|

Trump 2.0 and rising restrictive global trade policy

Summary

Over the past 15 years, trade policies implemented by countries around the world have led to economic fragmentation and deglobalization. Tariffs come to mind as the instrument disrupting trade integration the most; however, evidence suggests changes to tariff policies may have actually supported global trade cohesion, at least since the Global Financial Crisis in 2008-2009. Regardless, Trump 2.0 trade policy proposals could flip that narrative in a significant way, leading to a more deglobalized world and trade fragmentation. But while the impact on the real economy could be severe, global financial markets seem to be more comfortable digesting tariff headlines and more harmful trade policies.

Trump 2.0 & rising restrictive global trade policy

We have noted in multiple previous reports how the global economy is in a state of deglobalization. Meaning, the global economy is less interconnected today than it was 15 or so years ago. Reduced global inter-connectivity and a fragmenting global economy is arguably one of the most interesting long-term trends and seems to be a topic that is continuously unfolding. While the Global Financial Crisis of 2008-2009 (GFC) started the second era of deglobalization, the rise in trade protectionism around the world post-GFC exacerbated this deglobalization trend. The years immediately following the GFC saw a rise in protectionist trade policies; however, inward-looking trade policies picked up pace in 2016 with Brexit and the policies pursued by the first Trump administration. Protectionist trade policies gathered momentum over the course of Trump 1.0 and COVID, but also as a result of nearshoring and attempts to remove China from global supply chains, as well as military conflicts in Europe and the Middle East. According to Global Trade Alert, governments around the world responded to each of these developments by implementing more inward-looking and “harmful” trade policies (i.e., policies that reduce global trade cooperation) rather than policies that liberalize trade (i.e., more integrative global trade policies). In fact, over the past 15 years, harmful trade policy interventions have significantly outpaced interventions to liberalize trade. Since 2010, authorities around the world have imposed over 15,200 cumulative harmful trade restrictions as opposed to just over 5,600 cumulative policies designed to promote cross-border trade. Through the early months of 2025, data suggest that global trade policy is currently the most restrictive and protectionist it has been in the post-Global Financial Crisis era as harmful trade policies continue to be implemented at a more rapid pace relative to free trade types of policies.

Download the Full Report!

Author

More from Wells Fargo Research Team
Share:

Editor's Picks

GBP/USD remains offered; bears target 1.3600

GBP/USD now leaves behind part of its recent recovery and revisits the low 1.3600s at the beginning of the week. Indeed, Cable trades with a mild downward bias amid decent gains in the Greenback as investors remain wary of upcoming US data releases and the Jackson Hole event.

EUR/USD remains sidelined above 1.1650

EUR/USD trades on the defensive following the closing bell on Wall Street on Monday, hovering around the 1.1660 region and adding to Friday’s small decline. The pair’s pullback comes in response to an acceptable rebound in the US Dollar in a context of generalised caution ahead of key US data releases and Chair Warsh’s speech in Jackson Hole.

Gold advances to over three-month high as bulls look to reclaim $4,700

Gold climbs to a fresh high since mid-May, with bulls now eyeing $4,700 and extending the rally witnessed since the beginning of this month. The US Treasury's bond market intervention failure fuels concerns about fiscal sustainability and boosts demand for bullion as an alternative store of value. Moreover, the US Dollar struggles to attract any meaningful buyers, which, along with receding bets for an immediate Fed rate hike, continues to benefit the non-yielding yellow metal.

XRP surged 72%, but is the rally really about XRP?
Ripple (XRP) surged more than 72% in less than a week, its strongest rally since July 2025, as cryptocurrency prices broadly broke out. But the move has a problem: it may have little to do with XRP itself. The token's near-term rally appears to have been driven largely by a broader liquidity shift after the US Treasury expanded long-end bond buybacks, pulling yields lower and lifting risk assets.
Convulsion in credit markets
The United States government just posted a $432.3 billion deficit for July, the largest monthly shortfall since March of 2021. That single burst of red ink pushed the yeartodate deficit to $1.8 trillion, with two months still remaining in fiscal 2026. At this pace, Washington will soon wax nostalgic for the “good old days” when annual deficits were only $2 trillion.
$20 billion offered, $2 billion taken: Why Treasury doubled its buyback cap

The US Treasury moved off its own calendar on Wednesday, and that is the part worth sitting with. At 12:32 GMT, the department said it would at least double the size of liquidity support buyback operations in the 10-year to 20-year and 20-year to 30-year sectors, lifting the maximum from $2 billion per operation to at least $4 billion, effective September 9 and running to November 4.