|

The Oil market is calm, but JPMorgan’s Hormuz math says the fuse is still burning

  • JPMorgan’s Natasha Kaneva is not saying the Hormuz shock has disappeared. The better read is that the market has found several expensive ways to absorb it, from clandestine flows and Atlantic Basin rerouting to SPR releases and deeper demand destruction.
  • The calm in the Brent market is therefore less a clean bill of health and more a measure of how much stress the system can carry before inventories become the price-setting variable. JPMorgan still sees stress levels arriving in late June and operational floor levels approaching by September if the disruption persists.
  • My trader view is that oil is still trading the difference between a managed shortage and an inventory event. As long as Hormuz reopens in June, Brent can remain anchored near $95-$100. If the closure extends beyond June, the market’s current serenity risks turning into a very different tape, where every additional month of disruption adds a progressively larger premium to the barrel.

The fuse is still burning

Drawing on JPMorgan commodity strategist Natasha Kaneva’s latest work, the oil market is doing something that feels almost unnatural given the backdrop. The conflict is entering its fourth month, the latest exchange of strikes between Iran and Israel suggests the war is restarting rather than resolving, and the Strait of Hormuz remains the central pressure valve in the global energy system. Yet prices have not behaved like a market staring into the mouth of a supply shock. Brent has stabilized near $100 per barrel, Dated Brent has eased materially, and the physical premium to front-month futures has collapsed from the panic-scramble record of $36 in early April to roughly $2, effectively back near pre-conflict levels. Refined products have also come off their highs, and volatility across both crude and product markets has deflated sharply.

Author

Stephen Innes

Stephen Innes

SPI Asset Management

With more than 25 years of experience, Stephen has a deep-seated knowledge of G10 and Asian currency markets as well as precious metal and oil markets.

More from Stephen Innes
Share:

Editor's Picks

GBP/USD clings to multi-day peaks below 1.3500

GBP/USD trades with marked gains on Friday, now giving away some gains following an earlier surpass of the key 1.3500 yardstick. Indeed, Cable gathers fresh steam amid the strong offered stance in the Greenback, all after US NFP badly missed expectations in July.

EUR/USD: Post-NFP bounce falters around 1.1580

EUR/USD reverses Thursday’s decline and trades with solid gains in the 1.1560 region, or two-month peaks, on Friday. The pair’s firm performance comes in a context of a sharp correction in the US Dollar as investors continue to assess disheartening US NFP readings.

How Wall Street rigs the game [Video]

In this week’s Live from the Vault, Andrew Maguire is joined by Peter Antico and Sean Stone to discuss the Paradigm of Money - an in-depth expose of financial market corruption, from naked shorting to the two-tier system that protects Wall Street.

XRP Price Forecast: XRP nears critical $1.00 support
Ripple (XRP) remains pressured on Friday, trading around $1.03 at the time of writing. The token appears to hold this current level as support but lacks a catalyst to sustain a knee-jerk rebound toward the next key resistance at $1.10.
Is Gold about to enter its biggest bull run since 2020?
Gold has stormed back into the spotlight and its next move could leave late buyers chasing. On August 5, the yellow metal surged almost 7% – roughly $174 – to close near $4,308 an ounce, posting one of its biggest daily advances in recent history. A weaker U.S dollar, falling Treasury yields, changing Federal Reserve expectations and renewed safe-haven demand all struck at once.
9-3: Is the Federal Reserve’s vote tally Warsh's new forward guidance?
The rate did not move. Neither did the statement, and that’s the more interesting fact. Set the July 29 Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) statement beside the one issued on June 17, and the two documents are identical apart from a single verb and a paragraph at the bottom naming three dissenters.