon Finance, a suite of DeFi protocols that supports traders poses serious risks according to analysts.
- The platform is providing undercollateralized lending for market makers like Wintermute, and suffers from capital inefficiency.
- Analysts argue that in the event Wintermute faces a credit crunch, retail lenders won’t stand a chance to recover their funds.
Analysts believe Ribbon Finance’s lend product is a serious risk for retail lenders. Ribbon lend offers uncollateralized lending to approved market markers (MM) and in cases like Wintermute, the platform failed to take note of the MM’s credit profile.
Also read: JUST IN: Mastercard will help banks offer crypto trading services to clients
Ribbon Finance’s lending platform has a capital inefficiency problem
Forecastoor, a pseudonymous crypto trader and analyst evaluated uncollateralized lending platforms and the risks they pose to retail lenders. The analyst identified that both Ribbon Finance and Clearpool Fin have lent to market maker Wintermute however the rates differed. Ribbon Finance charges 7% Annual Percentage Rate (APR) while Clearpool Fin charges 11.64% APR based on Wintermute’s credit profile.
Marketmaker Wintermute recently lost $160 million to a DeFi hack and repaid its $92 million TrueFi loan one day before the due date. The popular market maker has lost considerably large sums of money to hacks in the DeFi ecosystem and its credit profile is severely compromised.
Forecastoor argues that in the event that Wintermute faced a credit crunch, the market maker would have a high incentive to borrow its entire liquidity requirement from the Ribbon Finance Lending Pool (LP). This would essentially mean all lenders would be locked in and unable to withdraw their funds.
Ribbon Finance’s lending product has no predefined loan tenure – meaning deadline for repaying the debt – therefore as long as the market maker pays back minimum interest, they can avoid default. However, this also means retail lenders would remain locked in and unable to withdraw their capital since it could not be classed as a technical default.
Retail lenders stand no chance even if the sentiment turns bearish and all liquidity from the pool is withdrawn. Withdrawals are processed on a first-come-first-serve basis and any available liquidity will therefore get removed by Ethereum arbitrage trading bots (MEV bots).
Retail lenders need to be cautious with Ribbon Finance
The analyst therefore recommends that retail traders be cautious when lending with Ribbon Finance and be aware of the serious risks possed by the platform’s lending product.
5/
— forecastooor (@forecastooor) October 17, 2022
Suppose Wintermute faces a credit crunch, what would they do?
They will have a high incentive to simply borrow the entire liquidity from the LP. Lenders are essentially rugged since they can’t withdraw when the pool liquidity gets emptied.
Information on these pages contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Markets and instruments profiled on this page are for informational purposes only and should not in any way come across as a recommendation to buy or sell in these assets. You should do your own thorough research before making any investment decisions. FXStreet does not in any way guarantee that this information is free from mistakes, errors, or material misstatements. It also does not guarantee that this information is of a timely nature. Investing in Open Markets involves a great deal of risk, including the loss of all or a portion of your investment, as well as emotional distress. All risks, losses and costs associated with investing, including total loss of principal, are your responsibility. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of FXStreet nor its advertisers. The author will not be held responsible for information that is found at the end of links posted on this page.
If not otherwise explicitly mentioned in the body of the article, at the time of writing, the author has no position in any stock mentioned in this article and no business relationship with any company mentioned. The author has not received compensation for writing this article, other than from FXStreet.
FXStreet and the author do not provide personalized recommendations. The author makes no representations as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of this information. FXStreet and the author will not be liable for any errors, omissions or any losses, injuries or damages arising from this information and its display or use. Errors and omissions excepted.
The author and FXStreet are not registered investment advisors and nothing in this article is intended to be investment advice.
Recommended Content
Editors’ Picks
SEC doubles down on TRON's Justin Sun lawsuit dismissing claims over jurisdiction
The SEC says it has jurisdiction to bring Justin Sun to court as he traveled extensively to the US. Sun asked to dismiss the suit, arguing that the SEC was targeting actions taken outside the US.
XRP fails to break past $0.50, posting 20% weekly losses
XRP trades range-bound below $0.50 for a sixth consecutive day, accumulating 20% losses in the last seven days. Ripple is expected to file its response to the SEC’s remedies-related opening brief by April 22.
ImmutableX extends recovery despite $69 million IMX token unlock
ImmutableX unlocked 34.19 million IMX tokens worth over $69 million early on Friday. IMX circulating supply increased over 2% following the unlock. The Layer 2 blockchain token’s price added nearly 3% to its value on April 19.
Bitcoin Weekly Forecast: BTC post-halving rally could be partially priced in Premium
Bitcoin price briefly slipped below the $60,000 level for the last three days, attracting buyers in this area as the fourth BTC halving is due in a few hours. Is the halving priced in for Bitcoin? Or will the pioneer crypto note more gains in the coming days?
Bitcoin: BTC’s rangebound movement leaves traders confused
Bitcoin (BTC) price has been hovering around the $70,000 psychological level for a few weeks, resulting in a rangebound movement. This development could lead to a massive liquidation on either side before a directional move is established.