|

The decision highlights a stark conflict

At today’s highly anticipated Federal Open Market Committee meeting—his very first as Federal Reserve Chair—Kevin Warsh will maintain a firm "wait-and-see" stance, keeping the benchmark interest rate steady in the 3.5% to 3.75% range.

The decision highlights a stark conflict between conflicting economic data and intense political pressure from President Donald Trump to slash borrowing costs.

On one hand, Warsh is facing an economy running hot: overall inflation jumped to a worrying 4.2% in May (with the Fed’s preferred Core PCE gauge sitting uncomfortably high at 3.3%), heavily driven by the recent energy price shocks stemming from the war with Iran. Paired with a firmly resilient labor market and robust employment figures that show no immediate danger of a downturn, standard economic theory signals that the Fed should actually be biased toward raising rates, not cutting them.

​President Trump continues to vocally demand rate cuts to juice economic activity, a message that holds significant weight as the bond market shows severe strain under a massive national debt load. With the cost of servicing this growing federal debt becoming increasingly unsustainable, lowering interest rates would offer immediate fiscal relief.

Caught in this crosscurrent—balancing an inflation spike that demands restrictive policy against a debt-burdened economy being squeezed by high borrowing costs, I believe—Chair Warsh will choose to hold his cards close to his chest.

By keeping rates unchanged and hinting at removing the central bank's previous bias toward easing, Warsh's opening move is a classic "hold and pray" approach: waiting to see if a developing geopolitical peace deal will naturally cool down energy-driven CPI figures before he is forced to make a high-stakes choice.

Author

Hany Saleeb

Hany Saleeb

Independent Analyst

Hany Saleeb is a highly experienced Senior Treasurer. With over a decade of experience in treasury, served as Head of Treasury at BM in France and head of research in Sinai Securities.

More from Hany Saleeb
Share:

Editor's Picks

AUD/USD keeps the red near 0.6950 after weak Aussie jobs data

AUD/USD holds losses near 0.6950 on disappointing Australian jobs data, extending the previous day's retracement slide from the monthly high and hitting a fresh weekly low during Thursday’s Asian session. Meanwhile, declining US bond yields drag the US Dollar away from the April 2025 high, touched after Wednesday's hot US CPI, helping limit losses for the currency pair.

USD/JPY slides back below 158.00 as USD reverses post-CPI gains

USD/JPY extends the previous day's pullback from a three-week high, attracting follow-through selling and sliding below 158.00 during Thursday's Asian session. Traders remain on high alert amid speculation that authorities will step in to prop up the Japanese Yen. The US Dollar, meanwhile, reverses Wednesday's hot CPI-led gains to April 2025 highs as US bond yields retreat on China bond-buying talk, further pressuring the pair.

Gold pares intraday gains, trades below $4,150 as Fed hike bets cap upside

Gold struggles to capitalize on its strong Asian session move up on Thursday and currently trades below $4,150. The commodity, however, retains an intraday bullish bias, snapping a three-day losing streak to a one-week low, touched on Wednesday, amid a broadly weaker US Dollar (USD). 

Zcash declines as US inflation surprise offsets fresh ETF inflows
Zcash (ZEC) is trading in the red on Friday, extending its previous day’s roughly 6% losses as the broader cryptocurrency market falls on rising US inflation. The US Consumer Price Index (CPI) print came in higher than expected, at an annual increase of 3.7% versus the expected 3.6%, raising concerns about inflation and rate hikes.
China seems routing US Treasury holdings through Canada

According to a Bloomberg report, China seems to be moving United States securities to non-US custodian banks in other countries, masking its role in financing US deficits.

Has Bitcoin really escaped the macro forces it was built to fight?
Over 17 years ago, Satoshi Nakamoto designed Bitcoin (BTC) on the back of a global financial crisis as an alternative to the global monetary system outside the control of central banks, governments and traditional intermediaries. This raises a key question: has Bitcoin really become independent of the macroeconomic forces it was built to challenge?