|

NZD/USD: RBNZ hawkish tone supports pair – Rabobank

Rabobank Senior FX Strategist Jane Foley highlights that stronger-than-expected New Zealand Consumer Price Index (CPI) and a hawkish Reserve Bank of New Zealand (RBNZ) stance have driven aggressive market pricing for policy tightening and supported the New Zealand Dollar (NZD). Foley notes near-term downside risks for NZD/USD from safe-haven Dollar demand and softer RBNZ expectations, but still anticipates a moderate NZD/USD recovery later this year as further Federal Reserve (Fed) rate cuts loom.

Hawkish RBNZ versus Fed cut risks

"For now, however, the stickiness of domestically driven inflation clearly has the market worried. New Zealand headline Q1 CPI inflation registered a stronger than expected 3.1% y/y, in line with the previous release."

"On the back of this week’s release of stronger than expected Q1 New Zealand CPI inflation data and the hawkish tone of the RBNZ, the market is priced for over 100 bps of rate hikes on a 1-year view. This is far more aggressive than Rabobank’s forecasts."

"Although the RBNZ has not announced any policy change in recent months, there has been a noticeable tightening of monetary conditions stemming from the move higher in market rates and the stronger performance of the NZD. Since the market has already done this heavy lifting, it may eventually mean that the RBNZ can afford to raise rates a little less than some market hawks currently expect."

"An escalation in the Iran war would likely lead to another bout of safe haven USD buying and a dip in NZD/USD near-term, while a moderation in RBNZ rate hike expectations could weigh on the outlook for NZD/USD on a 1-to-3-month view. That said, we expect the currency pair to edge moderately higher later in the year on risk of further Fed rate cuts."

(This article was created with the help of an Artificial Intelligence tool and reviewed by an editor.)

Author

FXStreet Insights Team

The FXStreet Insights Team is a group of journalists that handpicks selected market observations published by renowned experts. The content includes notes by commercial as well as additional insights by internal and external analysts.

More from FXStreet Insights Team
Share:

Editor's Picks

GBP/USD flirts with tops near 1.3470

GBP/USD manages to regain composure and challenge the area of daily highs around 1.3470 on Friday. Cable picks up pace despite marginal gains in the Greenback in a context of swelling geopolitical tensions and rising global oil prices.

EUR/USD trims losses, back above 1.1500

EUR/USD picks up some pace and bouces off earlier lows, reclaiming the 1.1500 threshold and beyond at the end of the week. The pair’s modest pullback follows a persistent risk-averse market mood and renewed buying interest for the US Dollar.

Gold: The $4,000 mark holds the downside for now

Gold faces renewed selling pressure, falling sharply toweard the $4,000 mark per troy ounce as the US Dollar regains momentum. Escalating US-Iran tensions are keeping inflation concerns and expectations of further Fed rate hikes alive, weighing further on the yellow metal.

Bitcoin eyes 50-day EMA breakout, Ethereum consolidates, XRP steadies

Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Ripple trade near key technical levels on Friday as the broader cryptocurrency market pauses following last week's recovery. BTC is approaching the 50-day Exponential Moving Average while ETH continues to consolidate between two major EMAs.

Warsh needs to restore his reputation
We were glad to see our deeply negative reaction to the Warsh press conference was not some personal peculiarity. Just about everybody in the financial press felt the same way. The consensus is building it’s not the Fed in the dog-house but only Warsh. Today the WSJ changed it tune and blasted Warsh—"the honeymoon is already over..”
9-3: Is the Federal Reserve’s vote tally Warsh's new forward guidance?
The rate did not move. Neither did the statement, and that’s the more interesting fact. Set the July 29 Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) statement beside the one issued on June 17, and the two documents are identical apart from a single verb and a paragraph at the bottom naming three dissenters.