|

Azuki Elementals launch raises controversial $38 million worth of Ethereum in under 15 minutes

  • Azuki Elementals launch marked the most engaging NFT drops in a long time, an outcome linked to 10,000 ETH profile pictures showcased in the sale.
  • Despite the remarkable raise, the milestone is controversial, as creators have been flagged for foul play.
  • As the hype dies down, holders and rival creators criticize the look of the digital collectibles, citing imitation and odd imperfections.
  • Consequently, the artworks' floor price has slumped by almost 35%.

Azuki Elementals launch returned the spark in the non-fungible token (NFT) space lost when the bear market hit. Specifically, it recorded an amazing NFT drop, with hype and excitement that can only be compared to what was witnessed when Bored Ape Yacht Club debuted. Nevertheless, the watershed moment quickly turned sour, and now the digital collectibles are suffering the brunt of negative publicity.

Also Read: Ethereum foray into NFT inscriptions could drive ETH transactions fees higher

Azuki Elementals launch turns a watershed moment into controversy

Azuki Elementals launch, an NFT drop, made headlines showcasing 10,000 Ethereum (ETH) profile pictures. In a stunning turn of events, the digital collectibles sold out in under 15 minutes, with the project's creators, Chiru Labs, collecting a striking $38 million worth of ETH in that timeframe.

Initially, the Azuki NFTs auctioned for 2 ETH, the equivalent of approximately $3,782 at present rates. This was alongside an additional 10,000 NFTs freely airdropped to holders of the Elementals.

In a shocking turn of events, however, the artwork reveal has delivered a bearish force, killing the excitement among this group of Web 3 studio experts as they saw their artwork's floor price descend around 35% from 2ETH to 1.32 ETH, the equivalent of $2,496.

The artwork reveal marked the onset of complaints about the appearance of the Azuki Elementals. Specifically, holders say the Elementals mimic the original anime-inspired Azuki profile pictures.  

Besides this, there are several unusual imperfections with the digital collectibles, with one holder mocking how a magical wand lacks a handle.

Citing the pseudonymous Solana Legend and managing partner at Frictionless Capital on the matter:

Azuki managed to nuke the perception of the new collection and the genesis at the same time? Extremely impressive.

The similarity of the Azuki NFTs did not miss the eye of Milady Maker NFT project co-founder Charlotte Fang, who called them out for being "basically identical" to the original collection.

As negative publicity spreads, the hype around Azuki NFTs continues to subside, directly affecting their market value. Already, a section of Azuki NFT holders now wants nothing to do with the artwork, selling the Elementals at rates far below the mint price. At the time of writing, the floor price has slumped an additional 21% to the current Azuki listing price of 1.6 ETH (approximately $3,025 at current rates) on OpenSea.

The original Azuki project is also affected by this FUD, recording a 30% value slump to 9.69 ETH, approximately $18,300.

Ethereum foray into NFTs could drive ETH transactions fees higher

As reported, Ethereum has ventured into the NFT space, with alot to show for it. Besides the Azuki case, the network recently integrated NFT inscriptions, Joining Bitcoin (BTC) to allow users to create and share digital works via Ethereum transaction calldata.

  This was barely a week after Music platform Sound.xyz added support for Ethereum Layer-2 (L2) Optimism with a tribute to co-founder Vitalik Buterin.

The transaction fees are bound to increase as more transactions (representing volume) are carried out on the network. As Ethereum-based NFTs become popular, increased transactions are expected. This has a directly proportional relationship with fees. 

Notably, minting an NFT on Ethereum generally costs between $60 and $250, depending on the time of day and the stress on the network. As more users compete for inclusion in the next block of the chain, fees worsen.

Author

Lockridge Okoth

Lockridge is a believer in the transformative power of crypto and the blockchain industry.

More from Lockridge Okoth
Share:

Editor's Picks

Hyperliquid Price Forecast: HYPE rises on commodities demand amid US-Iran war

Hyperliquid (HYPE) steadies above $33 at press time on Tuesday, marking its fourth consecutive day of recovery in a broadly volatile market due to the ongoing US-Israel strikes on Iran.

Stellar Price Forecast: XLM risks deeper losses as derivatives metrics turn negative

Stellar is trading red below $0.16 at the time of writing, after a slight recovery the previous day. Weakening derivatives data caps the recovery, while an unfavorable technical outlook projects a deeper correction for the XLM token in the upcoming days.

Aave Price Forecast: AAVE tests channel resistance as ParaFi Capital deposit, bearish derivatives data caps upside

Aave (AAVE) trades around $120 on Tuesday, testing the channel resistance, signaling that sellers remain active in the zone. Lookonchain data shows that ParaFi Capital transferred 42,000 AAVE tokens to Coinbase Prime over the past 10 hours, often interpreted as a potential selling signal.

CME Group's futures suite now covers over 75% of total crypto market cap

CME Group announced that its crypto futures offering now covers over 75% of the total digital asset market cap, following the launch of its Cardano (ADA), Chainlink (LINK) and Stellar (XLM) products.

Bitcoin Price Annual Forecast: BTC holds long-term bullish structure heading into 2026

Bitcoin (BTC) is wrapping up 2025 as one of its most eventful years, defined by unprecedented institutional participation, major regulatory developments, and extreme price volatility.

Bitcoin: Another month of losses, and it’s been five

Bitcoin (BTC) price is stabilizing around $68,000 at the time of writing on Friday, but the Crypto King is poised to close February on a fragile footing, marking its fifth consecutive month of losses since October and a rare start to the year with back-to-back monthly corrections.