|

WTI price rebounds from $66 mark amid a risk-aversion environment

  • WTI hits December 2022 lows around $66 amid Credit Suisse crisis, causing a shift in global financial conditions.
  • Investors fading optimism for 2023 growth outlook drives Oil prices lower.
  • IEA reports a drop in Russian Oil exports and an increased global oil stockpile. 
WTI price rebounds from $66 mark amid a risk-aversion environment

West Texas Intermediate (WTI) prices hit lows not seen since December 2022, with the three-day sharp decline finding its floor around the $66 mark. Short-term relief arrived on Thursday after a backup plan was introduced for Credit Suisse's worsening financial conditions. Following Silicon Valley Bank's (SVB) fallout, Credit Suisse was next in line to address its troublesome liquidity issue, causing its shares to plunge heavily.

The WTI price dropped earlier this week due to sudden shifts in global financial conditions, led by historically high borrowing costs. As investors' optimistic growth outlook for 2023 fades, falling oil prices are inevitable.

With a diminishing global growth outlook, investors are abating risk assets like oil and equity complexes, and are rushing to purchase bonds in a risk-averse environment.

The International Energy Agency (IEA) published comments on Wednesday stating that Russian oil exports fell by more than 500k bpd in February. The global oil stockpile has risen to around 7.8 billion barrels, the highest level since September 2021, indicating a slower pace of oil consumption. Despite a pessimistic global growth outlook, the IEA has raised its global oil demand forecast for 2023 from 100 million bpd to 102 Mbpd.

In the medium to short term, WTI prices are likely to be driven by risk sentiment, with the downside bias remaining intact.

Levels to watch

WTI US OIL

Overview
Today last price68.48
Today Daily Change0.07
Today Daily Change %0.10
Today daily open68.41
 
Trends
Daily SMA2076.24
Daily SMA5077.5
Daily SMA10079
Daily SMA20086.09
 
Levels
Previous Daily High72.69
Previous Daily Low65.81
Previous Weekly High80.99
Previous Weekly Low74.89
Previous Monthly High80.75
Previous Monthly Low72.5
Daily Fibonacci 38.2%68.44
Daily Fibonacci 61.8%70.06
Daily Pivot Point S165.25
Daily Pivot Point S262.09
Daily Pivot Point S358.37
Daily Pivot Point R172.13
Daily Pivot Point R275.85
Daily Pivot Point R379.01
Share:

Editor's Picks

GBP/USD flirts with tops near 1.3470

GBP/USD manages to regain composure and challenge the area of daily highs around 1.3470 on Friday. Cable picks up pace despite marginal gains in the Greenback in a context of swelling geopolitical tensions and rising global oil prices.

EUR/USD trims losses, back above 1.1500

EUR/USD picks up some pace and bouces off earlier lows, reclaiming the 1.1500 threshold and beyond at the end of the week. The pair’s modest pullback follows a persistent risk-averse market mood and renewed buying interest for the US Dollar.

Gold: The $4,000 mark holds the downside for now

Gold faces renewed selling pressure, falling sharply toweard the $4,000 mark per troy ounce as the US Dollar regains momentum. Escalating US-Iran tensions are keeping inflation concerns and expectations of further Fed rate hikes alive, weighing further on the yellow metal.

Bitcoin eyes 50-day EMA breakout, Ethereum consolidates, XRP steadies

Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Ripple trade near key technical levels on Friday as the broader cryptocurrency market pauses following last week's recovery. BTC is approaching the 50-day Exponential Moving Average while ETH continues to consolidate between two major EMAs.

Warsh needs to restore his reputation
We were glad to see our deeply negative reaction to the Warsh press conference was not some personal peculiarity. Just about everybody in the financial press felt the same way. The consensus is building it’s not the Fed in the dog-house but only Warsh. Today the WSJ changed it tune and blasted Warsh—"the honeymoon is already over..”
9-3: Is the Federal Reserve’s vote tally Warsh's new forward guidance?
The rate did not move. Neither did the statement, and that’s the more interesting fact. Set the July 29 Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) statement beside the one issued on June 17, and the two documents are identical apart from a single verb and a paragraph at the bottom naming three dissenters.