|

USD/INR: Regulatory squeeze supports Rupee – MUFG

MUFG’s Senior Currency Analyst Michael Wan analyzes new RBI measures restricting Indian Rupee non-deliverable derivatives and recent limits on onshore USD/INR positions. He argues these steps deepen the divide between onshore and offshore markets and aim to curb INR weakness. Despite near-term Rupee support, MUFG still expects structural INR depreciation and sees higher USD/INR levels as likely over time.

RBI clamps down on INR NDF access

"RBI announced new regulations on the Indian Rupee late Wednesday (1 April). In particular, authorised dealers are now prohibited from offering non-deliverable derivative contracts using the Indian Rupee to resident or non-resident users, and this change is effective immediately."

"By closing this channel for non-banks to potentially engage directly in INR NDF markets, RBI is effectively increasing the bifurcation between onshore and offshore, and with the objective to reduce the spillovers from INR NDF markets to onshore currency weakness."

"The near-term market implications of these regulatory changes are as follows, and overall seems to be generally playing out at the time of our writing: Higher NDF forward points/implied yields, wider NDF spreads versus onshore forwards, and steeper FX forward curves Lower USD/INR forward outright in the NDF market Bigger move lower in USD/INR onshore (ie. stronger INR)."

"Overall, we think the fundamental flow picture for INR still points towards FX weakness moving forward. As such once the dust on these regulations settle, we think it is still a good chance for clients to buy USD/INR if lower levels in the markets allow moving forward."

"If oil prices continue rising in an adverse scenario, we think that USD/INR at 97.50 and even higher could be possible."

(This article was created with the help of an Artificial Intelligence tool and reviewed by an editor.)

Author

FXStreet Insights Team

The FXStreet Insights Team is a group of journalists that handpicks selected market observations published by renowned experts. The content includes notes by commercial as well as additional insights by internal and external analysts.

More from FXStreet Insights Team
Share:

Editor's Picks

GBP/USD flirts with tops near 1.3470

GBP/USD manages to regain composure and challenge the area of daily highs around 1.3470 on Friday. Cable picks up pace despite marginal gains in the Greenback in a context of swelling geopolitical tensions and rising global oil prices.

EUR/USD trims losses, back above 1.1500

EUR/USD picks up some pace and bouces off earlier lows, reclaiming the 1.1500 threshold and beyond at the end of the week. The pair’s modest pullback follows a persistent risk-averse market mood and renewed buying interest for the US Dollar.

Gold: The $4,000 mark holds the downside for now

Gold faces renewed selling pressure, falling sharply toweard the $4,000 mark per troy ounce as the US Dollar regains momentum. Escalating US-Iran tensions are keeping inflation concerns and expectations of further Fed rate hikes alive, weighing further on the yellow metal.

Bitcoin eyes 50-day EMA breakout, Ethereum consolidates, XRP steadies

Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Ripple trade near key technical levels on Friday as the broader cryptocurrency market pauses following last week's recovery. BTC is approaching the 50-day Exponential Moving Average while ETH continues to consolidate between two major EMAs.

Warsh needs to restore his reputation
We were glad to see our deeply negative reaction to the Warsh press conference was not some personal peculiarity. Just about everybody in the financial press felt the same way. The consensus is building it’s not the Fed in the dog-house but only Warsh. Today the WSJ changed it tune and blasted Warsh—"the honeymoon is already over..”
9-3: Is the Federal Reserve’s vote tally Warsh's new forward guidance?
The rate did not move. Neither did the statement, and that’s the more interesting fact. Set the July 29 Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) statement beside the one issued on June 17, and the two documents are identical apart from a single verb and a paragraph at the bottom naming three dissenters.