|

India : Narrow demand response weighs on GST – Societe Generale

Kunal Kundu of Societe Generale argues that India’s Goods and Services Tax (GST) data and Index of Industrial Production (IIP) figures point to a soft consumption backbone. Post-September 2025 GST rate cuts have not produced a broad-based demand uplift, with gains concentrated in motor vehicles and select categories. IIP shows consumer durables outperforming flat non-durables, suggesting everyday consumption remains subdued.

IIP signals uneven household demand trends

"Apart from motor vehicle demand, the economy-wide demand impulse has not yet been strong enough to lift net domestic GST materially once refunds are stripped out. This is consistent with the idea that demand response has been narrow, concentrated in a few rate-cut beneficiaries, rather than broad-based across the consumption basket that typically drives domestic GST buoyancy."

"That’s where usefulness of the IIP data lies, not because IIP is perfect, but because it offers an independent check on whether household demand is strengthening broadly or only in select channels."

"The use-based IIP classification continues to show an uneven consumer picture, with consumer durables (demand that is more skewed toward middle and upper income households) holding up better than consumer non-durables."

"During FY26, while consumer goods production rose 2.45% yoy, it was primarily led by consumer durable goods production, while production of consumer non-durable goods remained flat. indicating unchanged production in the category that typically tracks everyday consumption."

"The point is not that non-durables are collapsing, but that the broad consumption backbone still looks soft. To us, this is hardly the environment in which a demand-led GST upswing usually takes root."

(This article was created with the help of an Artificial Intelligence tool and reviewed by an editor.)

Author

FXStreet Insights Team

The FXStreet Insights Team is a group of journalists that handpicks selected market observations published by renowned experts. The content includes notes by commercial as well as additional insights by internal and external analysts.

More from FXStreet Insights Team
Share:

Editor's Picks

GBP/USD clings to 1.3500 amid marginal losses

GBP/USD alternates gains with losses around the 1.3500 neighbourhood on Tuesday. Indeed, Cable struggles to further extend its incipient recovery in a context of continuous instability in the Middle East and modest gains in the Greenback.

EUR/USD alternates gains with losses near 1.1540

EUR/USD navigates a tight range near 1.1550 in the latter part of Tuesday’s NA session. The US Dollar’s vacillating price action accompanies the pair while market participants gear up for the crucial US inflation data due on Wednesday.

Gold awaits US CPI inflation for the next big move

Gold is back on the bids and looks to regain the $4,400 level in Wednesday’s Asian trading, having found buyers near the $4,350 region. All eyes remain on the high-impact US Consumer Price Index data, which could determine if Gold stretches higher or corrects sharply.

Bitcoin steadies, Ethereum holds 50-day EMA, XRP rebounds from $1 support

Bitcoin, Ethereum and Ripple are showing mixed price action on Wednesday as traders assess key technical support levels. BTC remains under pressure after its recent decline, while ETH is attempting to extend its rebound from the 50-day Exponential Moving Average. Meanwhile, XRP is holding above the crucial $1 level, keeping its recovery attempt intact.

US Dollar: CPI keeps USD in tight ranges

OCBC’s Sim Moh Siong and Christopher Wong note the US Dollar softened as Fed hike expectations moderated and the US yield curve steepened. They argue that without a strong upside surprise in United States Consumer Price Index, the USD should stay rangebound, supporting carry trades.

9-3: Is the Federal Reserve’s vote tally Warsh's new forward guidance?
The rate did not move. Neither did the statement, and that’s the more interesting fact. Set the July 29 Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) statement beside the one issued on June 17, and the two documents are identical apart from a single verb and a paragraph at the bottom naming three dissenters.