|

Oil is caught in a whirlwind of geopolitical tensions

The oil market is on a wild ride, caught in a whirlwind of geopolitical tension, OPEC+ strategy shifts, and a slowdown from its biggest customer, China. Right now, three major forces are throwing crude prices into chaos: (1) the escalating Middle East conflict driving up the geopolitical risk premium, (2) uncertainty surrounding OPEC+/Saudi Arabia’s next production move, and (3) China’s sharp, unexpected drop in oil demand. But here's the twist—traders seem to care more about the supply-demand dynamics than the latest geopolitical drama.

Despite Iran firing missiles at Israel and the drumbeat of war in the region, crude hasn’t exploded. Sure, prices are up 10%, but that rise comes off a pretty low base. Traders are banking on the idea that this conflict won’t lead to long-term disruptions in oil production from key players like Saudi Arabia and the UAE. Even if Iran’s 3.4 million barrels per day (3.3% of global supply) gets knocked offline, OPEC+ has about 5.5 million barrels per day in spare capacity to cover the loss. The market is clearly betting that geopolitical tension won’t morph into a full-blown oil supply shock.

But here’s the kicker: the real threat to crude isn’t war, it’s oversupply. OPEC+ looks ready to reverse its voluntary 2.2 million bpd cuts starting in December, setting the stage for a flood of oil. At their latest meeting, the group hinted they’re sticking to the plan, with cartel output set to rise by 205,000 barrels per day each month in 2025. Saudi Arabia’s cracking the whip to ensure non-compliant members fall in line, even mulling over slashing its official selling price to enforce discipline. Non-OPEC+ players like Brazil, Guyana, Norway, and the U.S. are also cranking up production, adding even more oil to the supply equation.

Hence, short-sellers are sitting pretty right now—they didn’t jump in at the bottom of the market like some amateurs, although the oil tourists are back in the game, pushing prices higher. The seasoned players have been comfortably riding the short side for a while, waiting for their moment. But here’s where things get interesting: crude likely needs to break through the $80-$82 mark to really get the market buzzing. That’s when tongues will start wagging, and the real action begins.

Honestly, it wouldn’t be shocking to see prices blast through $85 in no time if tensions escalate further. The pressure’s been building, and if the right geopolitical spark hits, we could see the floodgates open for a sharp rally. Traders are on edge, and a break above that key level might be the catalyst that sends everything into high gear.

But if we crack $90 on full-blown escalation? That’s when the oil pit goes into overdrive. Panic could ripple through the market; at that point, a massive short squeeze could send prices soaring. A $100 overshoot might sound crazy, but in this environment, it’s far from impossible. If the right mix of geopolitical flare-ups and supply concerns hit, we could be looking at a wild ride in crude.

Meanwhile, the demand side is crumbling, especially in China, where oil consumption has nosedived. China’s typical growth in oil demand—around 600,000 barrels per day—has slumped to just 200,000 barrels. This is a seismic shift, considering the International Energy Agency (IEA) originally forecasted a 700,000-barrel increase for 2024. Is this just a blip, or are we witnessing the start of a longer-term trend? Smart money is betting on the latter, thanks to China’s rapid adoption of electric vehicles (which now make up over 50% of new car sales) and its aggressive expansion of high-speed rail. China may not be at peak oil demand yet, but the trend is clear: demand is shrinking faster than anyone expected.

In a nutshell, oil prices are getting tossed around between two major forces. On one side, there's the Middle East powder keg and OPEC+’s shaky production discipline. On the other, a slowing Chinese economy and the looming threat of oversupply are casting long shadows over the market. Buckle up—the next few weeks could be make-or-break for crude prices into 2025 as the battle between supply and demand heats up.

Author

Stephen Innes

Stephen Innes

SPI Asset Management

With more than 25 years of experience, Stephen has a deep-seated knowledge of G10 and Asian currency markets as well as precious metal and oil markets.

More from Stephen Innes
Share:

Editor's Picks

GBP/USD flirts with tops near 1.3470

GBP/USD manages to regain composure and challenge the area of daily highs around 1.3470 on Friday. Cable picks up pace despite marginal gains in the Greenback in a context of swelling geopolitical tensions and rising global oil prices.

EUR/USD trims losses, back above 1.1500

EUR/USD picks up some pace and bouces off earlier lows, reclaiming the 1.1500 threshold and beyond at the end of the week. The pair’s modest pullback follows a persistent risk-averse market mood and renewed buying interest for the US Dollar.

Gold: The $4,000 mark holds the downside for now

Gold faces renewed selling pressure, falling sharply toweard the $4,000 mark per troy ounce as the US Dollar regains momentum. Escalating US-Iran tensions are keeping inflation concerns and expectations of further Fed rate hikes alive, weighing further on the yellow metal.

Bitcoin eyes 50-day EMA breakout, Ethereum consolidates, XRP steadies

Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Ripple trade near key technical levels on Friday as the broader cryptocurrency market pauses following last week's recovery. BTC is approaching the 50-day Exponential Moving Average while ETH continues to consolidate between two major EMAs.

Warsh needs to restore his reputation
We were glad to see our deeply negative reaction to the Warsh press conference was not some personal peculiarity. Just about everybody in the financial press felt the same way. The consensus is building it’s not the Fed in the dog-house but only Warsh. Today the WSJ changed it tune and blasted Warsh—"the honeymoon is already over..”
9-3: Is the Federal Reserve’s vote tally Warsh's new forward guidance?
The rate did not move. Neither did the statement, and that’s the more interesting fact. Set the July 29 Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) statement beside the one issued on June 17, and the two documents are identical apart from a single verb and a paragraph at the bottom naming three dissenters.