|

Inside the currency market: Fed funds averages

The Effective Fed Funds rate from monthly averages 1 to 32 years reveals the same story as last December / January. Although Averages improved. The shape of Averages is contained as a Bell Curve by humped in the middle while left and right tails trade low yet acceptable.

 Humped in the middle, best described as Leptokurtic was the result to Bernanke and Yellen's 0 interest rate policy. Without Bernanke and Yellen policies, averages would actually trade as a flat line across all averages.

Averages from 1 to 7 years trade overbought yet the degree of overbought lacks any concept to extremes. The extremes to low and overbought averages are located from 8 to 25 years. Averages from 25 to 32 years are actually in good shape.

Based on averages 1 to 7 years and 25 to 32, Powell and the Fed actually accommodates the possibility to raise if necessary. The distribution of averages would then form a Leptokurtic curve as the middle hump rises but thins and the right and left tails flatten further.

The problem to Fed Funds at 5.33 and 32 year monthly averages is 5.33 is not captured by the data. Fed Funds by speculation trades around the 50 year average and the same location as DXY at 99.00 and GBP/JPY at the 37 ad 38 year monthly averages at 181.07 and 184.14.

The proximity to 5.33 is 4.70 and the vital line to break to possible  rate cuts. At 4.70 is followed by many averages at 2.00's and located from 25 to 32 averages.

Targets are located at 4.00's across the board from averages 25 to 32. This means about 100 points to possible drops or 25 points X 4.

Powell and the Fed lack an immediate urgency to slash rates. Longer term, an interest and exchange rate lack any possibility to trade at 50 year averages.

The proper location for Fed Funds and DXY and to declare healthy markets is trade at averages 1 to 10 years. DXY and Fed Funds would then not only match perfectly to SPX 500 but far better movements would be seen. SPX at 82 points per month for 2023 is the result of misplaced DXY and Fed Funds.

Author

Brian Twomey

Brian Twomey

Brian's Investment

Brian Twomey is an independent trader and a prolific writer on trading, having authored over sixty articles in Technical Analysis of Stocks & Commodities and Investopedia.

More from Brian Twomey
Share:

Editor's Picks

AUD/USD falters just above 0.7000; looks at the jobs data

AUD/USD has briefly managed to surpass the 0.7000 threshold on Wednesday, although the move rapidly dissipated following higher-than-estimated US inflation data in September, which has eventually lent extra legs to the Greenback. Moving forward, the release of the labour market report will take centre stage in Australia on Thursday.

USD/JPY consolidates near 158.50; looks to US CPI for fresh impetus

USD/JPY stays range-bound near 158.50 in the Asian session on Wednesday, with looming intervention risks supporting the Japanese Yen and capping upside amid a softer US Dollar. However, geopolitical uncertainties act as a tailwind for the safe-haven USD and the pair. Traders also seem hesitant ahead of the release of the latest US inflation figures.

Gold remains offered below $4,100

Gold adds to the weekly bearish tone and slips back below the $4,100 mark per troy ounce on Wednesday. Indeed, the precious metal continues to suffer the stronger US Dollar and rising US Treasury yields as bets for extra tightening by the Fed remain on the rise following US inflation figures.

Bitcoin and Gold Forecast: BTC and XAU drop after hot US CPI
Bitcoin (BTC) is edging lower toward $82,000 on Wednesday as headwinds from sticky inflation in the United States (US) force investors to reevaluate their positioning. Gold (XAU/USD) remains under sustained selling pressure, trading below $4,100 and falling for a third consecutive day. As the correction intensifies, a retest of key $4,000 support appears likely unless bearish momentum abates.
Stock futures just went red on the CPI. Here's what the bond market is pricing that equities haven't caught up to
Since late June, the bond market has been pricing in a Federal Reserve (Fed) that keeps raising rates into 2027, and most US stocks have already been marked down for it. The S&P 500 hasn't, because a handful of AI-linked giants make up much of the index and their prices haven't followed the rest.
Has Bitcoin really escaped the macro forces it was built to fight?
Over 17 years ago, Satoshi Nakamoto designed Bitcoin (BTC) on the back of a global financial crisis as an alternative to the global monetary system outside the control of central banks, governments and traditional intermediaries. This raises a key question: has Bitcoin really become independent of the macroeconomic forces it was built to challenge?