|

Trump 2.0 and rising restrictive global trade policy

Summary

Over the past 15 years, trade policies implemented by countries around the world have led to economic fragmentation and deglobalization. Tariffs come to mind as the instrument disrupting trade integration the most; however, evidence suggests changes to tariff policies may have actually supported global trade cohesion, at least since the Global Financial Crisis in 2008-2009. Regardless, Trump 2.0 trade policy proposals could flip that narrative in a significant way, leading to a more deglobalized world and trade fragmentation. But while the impact on the real economy could be severe, global financial markets seem to be more comfortable digesting tariff headlines and more harmful trade policies.

Trump 2.0 & rising restrictive global trade policy

We have noted in multiple previous reports how the global economy is in a state of deglobalization. Meaning, the global economy is less interconnected today than it was 15 or so years ago. Reduced global inter-connectivity and a fragmenting global economy is arguably one of the most interesting long-term trends and seems to be a topic that is continuously unfolding. While the Global Financial Crisis of 2008-2009 (GFC) started the second era of deglobalization, the rise in trade protectionism around the world post-GFC exacerbated this deglobalization trend. The years immediately following the GFC saw a rise in protectionist trade policies; however, inward-looking trade policies picked up pace in 2016 with Brexit and the policies pursued by the first Trump administration. Protectionist trade policies gathered momentum over the course of Trump 1.0 and COVID, but also as a result of nearshoring and attempts to remove China from global supply chains, as well as military conflicts in Europe and the Middle East. According to Global Trade Alert, governments around the world responded to each of these developments by implementing more inward-looking and “harmful” trade policies (i.e., policies that reduce global trade cooperation) rather than policies that liberalize trade (i.e., more integrative global trade policies). In fact, over the past 15 years, harmful trade policy interventions have significantly outpaced interventions to liberalize trade. Since 2010, authorities around the world have imposed over 15,200 cumulative harmful trade restrictions as opposed to just over 5,600 cumulative policies designed to promote cross-border trade. Through the early months of 2025, data suggest that global trade policy is currently the most restrictive and protectionist it has been in the post-Global Financial Crisis era as harmful trade policies continue to be implemented at a more rapid pace relative to free trade types of policies.

Download the Full Report!

Author

More from Wells Fargo Research Team
Share:

Editor's Picks

AUD/USD bulls regain control above 0.6950 amid USD retreat

AUD/USD regains traction and extends the previous day's bounce from the weekly low, aiming for 0.7000 in Asia on Friday. The overnight pullback in US bond yields keeps the US Dollar below an 18-month high, which in turn offers some support to the pair. Meanwhile, hawkish RBA expectations also keep the major underpinned.

USD/JPY holds gains near 158.00 after Japan's weak Household Spending data

USD/JPY clings to gains around 158.00 after data showed on Friday that Japan's Household Spending fell for the ninth straight month, undermining the Japanese Yen. Meanwhile, the US Dollar remains depressed as the overnight fall in US bond yields counters a hawkish Fed and geopolitical uncertainties, could cap any downside in the pair.

Gold remains range-bound below $4,200

Gold has given up some ground after an initial bullish attempt to reach weekly highs, returning to below the $4,200 mark per troy ounce on Friday. The US Dollar’s strong upside momentum, combined with rising US Treasury yields across the curve, seems to keep further gains in the yellow metal under scrutiny.

Has Bitcoin really escaped the macro forces it was built to fight?
Over 17 years ago, Satoshi Nakamoto designed Bitcoin (BTC) on the back of a global financial crisis as an alternative to the global monetary system outside the control of central banks, governments and traditional intermediaries. This raises a key question: has Bitcoin really become independent of the macroeconomic forces it was built to challenge?
The Euro is not the sick man of Europe. France's bond market is
EUR/USD remains under pressure, near the 17-month low of 1.1161 reached on Monday. The pair has lost more than 7% since its yearly peak, as concerns over France's public finances increasingly weigh on the single currency. But behind the weakness of the Euro (EUR), the problem does not necessarily lie with the European economy as a whole.
Has Bitcoin really escaped the macro forces it was built to fight?
Over 17 years ago, Satoshi Nakamoto designed Bitcoin (BTC) on the back of a global financial crisis as an alternative to the global monetary system outside the control of central banks, governments and traditional intermediaries. This raises a key question: has Bitcoin really become independent of the macroeconomic forces it was built to challenge?