|

Gold flows into ETFs flipped positive in July as investors buy the dip

Gold flows into ETFs flipped positive globally in July. After two consecutive months of outflows, every region reported positive flows of metal into gold-backed funds in July.

With Europe leading the way, gold ETFs reported net gold inflows of 23.5 tonnes in July, valued at $3 billion.

Assets under management (AUM) by gold-backed funds rose 1 percent to $530 billion. ETFs currently hold 4,068 tonnes of the yellow metal.

Year-to-date, ETFs have added a net 39 tonnes of gold to their collective holdings valued at $11 billion.

The World Gold Council pinpointed three factors driving the ETF turnaround in July:

  1. Diversification amid tech volatility
  2. Selective bargain hunting as prices fell
  3. Policy and geopolitical uncertainty, particularly an unclear monetary policy outlook and the ongoing war in Iran

European ETFs reported the second-strongest month of inflows this year in July, adding 17.3 tonnes of gold valued at around $2 billion.

Funds based in the UK and Switzerland led the surge.

According to the World Gold Council, it appears investors in Europe “rebuilt their positions” following a big selloff in June, as lower prices created buying opportunities.

“This mirrors the pattern seen earlier in the year, when European funds led the rebound following March's sharp U.S.-led outflows, suggesting investors were willing to add exposure after periods of market weakness.”

Asian funds reported a 4.8-tonne increase in gold holdings valued at $116 million. Chinese funds led the way with investors seeking a safe haven.

The CSI 300 Stock Index recorded its worst month since January 2016. Meanwhile, falling local yields reduced the opportunity cost of holding gold.

Japanese-listed funds reported outflows as rising local yields diverted investor demand.

Indian funds reported modest inflows of $157 million.

North American funds reported inflows of just 0.3 tonnes valued at $71 million. The World Gold Council called it a “tentative recovery” after two months of significant outflows.

North America remains the only region reporting net gold outflows for the year.

Funds in other regions, including Africa and Australia, reported gold inflows of 1 tonne valued at $140 million. ETFs listed in South Africa and Australia led the way.

ETFs are a convenient way for investors to play the gold market, but owning ETF shares is not the same as holding physical gold.

ETFs are relatively liquid. You can buy or sell an ETF with a couple of mouse clicks. You don’t have to worry about transporting or storing metal. In a nutshell, it allows investors to play the gold market without buying full ounces of metal at the spot price. 

Since you are just buying a number in a computer, you can easily trade your ETF shares for another stock or cash whenever you want, even multiple times on the same day. Many speculative investors take advantage of this liquidity.

But while a gold ETF is a convenient way to play gold's price, you don’t possess any gold. You have paper. And you don’t know for sure that the fund has all the gold either, especially when it sees inflows. In such a scenario, there have been difficulties or delays in obtaining physical metal.

Trading volumes

Global market liquidity averaged $356 billion per day in July, down 3.5 percent month-on-month.

Over-the-counter trading volumes also fell, ticking lower by about 3.4 percent to $205 billion per day.

Despite the decline, both LBMA volumes and Shanghai trading activity remained above their 2025 averages.

Total COMEX longs dropped modestly by 4.4 percent to 542 tonnes.

Managed money appears to be rebuilding its position, with longs adding 11 tonnes.

The World Gold Council described the current position as “near neutral.”

“Gold continues to be weighed down by the effects of the war in the Middle East, which has reinforced inflation risks and supported the dollar and yields, adding to the opportunity-cost headwind facing gold.”


To receive free commentary and analysis on the gold and silver markets, click here to be added to the Money Metals news service.

Author

Mike Maharrey

Mike Maharrey

Money Metals Exchange

Mike Maharrey is a journalist and market analyst for MoneyMetals.com with over a decade of experience in precious metals. He holds a BS in accounting from the University of Kentucky and a BA in journalism from the University of South Florida.

More from Mike Maharrey
Share:

Editor's Picks

GBP/USD remains offered near 1.3450

GBP/USD gives away its initial advance, trading with decent losses in the mid-1.3400s on Thursday. Conflicting signals around the Middle East continue to weigh on sentiment, prompting Cable to fade two daily advances in a row.

EUR/USD bounces off lows, back to 1.1520

EUR/USD now manages to gather some traction following an earlier pullback toward the vicinity of 1.1500 on Thursday. The pair’s decent retracement comes in response to the firmer tone in the US Dollar in a context of reignited concerns over the Strait of Hormuz.

How Wall Street rigs the game [Video]

In this week’s Live from the Vault, Andrew Maguire is joined by Peter Antico and Sean Stone to discuss the Paradigm of Money - an in-depth expose of financial market corruption, from naked shorting to the two-tier system that protects Wall Street.

XRP Price Forecast: Sell-off persists, bears aim for $1.00 as Ripple eyes on-chain multi-signature upgrade
Ripple (XRP) remains pressured, trading below $1.05 at the time of writing on Thursday. The token has declined for the fourth consecutive day this week, reflecting lethargic sentiment in the broader cryptocurrency market despite the possibility of easing geopolitical tensions in the Middle East.
The Fed is doing the exact opposite of what it should be doing
About the Yen: The WSJ has a front-page story about how the Fed is doing the exact opposite of what it should be doing—lending dollars to Japan to buy yen. “Put simply: America is printing dollars so Japan can buy yen.
9-3: Is the Federal Reserve’s vote tally Warsh's new forward guidance?
The rate did not move. Neither did the statement, and that’s the more interesting fact. Set the July 29 Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) statement beside the one issued on June 17, and the two documents are identical apart from a single verb and a paragraph at the bottom naming three dissenters.