|

ECB’s Lagarde: “No evidence yet” of inflation de-anchoring that would warrant stronger ECB action

European Central Bank (ECB) President Christine Lagarde said on Monday that policymakers are not yet seeing signs that the latest inflation shock requires a more aggressive policy response, even as geopolitical tensions add fresh uncertainty to the Eurozone outlook. Speaking before a European Parliament committee hearing on June 22, Lagarde said there was “no evidence yet of de-anchoring or second-round effects” that would justify a more forceful monetary policy stance.

Key takeaways:

No evidence yet of de-anchoring or second-round effects warranting more forceful policy action.

The ECB remains confident that, with appropriate monetary policy action, inflation will return to target.

The Iran war is weighing on activity, while data points to a slowdown, especially in services.

The outlook remains uncertain, with upside risks for inflation and downside risks for economic growth.

The current inflation shock appears to be smaller in magnitude than the previous one.”

Lagarde downplays inflation risks, leaving Euro bulls cautious

The FXS Speech Tracker score of 4.6/10, below Lagarde’s historic 6/10 average, signals a mildly dovish tilt as the speech stresses no evidence of de-anchoring or second-round effects that would justify more forceful tightening. Emphasis on the fact that current inflation shocks are smaller than in the previous episode, and confidence that inflation will return to target with “appropriate” policy action, point to a preference for a gradual, data-dependent stance rather than aggressive hikes. This makes it a modest negative for the Euro.

At the same time, Lagarde highlights the war in Iran weighing on activity, a slowdown in services, and an outlook marked by upside risks to inflation and downside risks to growth, underscoring a potentially stagflationary backdrop. This mix of softer growth and still-uncertain inflation keeps the ECB in a cautious wait-and-see mode, limiting immediate Euro upside while preventing a fully dovish re-pricing as markets weigh the risk of renewed price pressure.

Author

Agustin Wazne

Agustin Wazne joined FXStreet as a Junior News Editor, focusing on Commodities and covering Majors.

More from Agustin Wazne
Share:

Editor's Picks

GBP/USD remains offered near 1.3450

GBP/USD gives away its initial advance, trading with decent losses in the mid-1.3400s on Thursday. Conflicting signals around the Middle East continue to weigh on sentiment, prompting Cable to fade two daily advances in a row.

EUR/USD drops to two-day lows; focus is back to 1.1500

EUR/USD’s daily decline picks up pace and approaches the 1.1500 neighbourhood following the closing bell in Euroland on Thursday. The pair’s pullback comes in response to the firmer tone in the US Dollar in a context of reignited concerns over the Strait of Hormuz.

How Wall Street rigs the game [Video]

In this week’s Live from the Vault, Andrew Maguire is joined by Peter Antico and Sean Stone to discuss the Paradigm of Money - an in-depth expose of financial market corruption, from naked shorting to the two-tier system that protects Wall Street.

XRP Price Forecast: Sell-off persists, bears aim for $1.00 as Ripple eyes on-chain multi-signature upgrade
Ripple (XRP) remains pressured, trading below $1.05 at the time of writing on Thursday. The token has declined for the fourth consecutive day this week, reflecting lethargic sentiment in the broader cryptocurrency market despite the possibility of easing geopolitical tensions in the Middle East.
The Fed is doing the exact opposite of what it should be doing
About the Yen: The WSJ has a front-page story about how the Fed is doing the exact opposite of what it should be doing—lending dollars to Japan to buy yen. “Put simply: America is printing dollars so Japan can buy yen.
9-3: Is the Federal Reserve’s vote tally Warsh's new forward guidance?
The rate did not move. Neither did the statement, and that’s the more interesting fact. Set the July 29 Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) statement beside the one issued on June 17, and the two documents are identical apart from a single verb and a paragraph at the bottom naming three dissenters.