|

BoC: Growth, energy and cut risks – TD Securities

TD Securities analysts see the Bank of Canada balancing trade uncertainty, higher Oil prices and domestic demand. They say GDP must run above potential to avoid disinflationary risks and rate cuts, and that Q1 data will be pivotal. Energy-driven growth and inflation could help keep policy on hold, but consumer and fiscal trends remain more important.

Growth and Oil shape BoC outlook

"For the BoC to remain on hold this year, GDP growth needs to be above potential. Growth that is merely at potential implies persistent negative supply, creating disinflationary risks down the line – which would call for cuts."

"In that sense, Q1 data is hugely important. We don't necessarily need to see growth in line with the BoC's forecast of 1.8% in the January MPR, but anything materially below 1.0% would raise questions about the current policy setting. We have plenty of time for Governor Macklem's argument that monetary policy shouldn't necessarily respond to structural weakness in the economy, but it is still appropriate for the Bank to respond to cyclical shocks in this environment."

"The January 2026 MPR assumed $55/bbl WTI, so if oil prices hold near current levels ($75/$80 for WTI/Brent) it would conceivably add 0.4-0.5 p.p. to the BoC's baseline growth trajectory. It would also lift the Bank's inflation profile by a similar magnitude, leaving headline CPI sitting near 2.5% by Q4."

"This sort of incremental boost to growth would be enough to comfortably keep the Bank on the sidelines in a tight decision, but we'd emphasize that the energy price story is still probably less important than the outlook for government spending or the health of the consumer. We would also expect the Bank of Canada to look through any headline inflation shock if higher energy prices do not spill over into core measures."

(This article was created with the help of an Artificial Intelligence tool and reviewed by an editor.)

Author

FXStreet Insights Team

The FXStreet Insights Team is a group of journalists that handpicks selected market observations published by renowned experts. The content includes notes by commercial as well as additional insights by internal and external analysts.

More from FXStreet Insights Team
Share:

Editor's Picks

GBP/USD trims gains; back to 1.3450-ish

The persistent weakness hurting the Greenback lends support to the British Pound and the rest of the risk-linked assets, sending GBP/USD to new two-day tops past 1.3480 on Wednesday. Indeed, Cable advances for the second day in a row helped by the constant optimism around a potential US-Iran deal.

EUR/USD hovers around two-month peaks near 1.1560

EUR/USD advances for the second day in a row, challenging multi-week highs in the 1.1560 zone on Wednesday. The persistent weakness hitting the US Dollar underpins the move higher in spot while market participants continue to closely follow developments from the Middle East and gear up for upcoming key data releases in the US jobs market. On Thursday, all the attention will be on the release of weekly Claims alongside Challenger Job Cuts.

How Wall Street rigs the game [Video]

In this week’s Live from the Vault, Andrew Maguire is joined by Peter Antico and Sean Stone to discuss the Paradigm of Money - an in-depth expose of financial market corruption, from naked shorting to the two-tier system that protects Wall Street.

Bitcoin stalls despite strong market activity across traditional assets
Bitcoin (BTC) remained subdued while stocks edged higher and gold lower, suggesting the market is trapped between weakening institutional demand and growing signs of seller exhaustion, according to a Glassnode report on Wednesday.
Why the WTI sell-off may be hiding a supply warning
Prices for the barrel of the American Oil benchmark have fallen sharply as hopes of a US-Iran agreement have resurfaced, but a deeply backwardated Oil curve, tight Cushing stocks and light speculative positioning all warn that the sell-off may have gone too far.
9-3: Is the Federal Reserve’s vote tally Warsh's new forward guidance?
The rate did not move. Neither did the statement, and that’s the more interesting fact. Set the July 29 Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) statement beside the one issued on June 17, and the two documents are identical apart from a single verb and a paragraph at the bottom naming three dissenters.