|

Fed: Energy shock risks shift rate debate – Nordea

Nordea strategists Ole Håkon Eek-Nielsen and Jan von Gerich argue the Federal Reserve is unlikely to cut rates and could even face pressure to hike as a potential energy shock lifts inflation risks. They compare current conditions with the 1970s, highlight stagflation dangers, and see investors demanding higher yields, especially at the long end of the US bond curve.

Energy shock complicates Fed policy outlook

"We have for quite a while been arguing for no more cuts from the Fed. Seems like we could be right for the wrong reasons. Even if we still struggle to see much weakness in the US labour market, it is the potential energy crisis that is the most important driver right now."

"This situation could be challenging for today’s version of Fed; balancing higher unemployment with higher inflation is never easy. The cuts that Warsh has promised to deliver will probably be even harder. The lessons learned in the seventies will probably make quite a few FOMC-members argue for hikes, but given the potential for higher unemployment some might also draw the same conclusion as many did back then and try to induce as little pain as possible."

"In the seventies core inflation topped out above 13% and interest rates peaked at 17%. Neither we nor the market is implying such an outcome, but the risk of such an extreme is now higher than before and perhaps the probability should be seen as higher than what the market is pricing in."

"The stagflationary impulse this potentially is could also be met by stimulus from the government to ease the pain inflicted on consumers. The downturn it produces is likely to increase the, already too high, budget deficits in the US. It seems likely that bond investors will demand higher interest rates to meet record high supply and increasing inflation."

"We already see quite some pressure from the supply side in the bond markets and have for quite a while been arguing for the upside in long end bond yields."

(This article was created with the help of an Artificial Intelligence tool and reviewed by an editor.)

Author

FXStreet Insights Team

The FXStreet Insights Team is a group of journalists that handpicks selected market observations published by renowned experts. The content includes notes by commercial as well as additional insights by internal and external analysts.

More from FXStreet Insights Team
Share:

Editor's Picks

Japanese Yen gains ground as traders await Fed rate decision

The USD/JPY pair loses ground to near 160.25 during the early European trading hours. Traders prefer to wait on the sidelines ahead of the US Federal Reserve interest rate decision under new Chair Kevin Warsh later on Wednesday.

AUD/USD puts 0.7000 to the test on solid Dollar

In line with the rest of its risk-linked peers, AUD/USD retreats markedly and challenges the key 0.7000 support ahead of the opening bell in Asia. The robust performance of the Greenback hurt the sentiment around the Aussie Dollar, dragging spot lower following the FOMC event.

Gold extends intraday slide towards $4,250

Gold turned negative by the end of Wednesday and trades in the $4,260 price zone. The US Federal Reserve left rates unchanged, but delivered a hawkish message, even though Chair Kevin Warsh refused to provide forward guidance.

Two altcoins to watch as DeFi market cap nears $70B
Decentralized Finance (DeFi) tokens exhibit mixed signals on Wednesday, with Uniswap (UNI) slightly pulling back from an early-week rally to highs around $3.73, while Aster (ASTER) extends its recovery near $0.80. Bitcoin (BTC) holds above $65,000 following a rejection at June highs around $67,000.
The next big AI trade may not be about chips or software
Artificial intelligence has already created some of the biggest winners in modern market history. Chipmakers have surged, data centre construction is booming, and electricity demand forecasts are changing globally.
Why a hawkish RBA is no longer enough to lift the Australian Dollar

The Reserve Bank of Australia delivered more than what markets expected: a hawkish hold that should have supported the Aussie. But markets widely ignored it, focusing instead on slowing economic growth and proving that central bank messaging alone isn’t always enough to drive currencies.