|

USD/CAD extends losses, nearing 1.3700 amid optimism about Iran's war

  • USD/CAD hits three-week lows at 1.3713 and is nealy 1% down on the week.
  • Rising hopes of a new round of US-Iran peace talks are weighing on the US Dollar.
  • A new rift between Trump and Fed Chairman Jerome Powell adds pressure on the Greenback.

The US Dollar (USD) extends losses against the Canadian Dollar (CAD) for the fourth consecutive day on Thursday, amid broad-based weakness in the USD as investors raise their bets on a resolution of the Middle East conflict. The pair has depreciated by nearly 1% so far this week, hitting fresh three-week lows at 1.3713 before recovering above 1.3720 at the time of writing.

US President Donald Trump boosted investors' optimism on Wednesday, affirming that the US and Iran are holding “productive and ongoing” discussions and showing confidence that the peace talks might resume in the coming days. This news has prompted investors to pare back their holdings of safe-haven US Dollars and move towards riskier assets.

Apart from that, the US president has reiterated his threat to oust Federal Reserve (Fed) Chair Jerome Powell if he refuses to leave the central bank at the end of his term in May. This brings back concerns about the central bank's independence and undermines confidence in the US Dollar as a reserve currency.

Powell’s term as Fed chief expires on May 15, but his tenure on the Board of Governors extends until January 2028, and he said that he will stay in charge until the criminal investigation for an alleged fraud ends. The investigation might delay the Senate’s confirmation of Powell’s successor, Kevin Warsh, for several weeks, allowing Powell to remain in charge.

Regarding macroeconomics, Canada’s calendar is light this week. In the US, the Philadelphia Fed Manufacturing Survey from April, Industrial Production data from March, and the speeches of the New York Fed President John Williams and Board member Stephen Miran are likely to provide additional guidance for US Dollar crosses later on Thursday.

Fed FAQs

Monetary policy in the US is shaped by the Federal Reserve (Fed). The Fed has two mandates: to achieve price stability and foster full employment. Its primary tool to achieve these goals is by adjusting interest rates. When prices are rising too quickly and inflation is above the Fed’s 2% target, it raises interest rates, increasing borrowing costs throughout the economy. This results in a stronger US Dollar (USD) as it makes the US a more attractive place for international investors to park their money. When inflation falls below 2% or the Unemployment Rate is too high, the Fed may lower interest rates to encourage borrowing, which weighs on the Greenback.

The Federal Reserve (Fed) holds eight policy meetings a year, where the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) assesses economic conditions and makes monetary policy decisions. The FOMC is attended by twelve Fed officials – the seven members of the Board of Governors, the president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, and four of the remaining eleven regional Reserve Bank presidents, who serve one-year terms on a rotating basis.

In extreme situations, the Federal Reserve may resort to a policy named Quantitative Easing (QE). QE is the process by which the Fed substantially increases the flow of credit in a stuck financial system. It is a non-standard policy measure used during crises or when inflation is extremely low. It was the Fed’s weapon of choice during the Great Financial Crisis in 2008. It involves the Fed printing more Dollars and using them to buy high grade bonds from financial institutions. QE usually weakens the US Dollar.

Quantitative tightening (QT) is the reverse process of QE, whereby the Federal Reserve stops buying bonds from financial institutions and does not reinvest the principal from the bonds it holds maturing, to purchase new bonds. It is usually positive for the value of the US Dollar.

Author

Guillermo Alcala

Graduated in Communication Sciences at the Universidad del Pais Vasco and Universiteit van Amsterdam, Guillermo has been working as financial news editor and copywriter in diverse Forex-related firms, like FXStreet and Kantox.

More from Guillermo Alcala
Share:

Editor's Picks

GBP/USD flirts with tops near 1.3470

GBP/USD manages to regain composure and challenge the area of daily highs around 1.3470 on Friday. Cable picks up pace despite marginal gains in the Greenback in a context of swelling geopolitical tensions and rising global oil prices.

EUR/USD trims losses, back above 1.1500

EUR/USD picks up some pace and bouces off earlier lows, reclaiming the 1.1500 threshold and beyond at the end of the week. The pair’s modest pullback follows a persistent risk-averse market mood and renewed buying interest for the US Dollar.

Gold: The $4,000 mark holds the downside for now

Gold faces renewed selling pressure, falling sharply toweard the $4,000 mark per troy ounce as the US Dollar regains momentum. Escalating US-Iran tensions are keeping inflation concerns and expectations of further Fed rate hikes alive, weighing further on the yellow metal.

Bitcoin eyes 50-day EMA breakout, Ethereum consolidates, XRP steadies

Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Ripple trade near key technical levels on Friday as the broader cryptocurrency market pauses following last week's recovery. BTC is approaching the 50-day Exponential Moving Average while ETH continues to consolidate between two major EMAs.

Warsh needs to restore his reputation
We were glad to see our deeply negative reaction to the Warsh press conference was not some personal peculiarity. Just about everybody in the financial press felt the same way. The consensus is building it’s not the Fed in the dog-house but only Warsh. Today the WSJ changed it tune and blasted Warsh—"the honeymoon is already over..”
9-3: Is the Federal Reserve’s vote tally Warsh's new forward guidance?
The rate did not move. Neither did the statement, and that’s the more interesting fact. Set the July 29 Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) statement beside the one issued on June 17, and the two documents are identical apart from a single verb and a paragraph at the bottom naming three dissenters.