|

United Kingdom: Confidence may unlock household spending – Rabobank

Rabobank’s Stefan Koopman analyses United Kingdom demand prospects under Prime Minister Burnham’s shift from “securonomics” to “vibonomics”. The report argues that elevated household saving and weak confidence leave scope for a temporary consumption boost if sentiment improves. However, it stresses that lasting growth in the UK will depend on structural reforms to productivity, investment, housing, energy and real wages.

Confidence, savings and UK demand

"The upside is that it all leaves a buffer that stronger confidence could partly unlock. In hindsight it poses an awkward question for Starmer and Reeves. By repeatedly stressing security, discipline and repair, did they inadvertently reinforce the sense that households needed to remain defensive?"

"Looking ahead, we expect the saving ratio to remain at around current levels, averaging 9.4% over the next two years, as we expect continued cautiousness amidst structural uncertainty, with interest rates remaining at elevated levels. This means that we expect the build-up of yet another £150 billion in savings."

"We estimate that every one percentage point decline in the household saving ratio is equivalent to roughly 0.5% of GDP in additional demand once import leakages are taken into account. A sustained fall of around three percentage points, bringing the saving ratio back towards its pre-pandemic average, could therefore raise the level of GDP by about 1.5%. Spread over the period to the 2029 election, that could make a 1.0% growth economy temporarily look more like a 1.5% economy."

"Burnham can probably improve the mood and may even buy himself a few stronger quarters. But he cannot vibe the UK out of its consumption slump. For that, the autumn reform agenda will need to tackle the structural constraints holding back both supply and living standards."

(This article was created with the help of an Artificial Intelligence tool and reviewed by an editor. Know more.)

Author

FXStreet Insights Team

The FXStreet Insights Team is a group of journalists that handpicks selected market observations published by renowned experts. The content includes notes by commercial as well as additional insights by internal and external analysts.

More from FXStreet Insights Team
Share:

Editor's Picks

GBP/USD keeps the bull run intact, still below 1.3500

GBP/USD manages to trade with acceptable gains around 1.3480 on Thursday. Conflicting signals from US and Iranian officials over a potential deal have kept markets cautious and capped Cable’s upside, while investors avoid taking sizeable positions ahead of Friday’s crucial US NFP report.

EUR/USD faces some downside pressure around 1.1540

EUR/USD retreats modestly after advancing for two consecutive days, slipping below 1.1550 on Thursday. In the meantime, markets remain cautious over the prospects of a US-Iran peace agreement and the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz, keeping demand for the safe-haven US Dollar intact and preventing spot from regaining momentum.

How Wall Street rigs the game [Video]

In this week’s Live from the Vault, Andrew Maguire is joined by Peter Antico and Sean Stone to discuss the Paradigm of Money - an in-depth expose of financial market corruption, from naked shorting to the two-tier system that protects Wall Street.

XRP Price Forecast: Sell-off persists, bears aim for $1.00 as Ripple eyes on-chain multi-signature upgrade
Ripple (XRP) remains pressured, trading below $1.05 at the time of writing on Thursday. The token has declined for the fourth consecutive day this week, reflecting lethargic sentiment in the broader cryptocurrency market despite the possibility of easing geopolitical tensions in the Middle East.
The Fed is doing the exact opposite of what it should be doing
About the Yen: The WSJ has a front-page story about how the Fed is doing the exact opposite of what it should be doing—lending dollars to Japan to buy yen. “Put simply: America is printing dollars so Japan can buy yen.
9-3: Is the Federal Reserve’s vote tally Warsh's new forward guidance?
The rate did not move. Neither did the statement, and that’s the more interesting fact. Set the July 29 Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) statement beside the one issued on June 17, and the two documents are identical apart from a single verb and a paragraph at the bottom naming three dissenters.