|

NVDA: The chart setup hiding behind the bond-sale headlines

The setup nobody’s watching while everyone argues about the bond sale

The noise around Nvidia this week is the $25 billion bond offering and another round of “is the AI trade overheating” think pieces. The chart is telling a quieter, more useful story. After the early-June chip-sector flush dragged NVDA from its highs near $236 down toward the $200 region, price has spent the last two weeks doing something specific: it stopped falling exactly where it was supposed to.

That “where it was supposed to” is the whole point of today’s chart.

Two levels did the work

Chart

The bounce off the recent lows lines up with a pair of references that traders watch closely. The first is the 50% Fibonacci retracement of the entire March-to-May advance, the rally that ran from the $164 base up to the $236 peak. The midpoint of a move is where buyers and sellers often re-test conviction, and price found a floor right in that zone before turning back up.

The second is the anchored VWAP measured from the March lows. That line tracks the average price paid by everyone who bought into this leg higher, and it has flattened out and acted as support right where price stabilised. When a 50% retracement and a major VWAP sit on top of each other, you get confluence, and confluence is what turns a random bounce into a level worth respecting.

The shape that’s forming

Zoom into the recent action and the structure resembles a bull flag. The sharp run into the highs was the pole, and the gentle, downward-drifting consolidation since then is the flag, drawn here by the two descending blue trendlines. Bull flags are continuation patterns, meaning they typically resolve in the direction of the move that preceded them. Price is currently pressing against the upper boundary of that flag near the 38.2% retracement, with the pre-market print around $207 to $208.

What actually powers the next leg

A flag is just a pattern until something fundamental pushes price through it. For Nvidia, that something has a name: hyperscaler capex. The chart below is the spending pipeline that Nvidia is ultimately priced on.

Chart

The four largest cloud builders, Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon and Meta, are lifting combined capital spending from roughly $410 billion in 2025 to about $725 billion this year, with Wall Street consensus now placing 2027 above $1 trillion. The bulk of that money flows into AI data centres, and the single biggest beneficiary of that build is Nvidia’s data-center segment, the mint line riding on top of the bars. Put simply, the bars are the order book and the line is the revenue it produces. As long as that pipeline keeps expanding, the technical dips have a fundamental floor underneath them.

What turns this from idea into trade

The pattern is not confirmed yet. A bull flag only counts once price breaks and holds above the upper trendline of the flag, ideally on a pickup in volume. Until that happens, this is a stock balancing on support rather than launching off it.

The two things to watch are simple. On the upside, a clean break above the flag’s upper edge and the 38.2% level opens the path back toward the recent swing highs and the gap up to the 23.6% zone. On the downside, a decisive close back below the anchored VWAP and the 50% retracement would invalidate the bounce and put the lower $200s, then the $196 region, back in play.

For now, the bulls have the better argument. Confluence support is holding, the consolidation is tightening, and the spending backdrop that feeds Nvidia’s largest segment is still climbing. The chart has done its part. The market just needs to confirm it.

Author

Zorrays Junaid

Zorrays Junaid

Alchemy Markets

Zorrays Junaid has extensive combined experience in the financial markets as a portfolio manager and trading coach. More recently, he is an Analyst with Alchemy Markets, and has contributed to DailyFX and Elliott Wave Forecast in the past.

More from Zorrays Junaid
Share:

Editor's Picks

AUD/USD holds firm near 0.7000 after Chinese inflation, trade data

AUD/USD stays firm near 0.7000 in Wednesday’s Asian session, picking up some bids after China's mixed inflation and upbeat trade data. CPI rose less than expected in September, while PPI inflation picked up. Meanwhile, the Chinese trade surplus unexpectedly widened in September. The pair remains underpinned by a broadly subdued US Dollar, despite the Middle East escalation, as focus remains on US CPI data.

USD/JPY consolidates near 158.50; looks to US CPI for fresh impetus

USD/JPY stays range-bound near 158.50 in the Asian session on Wednesday, with looming intervention risks supporting the Japanese Yen and capping upside amid a softer US Dollar. However, geopolitical uncertainties act as a tailwind for the safe-haven USD and the pair. Traders also seem hesitant ahead of the release of the latest US inflation figures.

Gold remains offered below $4,100

Gold adds to the weekly bearish tone and slips back below the $4,100 mark per troy ounce on Wednesday. Indeed, the precious metal continues to suffer the stronger US Dollar and rising US Treasury yields as bets for extra tightening by the Fed remain on the rise following US inflation figures.

XRP recovery faces headwinds despite Ripple and Meritz Securities' tokenization push in Korea

XRP trades above $1.36 as bulls gather momentum to face a critical supply range toward $1.40. Ripple and Meritz Securities partner to explore institutional custody and tokenization services for South Korea’s capital markets.

China's rare earth leverage has an expiration date: November 10. Here's what Beijing is deciding
China is approaching a major strategic deadline in its trade confrontation with the United States (US). On November 10, the suspension of additional rare earth export restrictions Beijing announced in October 2025 is set to expire.
Has Bitcoin really escaped the macro forces it was built to fight?
Over 17 years ago, Satoshi Nakamoto designed Bitcoin (BTC) on the back of a global financial crisis as an alternative to the global monetary system outside the control of central banks, governments and traditional intermediaries. This raises a key question: has Bitcoin really become independent of the macroeconomic forces it was built to challenge?