|

Malaysia: AI boom offsets energy shock risks – HSBC

HSBC strategists describe Malaysia as relatively resilient to elevated Oil prices thanks to its status as a net energy exporter and beneficiary of the AI (Artificial intelligence) hardware cycle. Strong Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and export performance contrast with rising fiscal costs from petrol subsidies. They keep growth forecasts intact, lift inflation projections, and expect Bank Negara Malaysia (BNM) to keep rates unchanged through 2027.

Resilient growth but fiscal strains build

"Until the Middle East conflict, the Malaysian economy was in a “Goldilocks” stage, with strong growth and stable inflation. But the conflict increases the possibility of downside risks to growth and upside risks to inflation, even if Malaysia has demonstrated more resilience than regional peers, as it is not only a net energy exporter, but also a key beneficiary of the sustained AI cycle."

"Malaysia has made a strong start to the year, with GDP up 5.4% y-o-y in 1Q26. While construction cooled from double-digit to single-digit growth, the sustained strength in manufacturing and services has more than offset the moderation."

"Exports remain strong, thanks to the ongoing AI-driven tech cycle. On a 3-month moving average basis, Malaysia’s electronics exports surged to 30% y-o-y."

"This comes with significant fiscal costs. The monthly subsidy bill for energy has risen tenfold from MYR700m to MYR7bn due to the conflict. The hefty subsidies raise questions on what comes next for the RON95 policy, as it imposes huge pressures on Malaysia’s fiscal coffers."

"Overall, we maintain our GDP growth forecasts at 4.5% for 2026 and 4.7% for 2027. Bank Negara Malaysia (BNM) is one of the few Asian central banks to raise its 2026 growth forecast range, increasing it from 4-4.5% to 4-5%."

(This article was created with the help of an Artificial Intelligence tool and reviewed by an editor.)

Author

FXStreet Insights Team

The FXStreet Insights Team is a group of journalists that handpicks selected market observations published by renowned experts. The content includes notes by commercial as well as additional insights by internal and external analysts.

More from FXStreet Insights Team
Share:

Editor's Picks

GBP/USD trims gains, back to around 1.3500

GBP/USD now surrenders part of the earlier move to multi-week peaks around 1.3530 and comes close to the 1.3500 support on Monday. Cable’s uptick comes in tandem with decent gains in the Greenback, always amid persistent uncertainty lingering over the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz and US-Iran talks.

EUR/USD deflates to 1.1540

EUR/USD begins the week on the back foot, retesting the 1.1540 zone as the NA session draws to a close. The better tone in the US Dollar weighs on the risk complex, sparking the daily correction in spot, always on the back of unabated effervescence in the Middle East.

Gold clings to daily gains; focus is back to $4,400

Gold picks up pace and advances past the $4,350 mark per troy ounce, adding to Friday’s gains. That said, the yellow metal keeps pushing harder despite the better tone in the US Dollar, and is closely following the Fed’s interest-rate outlook as well as developments in the Middle East

Bitcoin vs Gold Overview: XAU tests breakout, BTC slides as Trump claims Iran negotiations
The cryptocurrency market shows signs of trimming gains accrued last week as Bitcoin (BTC) slides below $65,000 at the time of writing on Monday. Meanwhile, Gold (XAU/USD) maintains a bullish outlook, hovering above $4,350.
US Payrolls miss – RBA on deck tomorrow
It would be remiss of me not to kick off this morning’s report with a rundown of last Friday’s US jobs report, which was a belter. Headline payrolls fell by 23,000, versus expectations of an 80,000 gain. The BLS noted that May was revised down by 66,000 (from 129,000) and June by 37,000 (from 57,000), resulting in combined May-June revisions of 103,000 lower than previous reports.
9-3: Is the Federal Reserve’s vote tally Warsh's new forward guidance?
The rate did not move. Neither did the statement, and that’s the more interesting fact. Set the July 29 Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) statement beside the one issued on June 17, and the two documents are identical apart from a single verb and a paragraph at the bottom naming three dissenters.