|

AI trade splits as Broadcom sells off and MAGS tests support

Broadcom did not report bad earnings, yet it still sold off yesterday after an initial push higher.

Markets were not looking for a normal beat. They wanted Broadcom to smash expectations, especially on future AI revenue guidance. The company delivered strong numbers, but in a market already priced for AI perfection, strong was not enough.

Metric

Reported

Expected

Result

Revenue

$22.19B

~$22.13B – $22.27B

Roughly in-line

Adj EPS

$2.44

~$2.39 – $2.40

Beat

AI Revenue

$10.8B

$10.7B guide

Beat

Q3 Revenue Guide

$29.4B

~$28.3B

Beat

Q3 AI Revenue Guide

$16.0B

~$16.36B

Miss vs whisper expectations

The weak spot was Q3 AI revenue guidance. Broadcom guided for around $16 billion, while some expectations were closer to $16.36 billion. 

That is not a huge miss on paper, but when AI stocks have been trading like every report needs to be a blowout, even a small disappointment can matter.

Broadcom’s selloff was less about weak earnings and more about stretched expectations. Investors still appear to like the AI story, but they are becoming harder to impress.

Broadcom is a warning chart, not a broken chart

Broadcom is trading near a possible bearish reversal zone, but there is no confirmation yet.

Price is near the top of its rising weekly channel, while RSI is showing bearish divergence. That suggests momentum is not fully confirming the new high.

The chart remains structurally bullish for now. There has been no major bearish volume spike or large weekly rejection candle yet. The 50-week EMA band remains the key long-term support zone.

Chart

The AI trade is splitting

Broadcom sits on the AI seller side, alongside names like Nvidia, TSMC, Micron, Marvell and AMD. These are the companies selling the chips, networking, memory and infrastructure needed for AI buildout.

So far, the broader seller side is not breaking. Micron, TSMC, Marvell, AMD, SMH and SOXX continue to trade near highs, while only Nvidia and Broadcom are showing signs of cooling.

That makes Broadcom’s reaction look more stock-specific than sector-wide, at least for now.

Chart

The bigger weakness is showing up on the buyer side.

Meta is largely moving sideways, while Alphabet and Amazon are already rolling over from their May highs. The weakness is not broad enough to call a trend reversal yet, but momentum has clearly slowed among some of the largest AI spenders.

These are the companies spending heavily on AI infrastructure, cloud capacity, models and data centres. Investors are now asking whether that spending can turn into enough revenue to justify the valuation.

Chart

The market is not abandoning AI. It is becoming more selective about who actually benefits from it.

MAGS technical analysis

The weakness in Alphabet and Amazon also helps explain why MAGS is testing a key support level. As an ETF heavily weighted toward the largest AI spenders, MAGS may provide a cleaner read on investor sentiment toward AI monetisation than any individual stock.

MAGS is testing the neckline of a potential double top near 68.

A decisive break below 68 would confirm the pattern and bring the 65 zone into focus as the next downside target.

For now, the pattern is still unconfirmed. MAGS is still supported by its 50-day EMA band, which has acted as a useful support and resistance cloud in the past.

The recent volume spike into the neckline also raises the risk of a fakeout.

A fakeout would not automatically mean new highs are next. It could instead turn into a slower rounding top or inverse cup-and-handle style structure. For now, MAGS is cooling, but not broken.

Chart

S&P 500 technical analysis

The AI split is happening while the broader S&P 500 looks extended.

According to BTIG Chief Market Technician Jonathan Krinsky’s research, the S5INFT signal has only triggered 10 times between 1995 and 2024. The signal tracks moments when the S&P 500 becomes heavily stretched, with RSI above 78 and price trading more than 25% above its 200-day moving average.

Historical S&P 500 Returns After Extreme S5INFT Extension

Forward Return

Average Outcome

5 Days

-1.18%

10 Days

-1.54%

20 Days

-1.04%

30 Days

-1.54%

40 Days

0.32%

Signal conditions

  • Average RSI: 79.14.
  • Average spread above 200 DMA: 31.58%.

Historically, this type of extension has often led to weaker returns over the following month. It does not always mark a major top, but it does suggest higher pullback or consolidation risk.

This fits the current S&P 500 setup. After a nine-week rally and a move beyond Tom Lee’s 7,300 target, the index is now trading closer to Fibonacci extension territory.

The 50.0% extension sits near 7,395, while the next major upside reference is the 61.8% extension near 7,650.

SP

Price is still inside the current rising channel, so this is not a confirmed channel breakdown yet. However, if the S&P 500 closes around current levels, it would suggest a potential loss of the channel midpoint.

That would be an early bearish warning and could bring the 7,300 area back into focus. A deeper correction could expose the psychological 7,000 level.

Chart

Bottom line

For traders, the key question is not whether AI is dead. It is whether the market is becoming more selective.

Broadcom’s reaction suggests strong AI results may no longer be enough if guidance does not clear aggressive expectations.

MAGS now becomes the cleaner confirmation chart. If the 68 neckline holds, this may remain a controlled pullback inside a broader uptrend.

If it breaks cleanly, the AI buyer fatigue story becomes harder to ignore.

Author

Zorrays Junaid

Zorrays Junaid

Alchemy Markets

Zorrays Junaid has extensive combined experience in the financial markets as a portfolio manager and trading coach. More recently, he is an Analyst with Alchemy Markets, and has contributed to DailyFX and Elliott Wave Forecast in the past.

More from Zorrays Junaid
Share:

Editor's Picks

AUD/USD remains depressed near 0.6950 after RBA minutes

AUD/USD attracts follow-through selling during Tuesday’s Asian session, looking to extend the overnight rejection slide from 0.7000, or a two-week top, following the release of RBA meeting Minutes. The US Dollar retains a bullish undertone near its highest level since April 2025 as energy-driven inflation risks keep December Fed rate hike bets firmly on the table. Adding to this, geopolitical risks further underpin the safe-haven USD.

USD/JPY extends retreat below 158.50 as intervention risks loom

USD/JPY is dropping below 158.50 in the Asian session on Tuesday, snapping a two-day winning streak and pulling back from an over two-week top touched the previous day, despite Japan's soft PPI inflation print. Bulls turn cautious amid speculation that authorities will step in to prop up the Japanese Yen, which, in turn, weighs on the pair.

Gold clings to gains just below $4,200

Gold fades Monday’s small pullback and picks up renewed pace, briefly flirting with the key $4,200 mark per troy ounce. The precious metal’s recovery comes in line with the fresh downward trend in the Greenback in combination with shrinking US Treasury yields across the board and easing tensions on the geopolitical front.

Bitcoin rebounds despite cautious sentiment

Bitcoin rebounds over 2%, trading above $83,500 on Tuesday, recovering the previous day’s losses. Persistent geopolitical tensions and mixed signals continue to weigh on risk appetite, keeping investors cautious despite BTC’s recovery.

US – Midterm update: Democratic lead holds three weeks before election

With three weeks until the US midterm election on 3 November, prediction markets are more or less unchanged. Polymarket continues to put the probability of a Democratic sweep at 60-65%. The House is seen as a fairly safe Democratic win, with a probability of around 90%.

Has Bitcoin really escaped the macro forces it was built to fight?
Over 17 years ago, Satoshi Nakamoto designed Bitcoin (BTC) on the back of a global financial crisis as an alternative to the global monetary system outside the control of central banks, governments and traditional intermediaries. This raises a key question: has Bitcoin really become independent of the macroeconomic forces it was built to challenge?