|

Australian Dollar consolidates gains as dwindling Fed hiking hopes hurt the US Dollar

  • AUD/USD consolidates gains at 0.7000 after rallying 1.25% over the last two days.
  • Dollar weakness following soft US inflation figures is underpinning the Aussie's rally.
  • The decline in Australian Consumer Inflation Expectations has failed to dent the Australian Dollar's bullish trend.

The Australian Dollar (AUD) trades practically flat against a weaker US Dollar (USD) on Thursday as investors pare back bets of immediate Fed tightening, following unexpectedly soft US inflation figures earlier in the week. The AUD/USD pair consolidates at 0.7000 at the time of writing, after rallying about 1.25% earlier this week.

US Producer Prices Index (PPI) data released on Wednesday showed that factory inflation contracted 0.3% in June, down from a 0.6% increase in May and below expectations of a 0% reading. The year-on-year PPI eased to 5.5% from 6% in the previous month, below the market consensus of 6.2%.

PPI data follows another contraction in the Consumer Price Index (CPI), which posted its largest monthly drop in nearly six years in June. Likewise, the yearly CPI slowed down to its lowest rate since March, at the beginning of the US-Iran war, and 

These figures hint at a soft Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) Price Index report and have prompted investors to effectively rule out a Federal Reserve (Fed) rate hike in July and to cut back hopes of monetary tightening in September, sending the US Dollar lower across the board.
The Aussie Dollar, on the other hand, has remained resilient to the decline in Consumer Inflation Expectations, which fell to 4.7% in July, its lowest rate since January, from 5.5% in June. These figures have failed to clear the outlook for the Reserve Bank of Australia’s monetary policy, but they did not dent the Aussie's bullish trend either.

Inflation FAQs

Inflation measures the rise in the price of a representative basket of goods and services. Headline inflation is usually expressed as a percentage change on a month-on-month (MoM) and year-on-year (YoY) basis. Core inflation excludes more volatile elements such as food and fuel which can fluctuate because of geopolitical and seasonal factors. Core inflation is the figure economists focus on and is the level targeted by central banks, which are mandated to keep inflation at a manageable level, usually around 2%.

The Consumer Price Index (CPI) measures the change in prices of a basket of goods and services over a period of time. It is usually expressed as a percentage change on a month-on-month (MoM) and year-on-year (YoY) basis. Core CPI is the figure targeted by central banks as it excludes volatile food and fuel inputs. When Core CPI rises above 2% it usually results in higher interest rates and vice versa when it falls below 2%. Since higher interest rates are positive for a currency, higher inflation usually results in a stronger currency. The opposite is true when inflation falls.

Although it may seem counter-intuitive, high inflation in a country pushes up the value of its currency and vice versa for lower inflation. This is because the central bank will normally raise interest rates to combat the higher inflation, which attract more global capital inflows from investors looking for a lucrative place to park their money.

Formerly, Gold was the asset investors turned to in times of high inflation because it preserved its value, and whilst investors will often still buy Gold for its safe-haven properties in times of extreme market turmoil, this is not the case most of the time. This is because when inflation is high, central banks will put up interest rates to combat it. Higher interest rates are negative for Gold because they increase the opportunity-cost of holding Gold vis-a-vis an interest-bearing asset or placing the money in a cash deposit account. On the flipside, lower inflation tends to be positive for Gold as it brings interest rates down, making the bright metal a more viable investment alternative.

Author

Guillermo Alcala

Graduated in Communication Sciences at the Universidad del Pais Vasco and Universiteit van Amsterdam, Guillermo has been working as financial news editor and copywriter in diverse Forex-related firms, like FXStreet and Kantox.

More from Guillermo Alcala
Share:

Editor's Picks

GBP/USD remains offered near 1.3450

GBP/USD gives away its initial advance, trading with decent losses in the mid-1.3400s on Thursday. Conflicting signals around the Middle East continue to weigh on sentiment, prompting Cable to fade two daily advances in a row.

EUR/USD drops to two-day lows; focus is back to 1.1500

EUR/USD’s daily decline picks up pace and approaches the 1.1500 neighbourhood following the closing bell in Euroland on Thursday. The pair’s pullback comes in response to the firmer tone in the US Dollar in a context of reignited concerns over the Strait of Hormuz.

How Wall Street rigs the game [Video]

In this week’s Live from the Vault, Andrew Maguire is joined by Peter Antico and Sean Stone to discuss the Paradigm of Money - an in-depth expose of financial market corruption, from naked shorting to the two-tier system that protects Wall Street.

XRP Price Forecast: Sell-off persists, bears aim for $1.00 as Ripple eyes on-chain multi-signature upgrade
Ripple (XRP) remains pressured, trading below $1.05 at the time of writing on Thursday. The token has declined for the fourth consecutive day this week, reflecting lethargic sentiment in the broader cryptocurrency market despite the possibility of easing geopolitical tensions in the Middle East.
The Fed is doing the exact opposite of what it should be doing
About the Yen: The WSJ has a front-page story about how the Fed is doing the exact opposite of what it should be doing—lending dollars to Japan to buy yen. “Put simply: America is printing dollars so Japan can buy yen.
9-3: Is the Federal Reserve’s vote tally Warsh's new forward guidance?
The rate did not move. Neither did the statement, and that’s the more interesting fact. Set the July 29 Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) statement beside the one issued on June 17, and the two documents are identical apart from a single verb and a paragraph at the bottom naming three dissenters.