|

Commodities: Forward curves and carry framework – Societe Generale

Societe Generale’s Michael Haigh and Jeremy Sellem note that the commodity complex has been resilient to Middle East tensions, with Oil gains capped and forecasts for prices at $70 by year end unchanged. They introduce a cross-commodity term-structure model that builds continuous forward curves, fills contract gaps, and supports pricing, hedging, basket construction and de-seasonalised carry signals across BCOM and GSCI markets.

Cross-commodity term structure and carry

"Despite major Middle East headlines, the commodity complex barely moved. The BCOM gained 2% on the week, less than a standard weekly move this year. Prices briefly firmed midweek following the end of the ceasefire and the resumption of strikes by both sides."

"Oil was the main driver, rising about 10% from $72 to $78/bbl in three days before pulling back later in the week. The rally appears capped for now, and our forecasts published last week remain unchanged ($70 by year end)."

"Attention is gradually shifting toward agricultural markets and the widely anticipated return of El Niño later this year. Agricultural commodities are up 7% this month, with softs up 8% this week alone."

"We introduce a model for basket-level curve analysis that will ultimately make the relative value carry trade easier to apprehend. Our approach combines the economic intuition of commodity term structure theory with a practical interpolation framework."

"This framework produces consistent monthly forward prices out to two years across 27 commodity markets. It fills gaps where contracts are listed only quarterly or seasonally and extends maturities beyond the final observable contract when needed."

(This article was created with the help of an Artificial Intelligence tool and reviewed by an editor. Know more.)

Author

FXStreet Insights Team

The FXStreet Insights Team is a group of journalists that handpicks selected market observations published by renowned experts. The content includes notes by commercial as well as additional insights by internal and external analysts.

More from FXStreet Insights Team
Share:

Editor's Picks

AUD/USD remains below 0.7000 amid light trading

AUD/USD fills a modest bearish gap on Monday, but remains below 0.7000 in the Asian session amid holiday-thinned liquidity. The US Dollar attempts a bounce even as US bond yields pull back from multi-year highs, limiting the pair. Moreover, diminishing odds of another RBA rate hike in November cap the Aussie.

USD/JPY hovers above 158.00 amid Japan/ US holiday

USD/JPY extends its range-bound price action into a new week, trading above 158.00 as bulls remain on high alert amid speculation that authorities will step in to prop up the Japanese Yen. Meanwhile, softer US bond yields keep US Dollar bulls on the back foot and cap the pair's upside. However, geopolitical uncertainties could limit losses for the safe-haven buck amid thin liquidity due to a holiday in Japan and the US.

Gold drifts higher above $4,200 on surging ETF inflows, markets await US inflation data this week

Gold price gains ground to near $4,215 during the early Asian session on Monday. The precious metal extends the rally amid rising demand for bullion-backed exchange-traded funds and a weaker US Dollar. Yellow metal receives some support from rising investment demand, with inflows into gold-backed exchange-traded funds reaching a four-year high, according to Bloomberg data.

Week ahead: US CPI, France’s budget crisis and Q3 earnings to set the market tone
The US dollar held relatively strong this week, despite the disappointing US jobs report on October 2, which further decreased the probability of a back-to-back rate hike by the Fed at the upcoming gathering on October 28.
Middle East War updates: New attack launched on Saudi airport
Here’s a brief recap of the key developments in the Middle East war that occurred over the weekend, which are expected to have a significant impact on markets in the upcoming week. In the world of financial jargon the two widely used terms “risk-on” and “risk off'' refer to the level of risk that investors are willing to stomach during the period referenced.
Has Bitcoin really escaped the macro forces it was built to fight?
Over 17 years ago, Satoshi Nakamoto designed Bitcoin (BTC) on the back of a global financial crisis as an alternative to the global monetary system outside the control of central banks, governments and traditional intermediaries. This raises a key question: has Bitcoin really become independent of the macroeconomic forces it was built to challenge?