PBOC leaves Loan Prime Rates unchanged in March

Lallalit Srijandorn FXStreet

The People’s Bank of China (PBOC), China's central bank, announced to leave its Loan Prime Rates (LPRs) unchanged on Friday. The one-year and five-year LPRs were at 3.00% and 3.50%, respectively.

Market reaction to the PBoC interest rate decision

At the time of writing, the AUD/USD is trading 0.08% lower on the day to trade at 0.7081.

PBOC FAQs

What does the People's Bank of China do?

The primary monetary policy objectives of the People's Bank of China (PBoC) are to safeguard price stability, including exchange rate stability, and promote economic growth. China’s central bank also aims to implement financial reforms, such as opening and developing the financial market.

Who owns the PBoC?

The PBoC is owned by the state of the People's Republic of China (PRC), so it is not considered an autonomous institution. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Committee Secretary, nominated by the Chairman of the State Council, has a key influence on the PBoC’s management and direction, not the governor. However, Mr. Pan Gongsheng currently holds both of these posts.

What are the main policy tools used by the PBoC?

Unlike the Western economies, the PBoC uses a broader set of monetary policy instruments to achieve its objectives. The primary tools include a seven-day Reverse Repo Rate (RRR), Medium-term Lending Facility (MLF), foreign exchange interventions and Reserve Requirement Ratio (RRR). However, The Loan Prime Rate (LPR) is China’s benchmark interest rate. Changes to the LPR directly influence the rates that need to be paid in the market for loans and mortgages and the interest paid on savings. By changing the LPR, China’s central bank can also influence the exchange rates of the Chinese Renminbi.

Are private banks allowed in China?

Yes, China has 19 private banks – a small fraction of the financial system. The largest private banks are digital lenders WeBank and MYbank, which are backed by tech giants Tencent and Ant Group, per The Straits Times. In 2014, China allowed domestic lenders fully capitalized by private funds to operate in the state-dominated financial sector.

Author

Lallalit Srijandorn

FXStreet

Lallalit Srijandorn is a Parisian at heart. She has lived in France since 2019 and now becomes a digital entrepreneur based in Paris and Bangkok.

GBP/USD weakens despite easing safe-haven demand

GBP/USD edges lower after registering modest gains in the previous day, trading around 1.3450 during the Asian hours. The currency pair came under selling pressure as the US Dollar gained momentum, bolstered by a rebound in the benchmark 10-year US Treasury yield, which had dipped toward 4.61% on Tuesday. That initial slide in yields was driven by falling energy prices, which helped cool inflation fears and tempered expectations of a hawkish response from the Federal Reserve.

Euro edges lower below 1.1550 on Hormuz uncertainty

The EUR/USD pair trades with mild losses near 1.1530 during the Asian trading hours. Uncertainty surrounding US-Iran talks weighs on riskier assets such as the Euro against the US Dollar. The US ADP Employment data and ISM Services Purchasing Managers Index report are due later on Wednesday. All eyes will be on the US July jobs release on Friday.

USD/INR: Indian Rupee sits at monthly highs above 95.00 after RBI's neutral hold

Indian Rupee is hanging close to its highest level in a month just above the 95.00 level against the US Dollar on Wednesday, holding gains after the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) held the Repo Rate at 5.25%, as expected, maintaining a neutral stance amid still-modest inflation.

Top 3 Price Predictions: Bitcoin, Ethereum, Ripple – BTC eyes breakout, ETH consolidates, XRP finds stability

Bitcoin, Ethereum and Ripple move toward the key technical levels on Wednesday, which could determine the next directional bias. BTC is near the 50-day Exponential Moving Average, ETH trades sideways while XRP is showing signs of stabilization.

9-3: Is the Federal Reserve’s vote tally Warsh's new forward guidance?

The rate did not move. Neither did the statement, and that’s the more interesting fact. Set the July 29 Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) statement beside the one issued on June 17, and the two documents are identical apart from a single verb and a paragraph at the bottom naming three dissenters.