|

Oil, who is really selling? [Video]

The move lower since May certainly isn't being driven by traders like you and me alone.

Let me give you my theory.

Ask the average American what matters most to them financially on a day-to-day basis.

Bread?

Probably not.

Wine?

Definitely not.

The price of petrol at the pump?

Absolutely.

For most Americans, fuel prices are one of the most visible measures of the economy.

Following the recent geopolitical tensions, Oil prices initially surged.

Politically, that's never a comfortable place to be.

With the US midterm elections on the horizon, keeping fuel prices under control is likely to be an important objective for any administration.

Whether that has influenced broader market sentiment or policy decisions is something every trader can make their own mind up about.

One thing I learnt during my years on institutional dealing room floors is that markets are influenced by far more than just retail traders.

Large institutions, major funds, producers, consumers and governments can all have an impact on price.

We, as traders, don't need to know every reason.

We simply need to read the price action.

And that's where trading psychology comes in.

Oil held both the 200-day Moving Average and the 200-week Moving Average for a considerable time.

Last week both finally gave way.

For me, that changed the technical picture completely.

I use stop-and-reverse orders.

They work for me.

I don't have an ego.

Markets don't know I'm here.

They can go up.

They can go down.

I simply trade what I see.

Could Oil trade back towards its pre-March levels before the midterms?

I believe it's entirely possible.

Whether I'm right or wrong doesn't matter.

The market will decide.

My job is simply to listen.

This is not investment advice.

My Money. My Risk.

Youtube preview

Author

Carol Harmer

Carol Harmer

Charmer Trading

Carol Harmer has over 39 years experience of analysing and trading the world's markets and is undoubtedly one of the most respected technical trader in the world today.

More from Carol Harmer
Share:

Editor's Picks

GBP/USD treads water around 1.3400 as Hormuz risks lift USD

GBP/USD trades with caution around 1.3400 in European trading on Monday, away from an over three-week high, or levels just above the 1.3500 psychological mark touched on Friday. The pair faces headwinds from a modest US Dollar rebound as investors rush to safety amid renewed jitters on the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz and US-Iran talks.

EUR/USD consolidates near 1.1550 amid Mideast tensions

EUR/USD keeps its range near 1.1550 in the European session on Monday, holding the retreat from fresh highs since June 17, touched in reaction to the disappointing US jobs data on Friday. Renewed Middle East tensions lend support to the safe-haven US Dollar, capping the pair's upside attempts amid improved Eurozone sentiment data.

Gold holds gains near $4,350; remains below June 17 high

Gold reverses a modest intraday dip, and climbs to the top boundary of its daily range, closer to the $4,350 level in the European session. The commodity, however, remains below its highest level since June 17, touched on Friday, following the release of the US Nonfarm Payrolls report.

Pi Network: Mild bearish bias caps PI corrective rebound

Pi Network extends losses Monday after a bearish close the previous day, as price remains capped below the $0.1000 psychological threshold. Speculative demand for PI is low, with Open Interest holding above $9 million as broader market sentiment improves. The technical outlook for PI indicates a mild bearish bias as the $0.0961 resistance level remains intact.

US Payrolls miss – RBA on deck tomorrow
It would be remiss of me not to kick off this morning’s report with a rundown of last Friday’s US jobs report, which was a belter. Headline payrolls fell by 23,000, versus expectations of an 80,000 gain. The BLS noted that May was revised down by 66,000 (from 129,000) and June by 37,000 (from 57,000), resulting in combined May-June revisions of 103,000 lower than previous reports.
9-3: Is the Federal Reserve’s vote tally Warsh's new forward guidance?
The rate did not move. Neither did the statement, and that’s the more interesting fact. Set the July 29 Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) statement beside the one issued on June 17, and the two documents are identical apart from a single verb and a paragraph at the bottom naming three dissenters.