|

Singapore: Limited growth hit from conflict – UOB

UOB Global Economics & Markets Research, through Associate Economist Jester Koh, judges that Singapore’s GDP exposure to the Middle East conflict is modest under a short-lived shock scenario. Exports to key regional economies are about 2% of total exports, and UOB keeps its 2026 GDP growth forecast at 3.6%, while flagging potential secondary demand effects via weaker global consumption and investment.

Growth impact seen as contained for now

"We assess the direct impact on Singapore’s GDP growth from the latest escalation in the Middle East conflict to be limited at this juncture, assuming the conflict stays heightened only for a short period (within four weeks) and the associated oil price shock is transient (remaining below US$100/bbl and normalizing gradually thereafter)."

"Secondary effects on growth, though difficult to quantify, could emerge through the associated drag on consumption and investment activity in Singapore’s key trading partners."

"External demand may be dampened by weaker sentiment and supply‑chain disruptions, which in turn would weigh on Singapore’s exports. This poses a drag on Singapore’s growth, compounded by the economy’s high degree of openness, with a significant share of domestic value‑added (DVA) supported by foreign demand."

"In addition, spillover effects from higher utility, transport and input costs on both goods and services inflation could be meaningful. Using data from 2005–2025, our regression results suggest that a US$10/bbl increase in Brent crude oil prices from baseline could raise core inflation by around 30–40bps."

"On balance, this implies, ceteris paribus, a higher likelihood that MAS will tighten policy at the Apr 2026 MPS (our base case) by raising the S$NEER band slope by 50bps to 1.0% p.a., although there remains a possibility that policy normalisation could be delayed to the Jul 2026 MPS."

"We assess that the macro impact of the ongoing Middle East conflict is likely to be more prominent on inflation than on growth, at least in the near term."

(This article was created with the help of an Artificial Intelligence tool and reviewed by an editor.)

Author

FXStreet Insights Team

The FXStreet Insights Team is a group of journalists that handpicks selected market observations published by renowned experts. The content includes notes by commercial as well as additional insights by internal and external analysts.

More from FXStreet Insights Team
Share:

Editor's Picks

GBP/USD hovers around 1.3450 amid upbeat mood, ahead of ADP

GBP/USD is inching higher above 1.3450 in European trading on Wednesday, helped by reduced haven appeal for the US Dollar as markets cheer a potential US-Iran deal on the Strait of Hormuz reopening. The decision is due later in the day. Traders also look forward to the US ADP and ISM Services PMI data.

EUR/USD keeps range near 1.1550 on Hormuz reopening optimism

EUR/USD holds ground near 1.1550 in the early European hours on Wednesday. The pair stays supported amid hopes for a US-Iran deal on the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz, which lifts risk sentiment and keeps the safe-haven US Dollar on the back foot. The US ADP Employment data and ISM Services PMI report are in the spotlight alongside Mideast headlines.

USD/INR: Indian Rupee sits at monthly highs above 95.00 after RBI's neutral hold

Indian Rupee is hanging close to its highest level in a month just above the 95.00 level against the US Dollar on Wednesday, holding gains after the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) held the Repo Rate at 5.25%, as expected, maintaining a neutral stance amid still-modest inflation.

Top 3 Price Predictions: Bitcoin, Ethereum, Ripple – BTC eyes breakout, ETH consolidates, XRP finds stability

Bitcoin, Ethereum and Ripple move toward the key technical levels on Wednesday, which could determine the next directional bias. BTC is near the 50-day Exponential Moving Average, ETH trades sideways while XRP is showing signs of stabilization.

9-3: Is the Federal Reserve’s vote tally Warsh's new forward guidance?
The rate did not move. Neither did the statement, and that’s the more interesting fact. Set the July 29 Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) statement beside the one issued on June 17, and the two documents are identical apart from a single verb and a paragraph at the bottom naming three dissenters.