|

USD: Supply shock risks and capital flows – BNY

BNY's Geoff Yu notes that despite major supply shocks in 2022–2023, private capital flows into United States (US) assets, including Treasuries and equities, remained resilient even as APAC (Asia-Pacific) and European trade surpluses declined. The report argues that the US Dollar (USD) could come under pressure only if semiconductor-related supply constraints curb private inflows, with limited offset from official flows while global trade surpluses stay subdued.

Private inflows still support Dollar

"During rounds of immediate risk-off from a supply shock, reserve managers’ aggressive FX sales may support the dollar due to currency rebalancing. But as dollar-denominated assets such as U.S. Treasurys face swift liquidation, there could be a direct adverse effect on U.S. asset prices. Additional factors – such as tighter financial conditions from higher yields – will also pressure U.S. equity markets, and a prolonged decline in surpluses normally recycled back into the U.S. would compound that challenge."

"While liquidity stress was pronounced during the most extreme weeks of the pandemic, based on Treasury International Capital figures, the U.S. did not face massive liquidation flow in 2022. Returns in 2021 were weaker, perhaps because the world was reopening – making risk-reward attractive for portfolio accounts in markets and asset classes seen as benefiting from reopening “earlier” than the U.S. Private flows were consistently strong into the U.S. from 2021 onwards, and the 2022 supply shock – when APAC and European surpluses declined – did not impact capital recycling into the U.S. from external savings."

"In hindsight, while the quantum of global surpluses remained high, they simply shifted from APAC/Europe to petro-producers – yet flows ended up in the U.S. either way, as its asset markets continued to offer the strongest performance."

"However, one constraint could derail the base case of tech/AI-led U.S. outperformance case – an acute shortage of specific goods required for semiconductor production, driven by supply-chain and logistics disruptions. If realized, the dollar could face significant pressure as private capital inflows ease, with no offsetting official flows while trade surpluses remain subdued."

(This article was created with the help of an Artificial Intelligence tool and reviewed by an editor.)

Author

FXStreet Insights Team

The FXStreet Insights Team is a group of journalists that handpicks selected market observations published by renowned experts. The content includes notes by commercial as well as additional insights by internal and external analysts.

More from FXStreet Insights Team
Share:

Editor's Picks

GBP/USD: Downward-sloping trendline near 1.3470 remains key barrier

The British pound faces selling pressure against its major currency peers, trading 0.1% lower at around 1.3420 against the US Dollar during the European trading session on Tuesday.

Euro clings to the bid bias above 1.1500

EUR/USD has picked up pace, reversing Monday’s decline and advancing past the 1.1500 barrier on Tuesday. In the meantime, hopes for a diplomatic solution to the Middle East crisis keep the US Dollar under modest downside pressure, helping spot in its recovery.

Ethereum holds steady below $1,900 as retail distribution rises
Ethereum (ETH) continued trading flat on Tuesday following modestly increasing exchange net flows and continued distribution across retail wallets. Ethereum on-chain data shows mixed sentiment across several wallet cohorts.
RBI set to keep interest rates unchanged as inflation risks persist

The Reserve Bank of India is set to announce its bi-monthly monetary policy decision on Wednesday at 10:00 AM IST (04:30 GMT), another meeting coming at a time when uncertainty remains high over the duration and economic fallout of the ongoing Middle East conflict.

9-3: Is the Federal Reserve’s vote tally Warsh's new forward guidance?
The rate did not move. Neither did the statement, and that’s the more interesting fact. Set the July 29 Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) statement beside the one issued on June 17, and the two documents are identical apart from a single verb and a paragraph at the bottom naming three dissenters.