|

Equities: AI profitability doubts grow – Nordea

Nordea analysts Kirsti Sunde Midttun and Ole Håkon Eek-Nielsen argue that AI profitability faces structural pressure from high inference costs, rapid model depreciation and growing competition from free and open alternatives. They question the durability of current business models and point to rising investor scepticism toward AI-related equities, alongside a rotation from technology stocks into cyclical, defensive and value-oriented sectors.

Nordea questions AI margin durability

"With the AI buildout now driving a meaningful share of US growth, we examine the sustainability of the underlying business models and whether the recent market scepticism is warranted."

"Despite AI's rapid growth, we see several challenges to profitability and present a more sceptical view of the industry's prospects."

"The net effect is that inference costs remain the central economic challenge for AI developers, and a key reason why the leading model companies are, for now, not profitable."

"Frontier models are, in short, best understood as infrastructure with an unusually short useful life: the value must be extracted before the technology is obsolete."

"Publishing capable models free of charge suppresses willingness to pay across the market and undercuts the business models of developers who charge for access."

"Taken together, the picture is this: frontier models are expensive to build, they depreciate within months, and they face growing competition not just from each other but from free, open alternatives."

"Over the summer, we have also seen some scepticism towards AI-related equities. This has led to a notable rotation out of tech stocks and into cyclical, defensive, and value-oriented sectors."

(This article was created with the help of an Artificial Intelligence tool and reviewed by an editor. Know more.)

Author

FXStreet Insights Team

The FXStreet Insights Team is a group of journalists that handpicks selected market observations published by renowned experts. The content includes notes by commercial as well as additional insights by internal and external analysts.

More from FXStreet Insights Team
Share:

Editor's Picks

GBP/USD clings to multi-day peaks below 1.3500

GBP/USD trades with marked gains on Friday, now giving away some gains following an earlier surpass of the key 1.3500 yardstick. Indeed, Cable gathers fresh steam amid the strong offered stance in the Greenback, all after US NFP badly missed expectations in July.

EUR/USD: Post-NFP bounce falters around 1.1580

EUR/USD reverses Thursday’s decline and trades with solid gains in the 1.1560 region, or two-month peaks, on Friday. The pair’s firm performance comes in a context of a sharp correction in the US Dollar as investors continue to assess disheartening US NFP readings.

How Wall Street rigs the game [Video]

In this week’s Live from the Vault, Andrew Maguire is joined by Peter Antico and Sean Stone to discuss the Paradigm of Money - an in-depth expose of financial market corruption, from naked shorting to the two-tier system that protects Wall Street.

XRP Price Forecast: XRP nears critical $1.00 support
Ripple (XRP) remains pressured on Friday, trading around $1.03 at the time of writing. The token appears to hold this current level as support but lacks a catalyst to sustain a knee-jerk rebound toward the next key resistance at $1.10.
Is Gold about to enter its biggest bull run since 2020?
Gold has stormed back into the spotlight and its next move could leave late buyers chasing. On August 5, the yellow metal surged almost 7% – roughly $174 – to close near $4,308 an ounce, posting one of its biggest daily advances in recent history. A weaker U.S dollar, falling Treasury yields, changing Federal Reserve expectations and renewed safe-haven demand all struck at once.
9-3: Is the Federal Reserve’s vote tally Warsh's new forward guidance?
The rate did not move. Neither did the statement, and that’s the more interesting fact. Set the July 29 Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) statement beside the one issued on June 17, and the two documents are identical apart from a single verb and a paragraph at the bottom naming three dissenters.